ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Don Banks from SI on Chiefs Coaching/GM (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=268090)

Sorter 12-27-2012 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 9244443)
changing ... deflecting ... spinning



besides McCluster because a productive slot receiver as soon as Haley got fired.


we add a decent QB and a speed receiver and he will be even more productive.

DMC was not worth a 2nd round pick(i hated it the moment it happened) but the reality is that todd Haley SUCKED as a head coach.

Pioli's mistakes doesn't absolve Haley from his ... it just adds another mistake to Pioli's list.

OCD about Pioli is just beyond stupid

Wut?

DeezNutz 12-27-2012 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaWolf (Post 9244570)
To us, it is a no brainer. To Hunt, who knows.

So many times we're heard/read/said that Hunt "is a businessman, first and foremost."

At this point, we should all hope this is true because it makes zero business sense to retain Suckass Scott. The money Hunt would make by firing him is far greater than what he'd make if Pioli returns.

Ironically, Pioli and Cassel are figuratively tied to each other at the end, too; both are cheaper to cut than to keep.

jspchief 12-27-2012 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaWolf (Post 9244570)
To us, it is a no brainer. To Hunt, who knows. Pioli may sell him that they have a ton of talent on the team, and all they really need to do is to get the QB and get a new coaching staff in here with a fresh outlook on things. Also he may try to sell Hunt that they have done a poor job in free agency because the Pro Personnel guy hasn't been doing a great job of identifying talent and they need a new person in that position.

So at the end of the day, if Pioli is able to convince Hunt that the real changes that need to be made are on the personnel staff and on the coaching staff, and that the top offseason priority would be to find that franchise QB and also spend that cap money on key free agents, he might be able to convince Hunt to keep him around.

I highly doubt it happens, and fully expect a cleaning of the house, but at this point, who knows...

Sure, but who's fault is it we need a different HC (third in 5 years)? Who built the scouting department?

Pioli can point fingers at others to blame, but those guys are in place because of Pioli. It might be different if Hunt had to weigh Pioli's successes versus his failures, but there really aren't enough successes to even make a debate of it.

chiefzilla1501 12-27-2012 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 9244504)
You're going to look pretty stupid when he gets hired next year.

Why am I going to look stupid? He's going to get hired. Just because he gets hired, doesn't mean he's qualified. I think he'll be the next Ron Rivera. Just another team chasing after a shiny object.

DeezNutz 12-27-2012 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9244591)
Why am I going to look stupid? He's going to get hired. Just because he gets hired, doesn't mean he's qualified. I think he'll be the next Ron Rivera. Just another team chasing after a shiny object.

Kind of like Haley.

crossbow 12-27-2012 07:19 PM

Is there any way at all that we can get the scouts that Herm used, who got us guys like Jamaal Charles and Brandon Flowers in the third round?

DeezNutz 12-27-2012 07:20 PM

Flowers in the second.

SAUTO 12-27-2012 07:20 PM

Flowers was a 2
Posted via Mobile Device

BigMeatballDave 12-27-2012 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9244591)
Why am I going to look stupid? He's going to get hired. Just because he gets hired, doesn't mean he's qualified. I think he'll be the next Ron Rivera. Just another team chasing after a shiny object.

He's just as qualified to be HC as anyone else.

I wouldn't hate the hire.

He's 60. I'd like someone younger.

chiefzilla1501 12-27-2012 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9244572)
They also beat GB, Minny, and were more than competitive with Houston.

I am undecided on Arians as there are certainly a variety of factors to be considered.

Yes, they did, but as the season progressed they've basically been scraping by really bad teams. I've said that Arians has done well for the situation. But I don't see how what he did was much different from Singletary reviving his 49ers squad in year 1, from Mangini and Haley taking their teams from zero to hero early in their coaching tenure. An easy schedule makes a lot of coaches look good.

I've pointed out some of Arians' red flags. So when I discredit Arians' 2012 success, it's because I don't believe 2012 showed enough for me to make those red flags go away.

Sorter 12-27-2012 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9244607)
He's just as qualified to be HC as anyone else.

I wouldn't hate the hire.

He's 60. I'd like someone younger.

While I think there are some flaws with Bruce, it is important to realize that their A) is no perfect coach. ****, Belichick, regarded as one of the more detailed and innovative defensive coaches has ****ing had horrible Ds since 2008.

B) I think Bruce deserves a shot as a HC after this year. Personally, I'd just like to see him on another team. If Kelly is gone, and the other candidates are about equal with Arians, I'd support the hire of a guy with a track record of developing QBs, despite there being several things I detest.

Finally, I agree. I'd like to hire someone younger as well.

Sorter 12-27-2012 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9244610)
Yes, they did, but as the season progressed they've basically been scraping by really bad teams. I've said that Arians has done well for the situation. But I don't see how what he did was much different from Singletary reviving his 49ers squad in year 1, from Mangini and Haley taking their teams from zero to hero early in their coaching tenure. An easy schedule makes a lot of coaches look good.

I've pointed out some of Arians' red flags. So when I discredit Arians' 2012 success, it's because I don't believe 2012 showed enough for me to make those red flags go away.

Yup. I think he'd be an adequate stop-gap/consi prize. I'm not sure we reach a SB with Arians or he stays for a long time. However, having him could be exceptionally beneficial to Geno/Wilson.

Thig Lyfe 12-27-2012 07:31 PM

WE LOVE ARIANS

Rain Man 12-27-2012 07:35 PM

I'm not an expert about who to bring in, but I do know one thing. We darn well need to bring in some quarterback guru who is proven at developing quarterbacks.

chiefzilla1501 12-27-2012 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9244621)
Yup. I think he'd be an adequate stop-gap/consi prize. I'm not sure we reach a SB with Arians or he stays for a long time. However, having him could be exceptionally beneficial to Geno/Wilson.

I disagree. I think what you want is a terrific motivator/leader/disciplinary head coach and an offensive coordinator who is a QB guru. Again, the part that bothers me most about Arians is the way he enabled Big Ben to become a spoiled brat, on and off the field. Geno seems like a good kid, but he also seems a little immature. You need a head coach who's going to be tough but fair, not a coach like Arians who will be your best friend even when you screw up.

Mr. Laz 12-27-2012 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9244564)
I NEVER said it absolves Haley AT ALL.

Some people have to see things in black and white. I don't. I prefer to see the truth.

At the end of the day, Pioli hired Haley which means all of it is 100% Pioli's fault.

This started when Bosschief said firing Haley was a mistake ...

you semi agreed with him by saying this:
Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
Without Cassel, we might never have seen the outbursts we saw from Haley...

firing Haley wasn't Pioli's mistake, hiring him was

chiefzilla1501 12-27-2012 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9244607)
He's just as qualified to be HC as anyone else.

I wouldn't hate the hire.

He's 60. I'd like someone younger.

My concern with age is... the NFL is a close-knit community and when a guy coordinates for 10+ years, coordinates for one of the most respected franchises, and wins a super bowl... there's often a reason executives aren't knocking on your door.

There's only been one head coach who won a Super Bowl when his first head coaching gig was 50+ years old. Barry Switzer. There's a reason for that. Because when a guy under everyone's radar goes unnoticed for that long, there were probably red flags.

DaWolf 12-27-2012 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9244582)
Sure, but who's fault is it we need a different HC (third in 5 years)? Who built the scouting department?

Pioli can point fingers at others to blame, but those guys are in place because of Pioli. It might be different if Hunt had to weigh Pioli's successes versus his failures, but there really aren't enough successes to even make a debate of it.

This decision will essentially let us know what we have in Hunt. Either he is a bottom-line type guy who listens to his constituents, or he is a sentimental and loyal fellow like his dad who can overlook failure to a point in order to give a person he likes and respects another shot to correct their errors. If it is the latter, we are in trouble...

Ace Gunner 12-27-2012 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9244502)
I wouldn't go that far.

But I've brought up at least 10 times and heard no response... why is it that when the 2009 Chiefs make the playoffs in a Mickey Mouse schedule it's considered a fluke. When Arians does the same thing, the same fans think he's the best thing since sliced bread.

Arians is barely beating really crap competition and he's doing it behind a QB who even as a rookie is 10 times better than anyone the Chiefs have had in 10 years. People who believe he's one of the top choices are chasing after shiny objects.

there's nothing to stretch here but to deny the truth -- Pagano's team. Not Arians' call. To say Arians makes adjustments during games is like saying Luck plays well during the fourth qtr -- it's what these folks do and they do it under Pagano's plan. That's not extraordinary for them and it is the reason they are on Pagano's team.

As for the wins -- they are MOTR in all three phases. They caught the Vikes during a bad stretch, had a few breaks during other games. All will come back to earth for them against Houston.

Arians deserves a shot as HC somewhere. He's obviously going to get one since the HC pool has been so poor over the past 2 decades. Arians is a clever coach, not sure I'd say he's going to be a champ at HC though, but who knows. Especially with the league wide parity changes and NBA like rules etc, I guess any avg HC can go yard nowadays.

Hammock Parties 12-27-2012 07:58 PM

lol @ Laz being a McCluster fan.

Mr_Tomahawk 12-27-2012 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9244228)
Dorsey would be a fantastic hire.

This.

I'll ****ing eat all day from the Packers Tree.

ROYC75 12-27-2012 08:04 PM

I love this place.

CP basically goes nuts Clark hires Pioli, the majority of the FB world says, Good or Great Hire!

Pioli hires Todd Haley,CP basically goes nuts, the majority of the FB world says, Good or a Great hire. Up and coming new OC, great open offensive mind with SB experience.

Pioli gets Matt Cassel,many CP and Chiefs fans goes nuts about a QB that knows the Patriot Way.Many CP and Chief fans revolt, cuss, kick and scream because of Cassel's 1 year success and millions of dollars.

CP and Chiefs fans goes nuts over Haley & Pioli feuds,gum & candy wrappers, wire taps, etc .... Chiefs fans embarrassed by Pioli & Todd, blames Todd.

Kent Bab exposes Pioli,long after Whitlock feuds with Pioli ... CP & Chief fans wake up. Pioli is a dictator!

Now in the wake of Pioli may stay as long as he hires a new HC and gets a new ( finally a 1st rd ) QB ?

Chiefs fans are their own worst enemy when it comes to wanting something. It's damn easy to just accept and go with the flow and bitch along the way.

aturnis 12-27-2012 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 9244443)
changing ... deflecting .... spinning



besides McCluster because a productive slot receiver as soon, as Haley got fired.


we add a decent QB and a speed receiver and he will be even more productive.

DMC was not worth a 2nd round , pick(i hated it the moment it happened) but the reality is that todd Haley SUCKED as a head coach.

Pioli's mistakes doesn't absolve Haley from his ... it just adds another mistake to Pioli's list.

OCD about Pioli is just beyond stupid

Haley did not suck as a head coach. You're just a butthurt little girl who apparently would gladly be somebody's puppet, rather than stand up and have some balls and dignity. The guy wasn't allowed to choose his own starting lineup for ****s sake.

BTW, McCluster is on pace to produce 300 yds less than last season.

aturnis 12-27-2012 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROYC75 (Post 9244683)
I love this place.

CP basically goes nuts Clark hires Pioli, the majority of the FB world says, Good or Great Hire!

Pioli hires Todd Haley,CP basically goes nuts, the majority of the FB world says, Good or a Great hire. Up and coming new OC, great open offensive mind with SB experience.

Pioli gets Matt Cassel,many CP and Chiefs fans goes nuts about a QB that knows the Patriot Way.Many CP and Chief fans revolt, cuss, kick and scream because of Cassel's 1 year success and millions of dollars.

CP and Chiefs fans goes nuts over Haley & Pioli feuds,gum & candy wrappers, wire taps, etc .... Chiefs fans embarrassed by Pioli & Todd, blames Todd.

Kent Bab exposes Pioli,long after Whitlock feuds with Pioli ... CP & Chief fans wake up. Pioli is a dictator!

Now in the wake of Pioli may stay as long as he hires a new HC and gets a new ( finally a 1st rd ) QB ?

Chiefs fans are their own worst enemy when it comes to wanting something. It's damn easy to just accept and go with the flow and bitch along the way.

Who's said Pioli could stay?

notorious 12-27-2012 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 9244744)
Who's said Pioli could stay?

This.

I have yet to see one person say that.

Pasta Little Brioni 12-27-2012 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 9244740)
Haley did not suck as a head coach. You're just a butthurt little girl who apparently would gladly be somebody's puppet, rather than stand up and have some balls and dignity. The guy wasn't allowed to choose his own starting lineup for ****s sake.

BTW, McCluster is on pace to produce 300 yds less than last season.

Disagree with that. Did Pioli force him to have that abortion of a training camp? Did he force them to fake punt at their own 20 in a close game at the time? Act like a complete buffoon on the sideline? Lack the required people skills to succeed as an NFL Head Coach? Continue to play Tyler Palko?

Sure Pioli was a failure, Cassel too, but so was Haley.

Fat Elvis 12-27-2012 09:13 PM

I'm not too keen on Dorsey as GM, and here's why: I think he would try to trade for Flynn from the Seahawks and then draft Luke Joekel with the #1 pick.

I want a HC hired first and then a GM who will go out and get the players that the HC wants and needs for their vision to be implemented.

The head coach I want is Chip Kelly. I want an aggressive, shit down your throat playing and coaching style. Chip Kelly will do that in the NFL. I can handle losing. As a Chiefs fan, I'm used to it. At least go balls to the wall instead of playing not to lose (when you are already behind).

chiefzilla1501 12-27-2012 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9244775)
Disagree with that. Did Pioli force him to have that abortion of a training camp? Did he force them to fake punt at their own 20 in a close game at the time? Act like a complete buffoon on the sideline? Lack the required people skills to succeed as an NFL Head Coach? Continue to play Tyler Palko?

Sure Pioli was a failure, Cassel too, but so was Haley.

The first two points were Haley, but not fireable offenses.

Completely wrong on the last 3 points. Who cares if he was a buffoon on the sidelines? Cowher and Gruden were notorious for doing the same damn thing, an dhtose guys are considered heroes. Did he lack the people skills? Last time I checked, the players he coached got better under his watch then became complete losers when he left -- his people skills are the exact same as Tom Coughlin's. Tyler Palko was a lot more Pioli than it was Haley.

Pioli and Cassel didn't fail because of anyone but themselves. Haley was severely limited because of Pioli and Cassel. Because of that... we don't know what Haley would have done in a better situation. I think he will do well if hired in Arizona and it will only make a bigger mockery of Pioli's shit show.

cdcox 12-27-2012 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9244257)

I think firing Haley was a HUGE mistake and doubling and tripling down on Cassel is what is gonna get his ass fired.

If hiring Haley was a HUGE mistake, in comparison hiring Romeo would be equivalent to bringing Cassel back as starter in '13. This team even with Cassel was capable of at least 6 wins with competent coaching.

Brock 12-27-2012 09:50 PM

Taking bowe and breaston off the field ina 7 point game is a firing offense. **** that guy.

DeezNutz 12-27-2012 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9244793)
The first two points were Haley, but not fireable offenses.

Completely wrong on the last 3 points. Who cares if he was a buffoon on the sidelines? Cowher and Gruden were notorious for doing the same damn thing, an dhtose guys are considered heroes. Did he lack the people skills? Last time I checked, the players he coached got better under his watch then became complete losers when he left -- his people skills are the exact same as Tom Coughlin's. Tyler Palko was a lot more Pioli than it was Haley.

Pioli and Cassel didn't fail because of anyone but themselves. Haley was severely limited because of Pioli and Cassel. Because of that... we don't know what Haley would have done in a better situation. I think he will do well if hired in Arizona and it will only make a bigger mockery of Pioli's shit show.

lol.

Pasta Little Brioni 12-27-2012 09:57 PM

Not even going there again zilla...

Deberg_1990 12-27-2012 10:05 PM

I wonder if the Colts try and keep Arians? Whats the condition of Pagano? What if his health gets worse during the offseason?

Saccopoo 12-27-2012 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 9244323)
I agree, it all comes down to Pioli being a complete ****ing reerun with Cassel.

Bullshit.

It comes down to:

- Cassel

- Being a prick with the media

- Shutting the team off from the fan base

- Being and egocentric meglomaniac (the Chiefs do not have a Director of Scouting because Pioli thinks he knows ****ing everything)

- Every first round pick he's had

- Trading up for ****ing tight ends

- Candy wrappers

- CIA Brown Shirts around the stadium

- Romeo Crennel

- Brian Daboll

- Brady Quinn

And ever other shithole thing that has happened to this franchise in the past four years.

Let's face facts - this Chiefs team, in the fourth year of the Pioli regime, stands as one of the historically bad teams in the history of the NFL. Samurai used to commit seppuku for an 1/8th of what has happened here with the Chiefs this year.

This guy was brought in to, quote his own words, "win championships."

This, the 2012 season - his fourth year as GM, is not winning championships. It's the mother ****ing Titanic. The ****ing Black Plague of modern football. It doesn't get worse than this. It's ****ing horrible.

This ****ing guy should give back every single cent he stole from this team.

**** Pioli.

The guy sucks shit out of a stinking skunks festered ass.

**** him with Mecca's toilet brush.

**** this ****ing guy.

Millions of dollars and he fields the worst NFL team in the last 50 years.

**** YOU PIOLI!!!

DeezNutz 12-27-2012 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 9244903)
Bullshit.

It comes down to:

- Cassel

- Being a prick with the media

- Shutting the team off from the fan base

- Being and egocentric meglomaniac (the Chiefs do not have a Director of Scouting because Pioli thinks he knows ****ing everything)

- Every first round pick he's had

- Trading up for ****ing tight ends

- Candy wrappers

- CIA Brown Shirts around the stadium

- Romeo Crennel

- Brian Daboll

- Brady Quinn

And ever other shithole thing that has happened to this franchise in the past four years.

Let's face facts - this Chiefs team, in the fourth year of the Pioli regime, stands as one of the historically bad teams in the history of the NFL. Samurai used to commit seppuku for an 1/8th of what has happened here with the Chiefs this year.

This guy was brought in to, quote his own words, "win championships."

This, the 2012 season - his fourth year as GM, is not winning championships. It's the mother ****ing Titanic. The ****ing Black Plague of modern football. It doesn't get worse than this. It's ****ing horrible.

This ****ing guy should give back every single cent he stole from this team.

**** Pioli.

The guy sucks shit out of a stinking skunks festered ass.

**** him with Mecca's toilet brush.

**** this ****ing guy.

Millions of dollars and he fields the worst NFL team in the last 50 years.

**** YOU PIOLI!!!

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lfpbv1b6Vo1qc3ioj.gif

chiefzilla1501 12-27-2012 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9244881)
Not even going there again zilla...

Then stop using the bad argument that he couldn't coach players or that he was the sole reason tyler palko started.

Hammock Parties 12-27-2012 10:41 PM

Mecca never uses his toilet brush, I'm quite certain of this, so we need to find someone else's toilet brush to **** him with. I'm thinking luv's toilet brush will suffice.

chiefzilla1501 12-27-2012 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9244871)
lol.

It just blows my mind that people refuse to give any credit whatsoever to Haley for making a lot of our players better. Nor will they acknowledge that the drop off this season has as much to do with Romeo sucking as a coach as it does that Haley was maybe getting something out of these players.

But again, this is exaggeration planet. You're right. Haley did absolutely nothing right. Nothing.

DeezNutz 12-27-2012 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9244988)
It just blows my mind that people refuse to give any credit whatsoever to Haley for making a lot of our players better. Nor will they acknowledge that the drop off this season has as much to do with Romeo sucking as a coach as it does that Haley was maybe getting something out of these players.

But again, this is exaggeration planet. You're right. Haley did absolutely nothing right. Nothing.

Do you read what you write?

Who are the players whom Haley "improved"? Bowe? Was a stud before Haley arrived. DJ? Potentially true. Still a stud this year, so definitely not a "loser." Hali? See DJ. Flowers? Nope. Stud before Haley arrived. Albert? Nope. Good before Haley arrived and good after.

Oh, you meant "losers" in a general sense? Well that was true during Haley's tenure, too.

Ironic that you say this is "exaggeration planet" after making such an inaccurate and hyperbolic initial statement.

The Bad Guy 12-27-2012 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis (Post 9244789)
I'm not too keen on Dorsey as GM, and here's why: I think he would try to trade for Flynn from the Seahawks and then draft Luke Joekel with the #1 pick.

I want a HC hired first and then a GM who will go out and get the players that the HC wants and needs for their vision to be implemented.

The head coach I want is Chip Kelly. I want an aggressive, shit down your throat playing and coaching style. Chip Kelly will do that in the NFL. I can handle losing. As a Chiefs fan, I'm used to it. At least go balls to the wall instead of playing not to lose (when you are already behind).

If Joel Philbin passed on Matt Flynn, I don't have any reason to think that anyone else from the Packers tree would want him either.

el borracho 12-27-2012 11:30 PM

Four complete seasons and the team does not have a QB; does not have a Head Coach; doesn't have an Offensive nor a Defensive Coordinator. It doesn't matter what the rest of the team looks like, without those pieces you have nothing. I think it is safe to say that Pioli has failed about as hard as one can fail.

chiefzilla1501 12-27-2012 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9245048)
Do you read what you write?

Who are the players whom Haley "improved"? Bowe? Was a stud before Haley arrived. DJ? Potentially true. Still a stud this year, so definitely not a "loser." Hali? See DJ. Flowers? Nope. Stud before Haley arrived. Albert? Nope. Good before Haley arrived and good after.

Oh, you meant "losers" in a general sense? Well that was true during Haley's tenure, too.

Ironic that you say this is "exaggeration planet" after making such an inaccurate and hyperbolic initial statement.

Albert wasn't "good" before Haley arrived. He played in a pistol offense that masked the fact that he had no technique. Haley's decision to force Albert to cut weight and coach up on technique was a ballsy move, and a terrific move, and Albert progressed from a swinging gate to a top-tier left tackle. The idea that Bowe was a stud that didn't improve is nonsense. He was a good player when Haley got here. But he changed from a guy who was 10 lbs overweight in training camp to a guy who started working for months in an intense offseason training program with Larry Fitzgerald, which never happens unless Haley was there. And guess who started losing focus and dropping the easy ones again this year? Bowe. DJ went from a freelancer, to a focused missile under Haley, to a freelancer again under RAC who plays with no discipline. Eric Berry improved to the point of an almost dominating performance against Baltimore, then... you guessed it, became a freelancer again. Hali was asked to cut weight and was in tremendous physical condition, and guess what, he regressed under Romeo. Young guys like Asamoah and Hudson and Houston... you could see steady progression in these guys (Houston was a complete nonfactor early in the year). Jovan Belcher... limited by talent, but improved every year. Tyson Jackson -- played about to his ceiling under Haley.

By the way, all these guys got far worse after RAC took over in 2013. The team was in peak physical condition. You had guys working their tail off in practice. And you had freelancers playing with discipline. Last year, we had people laughably claiming RAC deserved credit for that and Haley didn't. How well is that theory holding up now?

It is completely exaggeration to say nobody got better. Apart from maybe McCluster, name another player on this team who didn't reach his potential? And Cassel doesn't count, because he didn't have talent.

RealSNR 12-27-2012 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis (Post 9244789)
I'm not too keen on Dorsey as GM, and here's why: I think he would try to trade for Flynn from the Seahawks and then draft Luke Joekel with the #1 pick.

I want a HC hired first and then a GM who will go out and get the players that the HC wants and needs for their vision to be implemented.

The head coach I want is Chip Kelly. I want an aggressive, shit down your throat playing and coaching style. Chip Kelly will do that in the NFL. I can handle losing. As a Chiefs fan, I'm used to it. At least go balls to the wall instead of playing not to lose (when you are already behind).

I would have to hope that he's not that stupid. Hopefully if there's one thing Packers people learn from being in the system is that the system is only as good as you make it. Trying to siphon off from the greatness you were a part of is a mistake made by reeruns like Pioli, who thinks building a great football team means eating the corn out of the shit that came out of the asshole of the Patriots organization. Why does he think that? Because that's all he's ever known, and that's all he was ever trained to do.

Schneider did sign away Flynn, but considering his team's draft position in 2012, I wouldn't have been too optimistic about finding a franchise guy in the first round either, especially since Miami traded UP to go get Tannehill. I have to think that the team's willingness to go with Wilson once they discovered him on the team is indicative of the way they view acquiring talent.

RealSNR 12-27-2012 11:43 PM

Are we still talking about Todd Haley on this forum? :facepalm:

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/WaWI5usBZ4M" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

DeezNutz 12-27-2012 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9245105)
Albert wasn't "good" before Haley arrived.

Guess where most people will stop reading.

I know, I know. Haley, our last coaching messiah, broke Bowe down to build him back up into a 1000-yard receiver who still has lapses in concentration.

And the team lost 467 pounds collectively! No sizzle! The right 53!

Cassel was clearly the great albatross that doomed what would otherwise be the brilliant coaching career of the best golfer in the NFL. But I have this one lingering question: If Haley was building everyone up, and all the players were ascending under him, why did the team play so poorly in '11? Fresh off a promising playoff performance in '10, that team was poised for greatness.

He was a piece of ****ing shit HC. This doesn't necessarily mean that everything he touched turned to ****--after all, the man isn't Pioli--but he wasn't anywhere close to being good.

But we can continue to blame everyone else for Haley's failings. No way. No ****ing way was he really as bad as the results suggest. The stats lie.

The Bad Guy 12-27-2012 11:53 PM

The Steelers offense certainly isn't better with Todd Haley.

DeezNutz 12-27-2012 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9245137)
The Steelers offense certainly isn't better with Todd Haley.

Who could win with that QB? I mean RB; I mean offensive line. I mean GM. I mean...

All of the evidence is wrong. Wrong I say.

The Bad Guy 12-28-2012 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9245142)
Who could win with that QB? I mean RB; I mean offensive line. I mean GM. I mean...

All of the evidence is wrong. Wrong I say.

Mike Wallace hates his offense. No running back can get into any rhythm.

Anyone praising Haley needs their head checked. Praise him, but knock Arians?

GTFO.

chiefzilla1501 12-28-2012 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9245132)
Guess where most people will stop reading.

Which is exactly why you lose credibility. Three years ago, we were talking about drafting Russell Okung and moving Albert to Guard because he just wasn't good enough to play left tackle. Today, he's a top tier left tackle and people want to franchise tag him and are enraged at the thought that Pioli may choose to not re-sign him. He improved dramatically. It's ridiculous to suggest he's not significantly better than he was as a rookie.

Quote:

I know, I know. Haley, our last coaching messiah, broke Bowe down to build him back up into a 1000-yard receiver who still has lapses in concentration.
Bowe didn't take the game seriously enough to even show up to camp in shape. He had to cheat to cut weight. Under Haley, he willingly began committing to the game, training on his off-time with Fitzgerald, and hitting peak physical condition. Those things never happened before Haley got there. He was a good receiver before Haley, but his work ethic and focus improved dramatically.


Quote:

And the team lost 467 pounds collectively! No sizzle! The right 53!
And they never showed up to camp out of shape. Albert played a different brand of football and it's turned him into a top-notch left tackle. Hali lost 10-20 lbs and became a pro bowl OLB. Dorsey never showed up to camp out of shape again. Name one player that got worse because Haley asked them to cut weight? CP threw a shit fit that Haley would dare ask Albert to play at such an ungodly low weight. Guess who was wrong on that.

Quote:

Cassel was clearly the great albatross that doomed what would otherwise be the brilliant coaching career of the best golfer in the NFL. But I have this one lingering question: If Haley was building everyone up, and all the players were ascending under him, why did the team play so poorly in '11? Fresh off a promising playoff performance in '10, that team was poised for greatness.
You don't think that has anything to do with the idea that our QB was so bad that our entire offense had to revolve around Jamaal Charles, a player who only played 1 game in 2011? Or the fact that they had to play 4 games under Tyler Palko (a QB that was only there because Pioli refused to listen to guys like Haley who were screaming for QB depth?)

Quote:

He was a piece of ****ing shit HC. This doesn't necessarily mean that everything he touched turned to ****--after all, the man isn't Pioli--but he wasn't anywhere close to being good.

But we can continue to blame everyone else for Haley's failings. No way. No ****ing way was he really as bad as the results suggest. The stats lie.
We've acknowledged he had a piece of shit GM who dictated a shitty QB decision. We've acknowledged that no team can win these days without a franchise QB (let alone a good QB). I have acknowledged Haley's shortcomings. I don't know if he would become a better coach with a better GM. But the level of blame that gets put on his shoulder is ridiculous, as is the refusal to give him credit where credit is due. This place is exaggeration planet. They exaggerate how bad people they hate are, and exaggerate how great people they like are. Haley is no exception.

DaWolf 12-28-2012 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9244793)
Pioli and Cassel didn't fail because of anyone but themselves. Haley was severely limited because of Pioli and Cassel. Because of that... we don't know what Haley would have done in a better situation. I think he will do well if hired in Arizona and it will only make a bigger mockery of Pioli's shit show.

Haley did plenty to contribute to the situation. And the immaturity which which he reacted to it all told me enough about why he is not suited to lead any organization or locker room. Arizona would be no better than average if they hired him, and I don't know what quality coordinators would ever want to work for him. He is not suited to be a head coach...

Crush 12-28-2012 12:26 AM

Haley called a Mike Cox FB pass to Matt Cassel in the last game of the 2009 season against Denver. Todd Haley, purported offensive genious (CP spelling) and quality HC, thought a Mike Cox to Matt Cassel pass was a good idea. That single fact completely negates any supposed positives that come with Todd Haley.

The Bad Guy 12-28-2012 12:33 AM

Shocker, Zilla thinks he'll do well if hired in Arizona with really no basis for such an opinion.

What coordinators are going to coach with him? Pioli is a smug one who sucks the penis who few want to work for, and Haley is in the same boat.

BossChief 12-28-2012 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9245132)
Guess where most people will stop reading.

I know, I know. Haley, our last coaching messiah, broke Bowe down to build him back up into a 1000-yard receiver who still has lapses in concentration.

And the team lost 467 pounds collectively! No sizzle! The right 53!

Cassel was clearly the great albatross that doomed what would otherwise be the brilliant coaching career of the best golfer in the NFL. But I have this one lingering question: If Haley was building everyone up, and all the players were ascending under him, why did the team play so poorly in '11? Fresh off a promising playoff performance in '10, that team was poised for greatness.

He was a piece of ****ing shit HC. This doesn't necessarily mean that everything he touched turned to ****--after all, the man isn't Pioli--but he wasn't anywhere close to being good.

But we can continue to blame everyone else for Haley's failings. No way. No ****ing way was he really as bad as the results suggest. The stats lie.

Let me give you Matt Cassel and take Charles away, for the year, during game 2...along with Berry and Moeaki being already out for the year.

Look at the final records in the AFCW last year and tell me Haley doesn't win the division a second year in a row with a healthy team and a ****ing horrid quarterback situation.

The Bad Guy 12-28-2012 12:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9245221)
Let me give you Matt Cassel and take Charles away, for the year, during game 2...along with Berry and Moeaki being already out for the year.

Look at the final records in the AFCW last year and tell me Haley doesn't win the division a second year in a row with a healthy team and a ****ing horrid quarterback situation.

That's damn near impossible to say. You don't know how the team would have played against Green Bay, or the closeout game in Denver.

chiefzilla1501 12-28-2012 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9245159)
Mike Wallace hates his offense. No running back can get into any rhythm.

Anyone praising Haley needs their head checked. Praise him, but knock Arians?

GTFO.

I don't think Haley is an offensive guru by any stretch. But I've seen a lot of Steelers games with buddies who are diehard Steeler fans. You are exaggerating the problem. The RBs can't get into rhythm because Mendenhall has missed almost the entire season. And what RB can get into rhythm when you have three offensive line starters out?

I know Wallace hates the offense. Big Ben does too. But you have to keep in mind that the Rooneys fired Arians because they were tired of seeing Big Ben freelance and get hit 10 times a game. The new offense has Big Ben getting rid of the ball faster and doing less freelancing, and that opens up less opportunity for Wallace. You can disagree with the philosophy if you want to, but that's coming from the Rooneys down.

chiefzilla1501 12-28-2012 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9245217)
Shocker, Zilla thinks he'll do well if hired in Arizona with really no basis for such an opinion.

What coordinators are going to coach with him? Pioli is a smug one who sucks the penis who few want to work for, and Haley is in the same boat.

I think he'll do well in Arizona because he runs a disciplined team that works hard and responds well to coaching, which is my top criteria for a head coach.

Your point about coordinators is fair. I don't make excuses for stuff like that. And maybe Haley is purely insufferable to work with. But I also have heard plenty to suggest that Pioli didn't give Haley any say whatsoever in decisions like this, including what kind of an offense they were going to run. So reason to be skeptical, but still want to see how he responds with a GM who gives him even a tiny voice in picking his own staff.

BossChief 12-28-2012 01:06 AM

Charles alone is worth 2-3 more wins.

Titty Meat 12-28-2012 02:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9245223)
That's damn near impossible to say. You don't know how the team would have played against Green Bay, or the closeout game in Denver.

We're talking about the same team who quit on Todd Haley during the Jets game right?

007 12-28-2012 02:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROYC75 (Post 9244683)
I love this place.

CP basically goes nuts Clark hires Pioli, the majority of the FB world says, Good or Great Hire!

Pioli hires Todd Haley,CP basically goes nuts, the majority of the FB world says, Good or a Great hire. Up and coming new OC, great open offensive mind with SB experience.

Pioli gets Matt Cassel,many CP and Chiefs fans goes nuts about a QB that knows the Patriot Way.Many CP and Chief fans revolt, cuss, kick and scream because of Cassel's 1 year success and millions of dollars.

CP and Chiefs fans goes nuts over Haley & Pioli feuds,gum & candy wrappers, wire taps, etc .... Chiefs fans embarrassed by Pioli & Todd, blames Todd.

Kent Bab exposes Pioli,long after Whitlock feuds with Pioli ... CP & Chief fans wake up. Pioli is a dictator!

Now in the wake of Pioli may stay as long as he hires a new HC and gets a new ( finally a 1st rd ) QB ?

Chiefs fans are their own worst enemy when it comes to wanting something. It's damn easy to just accept and go with the flow and bitch along the way.

Most wanted nothing to do with Cassel and a fairly good percentage also didn't like the Haley hire. Not sure where you are getting that MOST of CP went NUTS over those two unless you meant we went nuts with hate over it.

RealSNR 12-28-2012 03:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 9245362)
Most wanted nothing to do with Cassel and a fairly good percentage also didn't like the Haley hire. Not sure where you are getting that MOST of CP went NUTS over those two unless you meant we went nuts with hate over it.

Agreed. We have NOT been given what we want yet, which is a franchise QB.

Matt Cassel didn't count in 2009 and he doesn't count now.

BigRock 12-28-2012 05:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9245137)
The Steelers offense certainly isn't better with Todd Haley.

Provided they can manage the tall task of scoring at least 5 points at home against Cleveland on Sunday, the Steelers will have scored more points per game this year on offense (currently 20.3) than they did a year ago (19.4).

And that's with being in their first year in a new system, Mendenhall missing most of the year, Ben getting hurt, etc. etc. They were scoring 23 a game before Ben's injury, so the improvement could have been even better than the slightly better status it's currently at.

But even slightly better is still better.

RUSH 12-28-2012 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9245184)
Which is exactly why you lose credibility. Three years ago, we were talking about drafting Russell Okung and moving Albert to Guard because he just wasn't good enough to play left tackle. Today, he's a top tier left tackle and people want to franchise tag him and are enraged at the thought that Pioli may choose to not re-sign him. He improved dramatically. It's ridiculous to suggest he's not significantly better than he was as a rookie.

Didn't read your whole post but this is just false.

Albert had a great rookie season with Herm running the show and nobody reasonable was calling for Andre Smith, Eugene Monroe, or Jason Smith to replace him.

Albert began his struggles when Haley came in and had him lose 30-40 pounds. He then went on to struggle in 2009 and play average in 2010.

He's been an above average tackle in 2011 & 2012.

Did the weight loss help? Maybe. But let's not act like Albert didn't show he was on his way to becoming a premier left tackle before Haley got his hands on him. I would even say that he almost ruined him.

BlackHelicopters 12-28-2012 08:09 AM

Ferentz can probably make Stanzi All Pro.

FRCDFED 12-28-2012 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 9244323)
I agree, it all comes down to Pioli being a complete ****ing reerun with Cassel.

Cassel led to Haley's firing, Crennel's hiring as HC, completely alienating the fans, etc.


If Pioli is retained, say hello to Josh McDaniels.

Is it wrong to want Haley back?:hmmm:

DeezNutz 12-28-2012 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9245184)
Which is exactly why you lose credibility. Three years ago, we were talking about drafting Russell Okung and moving Albert to Guard because he just wasn't good enough to play left tackle.

Irony is nonstop. "We" sure as **** were not talking about moving Albert to guard, and "we" sure as **** were not talking about drafting Okung.

The above is a completely invented narrative for many of the posters on this board, including the vast majority of posters whom I interact with on this site. Hell, we've largely lambasted any suggestions of moving Albert, much like we used to mock individuals who decried the play of Carr.

chiefzilla1501 12-28-2012 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RUSH (Post 9245438)
Didn't read your whole post but this is just false.

Albert had a great rookie season with Herm running the show and nobody reasonable was calling for Andre Smith, Eugene Monroe, or Jason Smith to replace him.

Albert began his struggles when Haley came in and had him lose 30-40 pounds. He then went on to struggle in 2009 and play average in 2010.

He's been an above average tackle in 2011 & 2012.

Did the weight loss help? Maybe. But let's not act like Albert didn't show he was on his way to becoming a premier left tackle before Haley got his hands on him. I would even say that he almost ruined him.

He didnt have a great rookie season. He played decent for a rookie but a lot of his success is attributed to running a pistol offense where thigpen was basically throwing quickly to his first read from the shotgun. When they moved to a conventional offense, it was clear Albert struggled with his technique. the idea that he was on his way to greatness in his rookie season is completely wrong. Unless your suggestion is to run a gimmick offense forever.

The weight loss was a great move. Albert has become one of the better run blockers in the league because he can get upfield, and his strength in the draft was foot quickness, which he can use more now. His strength isn't playing as he did as a rookie, where he was basically throwing his body run absent any technique.

notorious 12-28-2012 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 9244903)
Bullshit.


Read the entire thread before calling bullshit.

chiefzilla1501 12-28-2012 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9245509)
Irony is nonstop. "We" sure as **** were not talking about moving Albert to guard, and "we" sure as **** were not talking about drafting Okung.

The above is a completely invented narrative for many of the posters on this board, including the vast majority of posters whom I interact with on this site. Hell, we've largely lambasted any suggestions of moving Albert, much like we used to mock individuals who decried the play of Carr.

No, it isn't invented. Nobody in their right mind would have called for Albert to be franchised. He was never crucified as cassel was, but he wasn't popular on the board either. I know, because I had to set a lot of people straight preaching patience on the guy because he was changing positions.

notorious 12-28-2012 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FRCDFED (Post 9245500)
Is it wrong to want Haley back?:hmmm:

I am not an expert, but he did have some qualities that I like in a HC.


I don't know if his obvious weaknesses were due to Cassel and Pioli.

FRCDFED 12-28-2012 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9245184)
Which is exactly why you lose credibility. Three years ago, we were talking about drafting Russell Okung and moving Albert to Guard because he just wasn't good enough to play left tackle. Today, he's a top tier left tackle and people want to franchise tag him and are enraged at the thought that Pioli may choose to not re-sign him. He improved dramatically. It's ridiculous to suggest he's not significantly better than he was as a rookie.


Bowe didn't take the game seriously enough to even show up to camp in shape. He had to cheat to cut weight. Under Haley, he willingly began committing to the game, training on his off-time with Fitzgerald, and hitting peak physical condition. Those things never happened before Haley got there. He was a good receiver before Haley, but his work ethic and focus improved dramatically.



And they never showed up to camp out of shape. Albert played a different brand of football and it's turned him into a top-notch left tackle. Hali lost 10-20 lbs and became a pro bowl OLB. Dorsey never showed up to camp out of shape again. Name one player that got worse because Haley asked them to cut weight? CP threw a shit fit that Haley would dare ask Albert to play at such an ungodly low weight. Guess who was wrong on that.


You don't think that has anything to do with the idea that our QB was so bad that our entire offense had to revolve around Jamaal Charles, a player who only played 1 game in 2011? Or the fact that they had to play 4 games under Tyler Palko (a QB that was only there because Pioli refused to listen to guys like Haley who were screaming for QB depth?)



We've acknowledged he had a piece of shit GM who dictated a shitty QB decision. We've acknowledged that no team can win these days without a franchise QB (let alone a good QB). I have acknowledged Haley's shortcomings. I don't know if he would become a better coach with a better GM. But the level of blame that gets put on his shoulder is ridiculous, as is the refusal to give him credit where credit is due. This place is exaggeration planet. They exaggerate how bad people they hate are, and exaggerate how great people they like are. Haley is no exception.

This

DeezNutz 12-28-2012 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9245526)
No, it isn't invented. Nobody in their right mind would have called for Albert to be franchised. He was never crucified as cassel was, but he wasn't popular on the board either. I know, because I had to set a lot of people straight preaching patience on the guy because he was changing positions.

There are always True Fans calling for LTs at the top of the draft.

This whole exchange is laughable, and I'm done debating the merits of a shitty HC. Teflon Todd with the tastiest rod in town.

Pasta Little Brioni 12-28-2012 08:55 AM

zilla that is such bullshit you fling all that shit and then make shit up about "everyone" wanting to move Alber to guard. That's crap.

FAX 12-28-2012 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 9245528)
I am not an expert, but he did have some qualities that I like in a HC.


I don't know if his obvious weaknesses were due to Cassel and Pioli.

My theory on this has been articulated before. I liked Haley. I liked his attitude and I liked his commitment to winning. It's a damn shame that he was paired with a certified asswipe like Dr. Evil whom I firmly believe actively undermined his efforts to turn this team into a successful franchise.

I never fully understood why people made so much of his "antics" on the sideline. NFL HCs are always going off for one reason or another and are rarely called out for it. Yet, when Haley showed some emotion (which I prefer to Roleo's or Herm's narcoleptic zombie demeanor) people went nuts ... never got that.

He was also a guy who studied the game. It interesting that the "new NFL math" is gaining traction when it comes to fourth down attempts, fakes, etc. Haley was trashed for his creativity and understanding of the percentages. If given another opportunity, I think he will eventually be a very successful head coach in this league. Meanwhile, we'll probably still be trying to figure out how to rebuild one more time.

FAX

Pasta Little Brioni 12-28-2012 09:00 AM

Team quit on him. Says it all right there.

DeezNutz 12-28-2012 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 9245548)
My theory on this has been articulated before. I liked Haley. I liked his attitude and I liked his commitment to winning. It's a damn shame that he was paired with a certified asswipe like Dr. Evil whom I firmly believe actively undermined his efforts to turn this team into a successful franchise.

I never fully understood why people made so much of his "antics" on the sideline. NFL HCs are always going off for one reason or another and are rarely called out for it. Yet, when Haley showed some emotion (which I prefer to Roleo's or Herm's narcoleptic zombie demeanor) people went nuts ... never got that.

He was also a guy who studied the game. It interesting that the "new NFL math" is gaining traction when it comes to fourth down attempts, fakes, etc. Haley was trashed for his creativity and understanding of the percentages. If given another opportunity, I think he will eventually be a very successful head coach in this league. Meanwhile, we'll probably still be trying to figure out how to rebuild one more time.

FAX

The problem is that Haley didn't understand the percentages. Inconsistency was his consistency, as he'd go for it deep in his own territory, yet punt on the opponent's side in a manageable fourth-down situation.

FAX 12-28-2012 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9245555)
The problem is that Haley didn't understand the percentages. Inconsistency was his consistency, as he'd go for it deep in his own territory, yet punt on the opponent's side in a manageable fourth-down situation.

One man's inconsistency is another man's surprise attack, Mr. DeezNutz.

Nevertheless, you may be right. Those decisions are situational, though. In order to agree with you, my brain would have to absorb the game circumstances associated with each call.

There's another variable, as well ... who was actually making the call? For example, was it Weis or Methuselah or Haley himself who make the call to run Thomas Jones around right end on 4th and 2 (or whatever it was)? So far as we know, it was Weis. Of course, Weis (a proven megalomaniac in his own right) would probably deny that.

Oh ... and as for "the team quit on him", Mr. PGM ... think about it ... when your GM is proactively busting your balls behind your back on a daily basis, it's a little difficult to lead. I challenge any HC in the entire league to retain his respected leadership status under those circumstances. It's impossible. Cannot be done. No way. No how.

FAX

Pasta Little Brioni 12-28-2012 09:13 AM

Mr. FAX, it's the NFL win or GTFO

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-28-2012 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 9244230)
Yeah sure. Pioli is still credible as a personnel expert even after choosing cassel over orton, or any other qb he could have had.

No shit. What a piece of garbage this article is.

Ferentz/Pioli?

LMAO

Garbage.

chiefzilla1501 12-28-2012 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9245541)
zilla that is such bullshit you fling all that shit and then make shit up about "everyone" wanting to move Alber to guard. That's crap.

Fine, not everyone wanted to move him to guard. But lots of people gave up on him as a left tackle or regarded him as a swinging gate. The idea that he was widely conSidered a top notch left tackle years ago is complete baloney.

chiefzilla1501 12-28-2012 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9245550)
Team quit on him. Says it all right there.

So we should fire every coach who's team shows up uninspired for one week? Even after it was sheer motivation that almost had us beating Pittsburgh and beating even a hapless Chicago team behind palko? Because we didn't compete in those games because of our passing or running game.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.