ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Babb on Twitter: Pioli controls game day lineups (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=264986)

BigMeatballDave 10-11-2012 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 9001971)
and Dave still believes whatever makes him happy ... proof be dammed.

The fact that the Chiefs have kept Cassel starting is enough proof for me.

boogblaster 10-11-2012 12:41 PM

get a rope .....

Lzen 10-11-2012 12:45 PM

Wow. :doh!:If true Pioli needs to be shown the door....YESTERDAY!

CoMoChief 10-11-2012 12:46 PM

I just really have a hard time believing this at all.

I doubt that even RAC would accept Pioli dictating who starts on gameday.

Lzen 10-11-2012 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9001836)
Steve Breaston is a better NFL player than Dexter McCluster or Jon Baldwin are or will ever be...but he's been effectively rendered useless because he was basically a Haley guy.

Scott Pioli sucks donkey cocks.

I will give you McCluster, but Baldwin has a pretty high ceiling, IMO.

FAX 10-11-2012 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 9002016)
I just really have a hard time believing this at all.

I doubt that even RAC would accept Pioli dictating who starts on gameday.

The sad truth is that Babb has no reason to say this if it weren't true. None. He's moved on.

Besides, it's probably not the entire game-day roster he's talking about ... just a few guys that Pioli wants to see on the field.

FAX

Hammock Parties 10-11-2012 12:50 PM

He's a deep threat who hasn't caught a single deep ball this year. LMAO

Better than average chance he's a bust.

Dave Lane 10-11-2012 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 9001968)
That's just proves stupidity, not the rest of this fairy tale.

again ... give me any semblance of truth and i'm on board.



but Haley is not even close be being credible

And Pioli is? And he doesn't even deny it.

You are Black Bob admit it!

Chiefnj2 10-11-2012 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 9002031)
The sad truth is that Babb has no reason to say this if it weren't true. None. He's moved on.

Besides, it's probably not the entire game-day roster he's talking about ... just a few guys that Pioli wants to see on the field.

FAX

He should have said it 3 years ago.

BigMeatballDave 10-11-2012 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 9002016)
I just really have a hard time believing this at all.

I doubt that even RAC would accept Pioli dictating who starts on gameday.

This was Crennel's only shot to be HC.

He's going to go along with it.

BigMeatballDave 10-11-2012 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9002033)
He's a deep threat who hasn't caught a single deep ball this year. LMAO

Better than average chance he's a bust.

Cannot possibly evaluate a WR with Cassel as QB.

Dave Lane 10-11-2012 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 9002036)
He should have said it 3 years ago.

Is there a point to this post?

Dave Lane 10-11-2012 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9002046)
Cannot possibly evaluate a WR with Cassel as QB.

Especially a deep threat

Rasputin 10-11-2012 12:54 PM

The beard did not care.















Well maybe the beard did care I don't know?

FAX 10-11-2012 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 9002036)
He should have said it 3 years ago.

Maybe he didn't know then. Or maybe he was giving Pioli the benefit of the doubt. Or maybe it was a non-issue at the time.

Whatever the reason he didn't mention this 3 years ago doesn't change the salient facts or whether it is true or not.

I'll say this much, Pioli behaves a whole lot more like Darth Liberace The Elder than I thought anyone ever could. It is a believable scenario.

FAX

BigMeatballDave 10-11-2012 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 9002036)
He should have said it 3 years ago.

Um, duh?

Lzen 10-11-2012 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9001964)
Laz still loves him some Scott Pioli.

I have grown tired of Pioli, but at the same time don't care for all the heresy. While I agree that this sounds believable and it would help explain the Haley situation, the fact is that there is no proof given in this tweet.

Brock 10-11-2012 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lzen (Post 9002070)
I have grown tired of Pioli, but at the same time don't care for all the heresy. While I agree that this sounds believable and it would help explain the Haley situation, the fact is that there is no proof given in this tweet.

Whitlock didn't have any proof of what he was saying either, but it seems pretty evidently true.

Lzen 10-11-2012 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9001986)
The fact that the Chiefs have kept Cassel starting is enough proof for me.

That's enough proof for me to believe that Pioli has forced the Chiefs coaches to continue to start Cassel. It's not exactly proof that he controls the entire roster lineup.

Lzen 10-11-2012 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9002033)
He's a deep threat who hasn't caught a single deep ball this year. LMAO

Better than average chance he's a bust.

He has obviously has been slow to learn the finer details (like running precise routes)of being a great WR in the NFL. That does not mean he will not become a good NFL WR. C'mon, man. Your whole schtick is getting old. I agree with you on Cassel. But McCluster and Baldwin haven't been given much of a chance by you.

DeezNutz 10-11-2012 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lzen (Post 9002078)
That's enough proof for me to believe that Pioli has forced the Chiefs coaches to continue to start Cassel. It's not exactly proof that he controls the entire roster lineup.

If he controls one thing, he controls it all.

HemiEd 10-11-2012 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9001818)
Was there ever any question of this? Come on.

I thought it was obvious from day one, mainly with Cassel.

I have said it several times, but RAC had a sudden orchestrated change of heart about Cassel once he got the job.

Chiefnj2 10-11-2012 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 9002047)
Is there a point to this post?

Babb has no idea if Pioli controls any aspect of the lineup with RC. What's the point of raising the story that Pioli controlled the game day roster with Haley years ago? Wouldn't it have been much more relevant to talk about when Haley was the head coach?

FringeNC 10-11-2012 01:04 PM

Orton was so obviously a better QB. We could have cut Cassel and signed Orton as an interim QB. Pioli completely just threw the season away by bringing Cassel back, but I guess he convinced CHunt that Cassel was a stud, and Haley was the whole problem. I wonder what CHunt thinks now.

DeezNutz 10-11-2012 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 9002087)
Babb has no idea if Pioli controls any aspect of the lineup with RC. What's the point of raising the story that Pioli controlled the game day roster with Haley years ago? Wouldn't it have been much more relevant to talk about when Haley was the head coach?

Provides an insight into questions about why RAC has seemingly refused to pull Cassel, despite having to run a 1930s-style offense.

FringeNC 10-11-2012 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9002091)
Provides an insight into questions about why RAC has seemingly refused to pull Cassel, despite having to run a 1930s-style offense.

Could have been giving Pioli a big "**** you", too.

I thinking Crennel is pissed, but he won't rock the ship like Haley.

Lzen 10-11-2012 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9002091)
Provides an insight into questions about why RAC has seemingly refused to pull Cassel, despite having to run a 1930s-style offense.

I agree that all of this sure adds up to this BS. :banghead:

Mother****erJones 10-11-2012 01:09 PM

If this is all true than I will reevaluate the Haley situation but Haley should have come forward with all this

Munson 10-11-2012 01:09 PM

If this is true, he should be fired immediately. I don't think I've ever heard of a GM that was so insecure and intrusive, that he demands control over the gameday lineup. That mother****er is so desperate to show that he's a football genius. Its ****ing pathetic. :cuss:

mcaj22 10-11-2012 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dtchiefs4life (Post 9002104)
If this is all true than I will reevaluate the Haley situation but Haley should have come forward with all this

come forward with information about his old job he doesnt care about anymore and RISK LOSING MILLIONS?

why do you think he kept quiet.

acasas4 10-11-2012 01:15 PM

1 Attachment(s)
For you Scott.

DaneMcCloud 10-11-2012 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dtchiefs4life (Post 9002104)
If this is all true than I will reevaluate the Haley situation but Haley should have come forward with all this

It's a certainty that Haley signed a confidentiality agreement. If he released this information immediately, he would have been in breach of contract and not entitled to the remainder of money on his contract.

He has a wife and five daughters. Do you really think that he'd break his silence?

FAX 10-11-2012 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 9002087)
Babb has no idea if Pioli controls any aspect of the lineup with RC. What's the point of raising the story that Pioli controlled the game day roster with Haley years ago? Wouldn't it have been much more relevant to talk about when Haley was the head coach?

It seems pretty obvious ...

In last Sunday's game, we had no actual, normal quarterback position on the field. We had a handoff and occasional turnover specialist. It sponsored attention because that particular game-plan was the most shocking thing to take place on a football field since 1972 when Don McLean mooned the crowd during the halftime show.

So, here's how it probably went down ...

Babb sees the game and realizes (like everyone else in the world with TV reception) there's no point for Cassel to even be on the field since they're not going to throw a single pass all day. Then he remembers that Pioli used to demand that Haley play Cassel as well as other selected Pioli picks as starters. Then he thinks to himself, "Hmmm, I wonder if Pioli is forcing Roleo to start and play Cassel?" Then he says to himself, "I think I'll post a tweeter to that effect".

Something like that.

FAX

Discuss Thrower 10-11-2012 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 9002099)
Could have been giving Pioli a big "**** you", too.

I thinking Crennel is pissed, but he won't rock the ship like Haley.

What exactly did Haley do to rock the boat?

Seeing the Tunechi perform with Flowers? The beard? Palko? The Meadowlands Meltdown?

FAX 10-11-2012 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9002130)
It's a certainty that Haley signed a confidentiality agreement. If he released this information immediately, he would have been in breach of contract and not entitled to the remainder of money on his contract.

He has a wife and five daughters. Do you really think that he'd break his silence?

Yep. I've recently made discreet inquiries with several Chiefs ex-employees and it's pretty clear that they all signed confidentiality docs. It's funny to watch them try to answer then ... reconsider.

There's no chance that anyone goes to work for the Chiefs without signing a confidentiality agreement. None.

FAX

WV 10-11-2012 01:21 PM

Don't get me wrong, I like what he's saying but isn't this the same Kent Babb that most claim is an ignorant mouth breather?

DaneMcCloud 10-11-2012 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WV (Post 9002152)
Don't get me wrong, I like what he's saying but isn't this the same Kent Babb that most claim is an ignorant mouth breather?

That would be Adam Teicher

DeezNutz 10-11-2012 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WV (Post 9002152)
Don't get me wrong, I like what he's saying but isn't this the same Kent Babb that most claim is an ignorant mouth breather?

Washington Post suggests that Babb can use his nose.

WV 10-11-2012 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9002156)
That would be Adam Teicher

I can't keep track, first we all love Whitlock and now Babb....LOL!

TEX 10-11-2012 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9001802)
@kentbabb

Romeo Crennel has found a humane way to bench Matt Cassel without offending Big Brother. KC has probably seen the end of the Cassel era.

Haley battled w/Pioli about Pioli's demand to control gameday lineup. GM wanted to be head coach too. Wonder if Romeo in same boat.


A HC can't succeed if he lacks unquestioned control over game-day moves. Crennel's concussion is unfortunate, but this is RAC's Bastille Day.

Oops a daisy. Meant Cassel's concussion, of course, though Crennel's coaching definitely has led to dizziness and nausea.

------------------------------

Just more proof that Pioli needs to be shown the door.

Wonder why Peyton Manning wanted nothing to do with KC...:hmmm:

Ace Gunner 10-11-2012 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 9001959)
could be true ... if you believe an insane ex-employee with an ax to grind that has already lied about illegal wire-tapping.

I thought there was something wrong with you after reading some of your posts, but this one is just psycho. You really are a nut.

teedubya 10-11-2012 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 9001950)
why ... because i ask for ANY semblance of proof for wild claims?

There is no PROOF, because Arrowhead is locked down like a military compound. :banghead: The only proof I need is in the consistent shitty results on teh field and a dumbass quarterback, who everyone knows sucks ass... except the team.

Predarat 10-11-2012 01:33 PM

Whoever it is could not control a jucu JV game.

Chiefs Pantalones 10-11-2012 01:46 PM

That's why the Browns didn't hire him. He wanted "control only God would demand" according to reports.

Fritz88 10-11-2012 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 9002016)
I just really have a hard time believing this at all.

I doubt that even RAC would accept Pioli dictating who starts on gameday.

U funny
Posted via Mobile Device

Chiefs Pantalones 10-11-2012 01:48 PM

Kendrick Lewis will start

FAX 10-11-2012 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones (Post 9002232)
Kendrick Lewis will start

What does it mean?

FAX

Chiefs Pantalones 10-11-2012 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 9002234)
What does it mean?

FAX

Double rainbow

Easy 6 10-11-2012 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 9002164)
Wonder why Peyton Manning wanted nothing to do with KC...:hmmm:

Oh yeah, you can BET he had piolis number, i'm sure he'd have rather gouged out his eye with a melon baller than work for him.

CoMoChief 10-11-2012 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9002037)
This was Crennel's only shot to be HC.

He's going to go along with it.

RAC is what 67 yrs old or some shit?

He's been a DC his whole NFL career and has won multiple SB's. He really has nothing to coach for.

Pioli is probably a close friend of his....I just REALLY doubt he'd take this job knowing that he'd have to answer to Pioli when it comes to gameday starters.

I could be wrong...but it would take a REAL asshole of a GM to force that on a HC...esp one who's a friend.

Who knows....maybe Pioli will only hire "yes" men.

Brock 10-11-2012 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 9002247)
I could be wrong...but it would take a REAL asshole of a GM to force that on a HC...esp one who's a friend.

Who knows....maybe Pioli will only hire "yes" men.

You've got this backwards. It takes a real pal to give a guy millions of dollars to be a head coach when he has no other chance of ever being a head coach again. Well, not really, if the guy doing the hiring has no other real choices.

Titty Meat 10-11-2012 01:59 PM

It worked in money ball

DaneMcCloud 10-11-2012 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9002261)
It worked in money ball

That movie greatly exaggerated facts, if not outright changed history, in order to make the film far more dramatic.

RUSH 10-11-2012 02:20 PM

I doubt it stops at the players.

Does anyone really believe that Todd Haley wanted to bring in Charlie Weis to run his offense? I highly doubt it considering each of their personalities and ego.

Steron 10-11-2012 02:23 PM

Please Clark. Sell the ****ing team.

Lex Luthor 10-11-2012 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9002261)
It worked in money ball

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9002263)
That movie greatly exaggerated facts, if not outright changed history, in order to make the film far more dramatic.

You mean because practically NOWHERE in the movie do they ever mention Mark Mulder, Barry Zito or Tim Hudson?

Moneyball would have you believe that Scott Hatteberg and his impressive on-base percentage is what led the A's to all those division titles. I'm thinking that having three stud pitchers in the rotation didn't hurt.

The book was far better than the movie.

Titty Meat 10-11-2012 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9002263)
That movie greatly exaggerated facts, if not outright changed history, in order to make the film far more dramatic.

I was joking but Scottie already completed his money ball. He took a POS QB with a broke dick OLB and won the division.

htismaqe 10-11-2012 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 9002260)
You've got this backwards. It takes a real pal to give a guy millions of dollars to be a head coach when he has no other chance of ever being a head coach again. Well, not really, if the guy doing the hiring has no other real choices.

This.

siberian khatru 10-11-2012 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brainiac (Post 9002364)
You mean because practically NOWHERE in the movie do they ever mention Mark Mulder, Barry Zito or Tim Hudson?

Moneyball would have you believe that Scott Hatteberg and his impressive on-base percentage is what led the A's to all those division titles. I'm thinking that having three stud pitchers in the rotation didn't hurt.

The book was far better than the movie.

Plus, Howe was right -- Pena was better than Hatteberg.

Pasta Little Brioni 10-11-2012 03:14 PM

"OMG LOOK WHAT'S HAPPENING IN OAKLAND!!!!" They didn't win shit. Soooo ****ing lame of a movie.

DaneMcCloud 10-11-2012 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9002501)
"OMG LOOK WHAT'S HAPPENING IN OAKLAND!!!!" They didn't win shit. Soooo ****ing lame of a movie.

Not only that but Billy Beane was an absolutely idiot for not taking $12 million to become the GM of the Red Sox.

Dummy.

L.A. Chieffan 10-11-2012 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9002528)
Not only that but Billy Beane was an absolutely idiot for not taking $12 million to become the GM of the Red Sox.

Dummy.

I dont remember if it was the book (good book btw) or the movie but he says at one point that he made a decision based solely on money once in his life and he was never going to make that mistake again.

Still a dummy tho.

007 10-11-2012 04:03 PM

So Pioli is a poor mans Jerry Jones too eh?

ShowtimeSBMVP 10-11-2012 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9002528)
Not only that but Billy Beane was an absolutely idiot for not taking $12 million to become the GM of the Red Sox.

Dummy.

Why? In Boston if you don't win your gone. In Oakland he'll never get fired and make up the money he lost by not going to Boston.

DaneMcCloud 10-11-2012 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 9002635)
Why? In Boston if you don't win your gone. In Oakland he'll never get fired and make up the money he lost by not going to Boston.

He would have won in Boston.

And if he hadn't, he'd have a shit ton of money AND the fact that no one had one in Boston for 100 years behind him.

Plus, who doesn't want to play on the biggest stage?

And FWIW, have you ever BEEN to Oakland and/or the Oakland Coliseum?

DeezNutz 10-11-2012 04:19 PM

He's now a part owner in OAK, so I'd say that his decision wasn't so bad, especially thinking long-term.

DaneMcCloud 10-11-2012 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9002680)
He's now a part owner in OAK, so I'd say that his decision wasn't so bad, especially thinking long-term.

What's his percentage of ownership? I can't find it. I'd be shocked if it were more than 10%.

DeezNutz 10-11-2012 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9002730)
What's his percentage of ownership? I can't find it. I'd be shocked if it were more than 10%.

Yeah, don't know. All I can find is "minority owner" bullshit, too. But let's say it's 10 percent. Bare minimum, OAK is making $20M per year. Not a bad little yearly return.

Titty Meat 10-11-2012 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9002680)
He's now a part owner in OAK, so I'd say that his decision wasn't so bad, especially thinking long-term.

Ah yes Oakland. The one team whos owner is worse than Glass or Hunt.

Rasputin 10-11-2012 04:42 PM

Pioli just doesn't want someone else to out shine his boy Cassell that's the bottom line. @63mill QB he hand picked its live or die with him.

BossChief 10-11-2012 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kaplin42 (Post 9001838)
If this is true, then I think we as a whole need to rethink our evaluations on coaches like Haley and RAC. If Pioli is so hamstringing his team this way, they he truly is the problem and should be let go this second.

What a fail of a GM. I'm really having a hard time understanding how someone can be in the position they are in, and be that F'ing stupid.

Haley would have had us in a championship game or superbowl by now if we had a qb.

Ace Gunner 10-11-2012 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9002757)
Haley would have had us in a championship game or superbowl by now if we had a qb.

and you know he would have had one here in KC seasons ago had Pioli allowed it.

The irony in this is that so many anti haley fans are the same ones calling for a 1st rate QB.

Otter 10-11-2012 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 9002149)
Yep. I've recently made discreet inquiries with several Chiefs ex-employees and it's pretty clear that they all signed confidentiality docs. It's funny to watch them try to answer then ... reconsider.

There's no chance that anyone goes to work for the Chiefs without signing a confidentiality agreement. None.

FAX

LoLz, The Third Reich lives on! Heil!

farmerchief 10-11-2012 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lou_Zare (Post 9002781)
and you know he would have had one here in KC seasons ago had Pioli allowed it.

The irony in this is that so many anti haley fans are the same ones calling for a 1st rate QB.

I kind of liked Haley, as he held the players accountable for their actions! No doubt, he made some rookie coaching mistakes, but if given another head coaching position in the future, Im encouraged he would be successful!

Marcellus 10-11-2012 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9001846)
I think you're right.

It's quite possible that Todd Haley was "Crazy Like a Fox" last season.

I stated this last year multiple times. He was trying to get fired.

GloryDayz 10-11-2012 07:20 PM

An absentee owner is one plausible explanation of how such a thing could happen...

DaneMcCloud 10-11-2012 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9002757)
Haley would have had us in a championship game or superbowl by now if we had a qb.

No ****ing way

CoMoChief 10-11-2012 07:34 PM

Cassel and Haley were not a good match. - But really who is?

He went from a HOF QB in Warner to a shit eating ****tard in Cassel. Hell his father came out and said Cassel was nothing but average...and I bet he was just being nice...get that guy off record and I bet he'd bath mouth the hell out of Cassel's game.

I don't agree with the way Haley treated the short offseason due to the NFL lockout and playing starters in the 4 pre-season game in the 4th qtr was criminally stupid. There are some players that had come out and said the atmosphere is better without Haley, but was Haley the problem - or was it Pioli and their releationship or lack there of? Haley wasn't a good match but I think he could have been a good coach.

I did like how he had the ****in balls to go for it on 4th down a lot.

BossChief 10-11-2012 07:37 PM

120 million total contract amount for Tyson Jackson and Matt Cassel?

Really?

For two guys that will be cut after this season...

If I was Clark, I'd be pissed.

Saccopoo 10-11-2012 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 9001818)
Was there ever any question of this? Come on.

I mean, McCluster, for one...

There was probably a ****ing mandate from Fuhrer Pioli to turn McCluster into a viable slot WR this offseason.

Not after Poe started over Powe in this preseason there wasn't.

I had my thoughts about this very thing, but Poe over Powe was a clear indicator that Pioli was actively controlling/showcasing his top draft picks.

It makes you wonder if Baldwin was a Haley influenced pick versus Pioli's choice. I think Haley wanted to create another Fitz/Bolden scenario, while the "Patriot way" never really gave two shits about wideouts.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.