ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Goodbye Glenn Dorsey (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=271096)

Ace Gunner 03-13-2013 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smith2Bench (Post 9494231)
Actually, we just lost our NT, Soapaoga to Free agency so Dorsey will probably compete with Ian Williams and a 2013 draft pick for the 3-4 nose.

Soapoaga was good at holding the point as a NT, but didn't make plays.

I know Dorsey was an end for some reason at KC, but how was his bull rushing ability and how did he hold up against double teams?

bull rushing?


Do you like shrimp gumbo? then you will love Gumbo Dorsey.

Direckshun 03-13-2013 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clyde Frog (Post 9493785)
He was drafted as a LS

That is the craziest shit in the history of crazy shit.

I don't know what's crazier, that the Chiefs DRAFTED A LONG SNAPPER, or that that long snapper became one of the greatest sack artists in the NFL of the past five years.

BlackHelicopters 03-13-2013 04:16 PM

Not a single tear was shed.

Ace Gunner 03-13-2013 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 9494356)
That is the craziest shit in the history of crazy shit.

I don't know what's crazier, that the Chiefs DRAFTED A LONG SNAPPER, or that that long snapper became one of the greatest sack artists in the NFL of the past five years.

partially true -- they liked he could play both positions

Smith2Bench 03-13-2013 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls (Post 9494339)
bull rushing?


Do you like shrimp gumbo? then you will love Gumbo Dorsey.

lol

Damn

Ace Gunner 03-13-2013 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smith2Bench (Post 9494412)
lol

Damn

I know your team is desperate for DL. at this point I bet you know how I know this:D

srsly, if he makes the cut, your team has slipped. he's like watching a giant sized water balloon being batted around by a small crowd of seal hunters.

Smith2Bench 03-13-2013 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls (Post 9494455)
I know your team is desperate for DL. at this point I bet you know how I know this:D

srsly, if he makes the cut, your team has slipped. he's like watching a giant sized water balloon being batted around by a small crowd of seal hunters.

At worst, he can be a rotational player. I wouldn't be to upset if that happened.

I assume he's not goin to be expensive.

'Hamas' Jenkins 03-13-2013 04:41 PM

He'll probably turn into Casey Hampton, because Chiefs.

Makes me sad. He was a disappointment, but I really liked him. I really wonder how much that leg injury impacted him, because he was as dominant an interior lineman as the SEC had in a decade before getting hurt.

Consistent1 03-13-2013 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gblowfish (Post 9493556)
Run right at him. That's where the hole is.

Those ISO type plays only work if the other guys **** up.

Setsuna 03-13-2013 06:07 PM

I sense a lot of butt hurt in this thread.

DaKCMan AP 03-13-2013 06:09 PM

The jersey is dead. :(

Saccopoo 03-13-2013 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 9494356)
That is the craziest shit in the history of crazy shit.

I don't know what's crazier, that the Chiefs DRAFTED A LONG SNAPPER, or that that long snapper became one of the greatest sack artists in the NFL of the past five years.

Actually, that's how Vermeil sold him to Peterson. Vermeil loved him coming out of college, but Peterson didn't. That he had versatility to long snap got Vermeil his guy. There was no way in hell he was going to be the long snapper, but that's how Vermeil sold it.

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 03-13-2013 06:25 PM

Meh. Moved on long ago. Won't really miss him as he was part of some terrible Defensive line units.

mcaj22 03-13-2013 06:27 PM

going to be a lot of butt hurt fans when ole Glenn has 6 or 7 sacks out of the NT position for the 9ers this year

PRIEST 03-13-2013 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gblowfish (Post 9493564)
We should have traded him straight up for A Smiff and saved those picks.





This

penbrook 03-13-2013 06:37 PM

Per Niners Nation

Dorsey: Positive atmosphere. Can feel it when you walk in the building. Like a big family. High-fiving each other. Different environment

Hammock Parties 03-13-2013 07:08 PM

The 49ers got him for 2 years and $7 million. LMAO

RyFo18 03-13-2013 07:18 PM

Good for Dorsey. Wish him the best w/ a great organization.

In58men 03-13-2013 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbook (Post 9494999)
Per Niners Nation

Dorsey: Positive atmosphere. Can feel it when you walk in the building. Like a big family. High-fiving each other. Different environment

We'll Thomas Jones that sissy ass locker room and then Belcher it right in the face

Rasputin 03-13-2013 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gblowfish (Post 9493564)
We should have traded him straight up for A Smiff and saved those picks.

<a href="http://beta.photobucket.com/images/yep" target="_blank"><img src="http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s120/Sudaj_photo/Yep.jpg" border="0" alt="yep photo: ... Yep ... Yep.jpg"/></a>

DJ's left nut 03-13-2013 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9495093)
The 49ers got him for 2 years and $7 million. LMAO

I'd rather have Dorsey than DeVito and I'd much rather have Dorsey at his figure over DeVito at his.

We really screwed the pooch on the DE position thus far.

J Diddy 03-13-2013 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smith2Bench (Post 9494231)
Actually, we just lost our NT, Soapaoga to Free agency so Dorsey will probably compete with Ian Williams and a 2013 draft pick for the 3-4 nose.

Soapoaga was good at holding the point as a NT, but didn't make plays.

I know Dorsey was an end for some reason at KC, but how was his bull rushing ability and how did he hold up against double teams?

LMAO @ Dorsey Bull rushing

Sorter 03-13-2013 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9495373)
I'd rather have Dorsey than DeVito and I'd much rather have Dorsey at his figure over DeVito at his.

We really screwed the pooch on the DE position thus far.

We're ****ed. The Spanish have bullfighting, the Irish have drinking, and the Chiefs have whiffing on 3 techs.

lcarus 03-13-2013 10:53 PM

Goodbye, dear Glenn. I truly will miss cutting your average ass in Madden in favor of a defensive end who can make the occasional ****ing PLAY

J Diddy 03-13-2013 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ponderception (Post 9496104)
We're ****ed. The Spanish have bullfighting, the Irish have drinking, and the Chiefs have whiffing on 3 techs.

At least with Cassel we had a drinking game that involved a shot every time he overthrew a receiver.

Had to quit watching games because halfway through the preseason my liver started to tank and I was shitting myself too often.

Sorter 03-13-2013 10:55 PM

I'll miss watching Allen Bailey out perform Dorsey as a rookie playing the 3.

DaWolf 03-13-2013 10:56 PM

Good luck to Dorsey in SF. Hard worker who never complained. Hopefully he can stay healthy; always seemed like he had some sort of a leg ailment...

lcarus 03-13-2013 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ponderception (Post 9496126)
I'll miss watching Allen Bailey out perform Dorsey as a rookie playing the 3.

Now we get to watch Allen Bailey outperform The ****ing Penguin.

http://viewsfromthesofa.files.wordpr...05/penguin.jpg

Sorter 03-13-2013 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 9496124)
At least with Cassel we had a drinking game that involved a shot every time he overthrew a receiver.

Had to quit watching games because halfway through the preseason my liver started to tank and I was shitting myself too often.

I told my liver to buck up and that it was going to be a long few years.


My liver has hated me since.

Sorter 03-13-2013 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 9496134)
Now we get to watch Allen Bailey outperform The ****ing Penguin.

http://viewsfromthesofa.files.wordpr...05/penguin.jpg

LMAO

lcarus 03-13-2013 10:59 PM

Yes. It's true. Denver gets Welker. We get....

http://viewsfromthesofa.files.wordpr...05/penguin.jpg

Eh, I heard we was ok. Maybe if we're lucky, he'll bite off Clady's nose.

jd34 03-13-2013 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9494177)
Where the **** is this NT shit coming from?

Everywhere I've seen it has Dorsey basically backing up either DE spot in SF. Ian Williams would be next up for the NT job in SF.

SF boards are saying he will likely line up at NT most of the time but shift to DT with Justin Smith in nickel situations. The NT goes out of the game for another DB when they go nickel. Aldon Smith and McDonald are DEs in the nickel. Ian Williams is a backup. They will still draft another DL if the right guy comes up. They have a lot of talent but thin at DL. When Justin went down last season their pass rush went down with him.

Sorter 03-13-2013 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd34 (Post 9496156)
SF boards are saying he will likely line up at NT most of the time but shift to DT with Justin Smith in nickel situations. The NT goes out of the game for another DB when they go nickel. Aldon Smith and McDonald are DEs in the nickel. Ian Williams is a backup. They will still draft another DL if the right guy comes up. They have a lot of talent but thin at DL. When Justin went down last season their pass rush went down with him.

Considering Justin plays the 3 in subs, they'll be play Dorsey as a shaded 1 for the majority of his snaps in both base fronts and subs.

Chiefshrink 03-13-2013 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 9496141)
Yes. It's true. Denver gets Welker. We get...

If we can trade down a few spots then watch us draft Tavon Austin and then watch the 'donkeys' go ohhhhhhhhhhh sh************ !!! Understand, b4 the Welker signing today all the fan base, media, etc...... out here have been clamoring for the donks to trade up a few spots and get Austin.

I'm mean hell, if we aren't going to draft Geno, his buddy Austin IS the real deal playmaker and is a mini-Percy Harvin in the slot that is actually football tough. I say draft his ass ! BPA !!!:thumb:

jd34 03-13-2013 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ponderception (Post 9496167)
Considering Justin plays the 3 in subs, they'll be play Dorsey as a shaded 1 for the majority of his snaps in both base fronts and subs.

That will be true much of the time, however, they move Justin all the way in to the nose on occasion if they feel that is a better matchup. They move the DL sets around a lot. They like versatile players that can do that. They don't just sit in one set and dare you to beat them.

Hammock Parties 03-13-2013 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9495373)
I'd rather have Dorsey than DeVito and I'd much rather have Dorsey at his figure over DeVito at his.

We really screwed the pooch on the DE position thus far.

I'd rather have them BOTH, because they're both about equal players.

**** Tyson Jackson. Should have just been cut outright.

If Dorsey rapes in SF and Tyson Jackson continues to be a borderline scrap heap NFL reject, **** Dorsey for this DE crap.

And yes I realize bitching about DEs in a 3-4 is pretty, but after the QB bullshit, everything is getting scrutinized.

lcarus 03-13-2013 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefshrink (Post 9496169)
If we can trade down a few spots then watch us draft Tavon Austin and then watch the 'donkeys' go ohhhhhhhhhhh sh************ !!! Understand, b4 the Welker signing today all the fan base, media, etc...... out here have been clamoring for the donks to trade up a few spots and get Austin.

I'm mean hell, if we aren't going to draft Geno, his buddy Austin IS the real deal playmaker and is a mini-Percy Harvin in the slot that is actually football tough. I say draft his ass ! BPA !!!:thumb:

I love Austin. He's gonna be a hell of a playmaker.

Hammock Parties 03-13-2013 11:18 PM

Actually the more I think about this, the more I want to puke.

Unless there's something I'm ignorant of that prevents Dorsey or DeVito from flipping to LDE, we let Dorsey walk for Tyson Jackson.

That sucks.

edit: nevermind. DeVito IS a left end. But is he play RE here? What the **** is going on?

Sorter 03-13-2013 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd34 (Post 9496192)
That will be true much of the time, however, they move Justin all the way in to the nose on occasion if they feel that is a better matchup. They move the DL sets around a lot. They like versatile players that can do that. They don't just sit in one set and dare you to beat them.

Justin's snaps playing a 1 tech are very limited, despite the fact they do move him around occasionally.

49ers do switch it up in regards to having multiple nickel and dime packages with different fronts/alignments/personnel.

Bump 03-13-2013 11:45 PM

well bye

J Diddy 03-14-2013 12:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9496193)
I'd rather have them BOTH, because they're both about equal players.

**** Tyson Jackson. Should have just been cut outright.

If Dorsey rapes in SF and Tyson Jackson continues to be a borderline scrap heap NFL reject, **** Dorsey for this DE crap.

And yes I realize bitching about DEs in a 3-4 is pretty, but after the QB bullshit, everything is getting scrutinized.

Dorsey was shit here.

Getting mad over him leaving is like being upset over getting rid of a fungus on your toe.

BossChief 03-17-2013 10:44 PM

Suck it, haters.

The best 3-4 defense in football has been peeking at my posts, evidently.

49ers plan to play Glenn Dorsey as a Jay Ratliff type nose

49ers plan to play Glenn Dorsey at nose
Mar 15 - 2:31 PM


At 6-foot-1 and just over 300 pounds, Dorsey will be an undersized nose tackle in the Jay Ratliff mold. The 49ers will likely give him plenty of penetrating opportunities as opposed to using Dorsey as a two-gap plugger. Dorsey's two-year deal is worth $6 million. He received a $2.285 million signing bonus. Mar 15 - 2:31 PM

Mother****erJones 03-17-2013 10:45 PM

Ya shouldve tried him at NT.

BossChief 03-17-2013 10:49 PM

I'm gonna be pissed if Dorsey goes on to blow up entire star systems for the 49ers in the exact role he should have played here.

Just watch Danny Devito prove to be overpaid while Dorsey turns into one of the best values of free agency this year.

DaneMcCloud 03-17-2013 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9510144)
I'm gonna be pissed if Dorsey goes on to blow up entire star systems for the 49ers in the exact role he should have played here.

Just watch Danny Devito prove to be overpaid while Dorsey turns into one of the best values of free agency this year.

Wow, I'm glad to see you're not negative this offseason.

HolyHat 03-17-2013 10:54 PM

DeVito is Dorsey. Nothing to worry about.

BossChief 03-17-2013 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9510151)
Wow, I'm glad to see you're not negative this offseason.

I'm just refusing to put on those Chiefs blinders over moves that nobody wanted until AFTER they happened.

Hopefully, I'm wrong, but right now,

I'd rather have Dorsey than Devito
Geno than Alex
A drafted corner over Danta Robinsons broke ass
Matt Moore over Alex Smith

All I want is to be able to enjoy Chiefs games again so I can get my son interested in the team and some of these moves just seem like another replay of the Cassel years.

Hopefully, I'm wrong.

DaneMcCloud 03-17-2013 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9510191)
I'm just refusing to put on those Chiefs blinders over moves that nobody wanted until AFTER they happened.

Hopefully, I'm wrong, but right now,

I'd rather have Dorsey than Devito
Geno than Alex
A drafted corner over Danta Robinsons broke ass
Matt Moore over Alex Smith

All I want is to be able to enjoy Chiefs games again so I can get my son interested in the team and some of these moves just seem like another replay of the Cassel years.

Hopefully, I'm wrong.

Do you which Top Five pick the Chiefs missed after he left?

Neil Smith.

You're insane if you think Glenn Dorsey = Neil Smith.

And Matt Moore?

LMAO

mcaj22 03-17-2013 11:17 PM

i will say Boss Chief may actually be right

Dorsey clearly went to visit a winning franchise and that team sold him on the idea of trying some NT, and he gladly accepted it.

Something this inept franchise never tried to do in 5 years with him. That's not his fault. And when he has a good season at NT and Mike Devito ends up being a scrub that cant rush the passer, we will see who is laughing

the moment went went to a 34 they should have tried Dorsey at the NT

DaneMcCloud 03-17-2013 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 9510202)
i will say Boss Chief may actually be right

Dorsey clearly went to visit a winning franchise and that team sold him on the idea of trying some NT, and he gladly accepted it.

Something this inept franchise never tried to do in 5 years with him. That's not his fault. And when he has a good season at NT and Mike Devito ends up being a scrub that cant rush the passer, we will see who is laughing

the moment went went to a 34 they should have tried Dorsey at the NT

Dorsey is such a monster that he went from $10 per year on his rookie contract, to $2 million per.

Ewww, I'm scared.

BossChief 03-17-2013 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9510199)
Do you which Top Five pick the Chiefs missed after he left?

Neil Smith.

You're insane if you think Glenn Dorsey = Neil Smith.

And Matt Moore?

LMAO

Let me ask you a serious question...

No moving the goalposts.

RIGHT NOW would YOU trade Alex Smith for Matt Moore, a second rounder, a third rounder AND 8 million in cap space that could be used to add a guy like Dumervil?

No half stepping.

Would you trade him RIGHT NOW?

BossChief 03-17-2013 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9510208)
Dorsey is such a monster that he went from $10 per year on his rookie contract, to $2 million per.

Ewww, I'm scared.

A team setting up what very well could be a run of superbowls thinks Dorsey could man one of the most important positions in their defense.

Teams aren't paying players this year...with his injury history, giving Dorsey 3/yr on pure potential in a new system is considerable.

DaneMcCloud 03-17-2013 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9510216)
Let me ask you a serious question...

No moving the goalposts.

RIGHT NOW would YOU trade Alex Smith for Matt Moore, a second rounder, a third rounder AND 8 million in cap space that could be used to add a guy like Dumervil?

No half stepping.

Would you trade him RIGHT NOW?

There no ****ing way I'd trade for Matt Moore.

**** that.

DaneMcCloud 03-17-2013 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9510222)
A team setting up what very well could be a run of superbowls thinks Dorsey could man one of the most important positions in their defense.

Teams aren't paying players this year...with his injury history, giving Dorsey 3/yr on pure potential in a new system is considerable.

You're smoking crack.

Dorsey had FIVE ****ING YEARS to prove something and all he proved was that he was an EPIC FAILURE, especially at #5 overall.

Take off the homer glasses. Jesus.

BossChief 03-17-2013 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9510223)
There no ****ing way I'd trade for Matt Moore.

**** that.

Close your mouth when you're breathing.

We lose:

Alex Smith

We gain:

Matt Moore
34th pick in the draft
3rd rounder next year
8 million in cap space.

ANYONE that wouldn't take that trade (for KC) is a God damned fool.

DaneMcCloud 03-17-2013 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9510227)
Close your mouth when you're breathing.

We lose:

Alex Smith

We gain:

Matt Moore
34th pick in the draft
3rd rounder next year
8 million in cap space.

ANYONE that wouldn't take that trade (for KC) is a God damned fool.

No thanks.

RunKC 03-17-2013 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9510222)
A team setting up what very well could be a run of superbowls thinks Dorsey could man one of the most important positions in their defense.

Teams aren't paying players this year...with his injury history, giving Dorsey 3/yr on pure potential in a new system is considerable.

Dorsey ****ing blows. He's small and won't get any pass rush at all. He got his ass handed to him multiple times last year.

DeVito is easily better than him at this point.LMAO

Simply Red 03-17-2013 11:42 PM

Bye Glenn - take care bud.

BigRock 03-17-2013 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9510216)
RIGHT NOW would YOU trade Alex Smith for Matt Moore, a second rounder, a third rounder AND 8 million in cap space that could be used to add a guy like Dumervil?

How many dimensions do you have to travel through until you get to an alternate universe where Dumervil, or anyone else worth a shit, would sign with a team QB'd by Matt Moore?

I'd guess at least 8.

BossChief 03-17-2013 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9510233)
Dorsey ****ing blows. He's small and won't get any pass rush at all. He got his ass handed to him multiple times last year.

DeVito is easily better than him at this point.LMAO

SF disagrees.

BossChief 03-17-2013 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRock (Post 9510250)
How many dimensions do you have to travel through until you get to an alternate universe where Dumervil, or anyone else worth a shit, would sign with a team QB'd by Matt Moore?

I'd guess at least 8.

Matt Moore is the backup in that alternate universe and Geno is the top pick.

BigRock 03-18-2013 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9510254)
Matt Moore is the backup in that alternate universe and Geno is the top pick.

OK. But if I'm Elvis Dumervil and I could stay with Denver or go to Baltimore, is that supposed to excite me?

mcaj22 03-18-2013 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9510208)
Dorsey is such a monster that he went from $10 per year on his rookie contract, to $2 million per.

Ewww, I'm scared.


so you're saying we overpaid severely for a 1 down, 1 dimensional useless trick pony in Mike DeVito,

if so I agree fully.

BossChief 03-18-2013 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRock (Post 9510277)
OK. But if I'm Elvis Dumervil and I could stay with Denver or go to Baltimore, is that supposed to excite me?

That's irrelevant.

Dumervil was just the example of what quality of player we could get for the 8 million difference between Alex Smith and Matt Moore.

BigRock 03-18-2013 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9510287)
That's irrelevant.

Dumervil was just the example of what quality of player we could get for the 8 million difference between Alex Smith and Matt Moore.

And as I've been saying, a player of that quality isn't coming here in your scenario. Because they have options beyond the 2-win team whose best QB is a total unknown.

BossChief 03-18-2013 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRock (Post 9510322)
And as I've been saying, a player of that quality isn't coming here in your scenario. Because they have options beyond the 2-win team whose best QB is a total unknown.

Then split it up and sign 2 more 4 million per year players.

You guys keep arguing over the semantics and ignoring to important part which is the savings and how it can be redistributed.

mcaj22 03-18-2013 12:37 PM

i agree that the unknown is how many players balked at the Chiefs offers to them, so KC can only get the guys that want to come here based on their offer + location + FO.

I think they missed on more FA targets than you think, compared to what they hit on.

Guys like Fasano seem awfully like "rush to Plan B" than "Plan A" target FAs. Mike DeVito was also a plan B if the reports that the offer to Glenn Dorsey fell through ___ hours before FA started.


They definitely missed on Phillip Wheeler and Chris Canty, to name some that leaked.

mcaj22 03-18-2013 12:39 PM

i guess "miss" is a strong word

i should say, their target FA wish list probably looked A LOT different than what they actually hit on. But they are still happy with what they got and that's all that matters, but I bet you the first wave of guys they sent feelers out to was not the ones signed that is for sure. Probably just Sean Smith/Dunta in that regard.

DaneMcCloud 03-18-2013 12:46 PM

This crap about Matt Moore is just that: Crap. The guy wasn't in contention as a starter for any NFL franchise which is why he signed to back up Tannehill at $4 million per.

philfree 03-18-2013 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9511017)
This crap about Matt Moore is just that: Crap. The guy wasn't in contention as a starter for any NFL franchise which is why he signed to back up Tannehill at $4 million per.

It's the new ABA. Anyone but Alex!

BigRock 03-18-2013 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9511001)
Then split it up and sign 2 more 4 million per year players.

You guys keep arguing over the semantics and ignoring to important part which is the savings and how it can be redistributed.

The idea that the money could go towards an impact player just seemed to be a selling point of your proposal. Maybe I read it wrong. I'm just saying, it's not going to an impact guy. It'd just go to another Devito and Fasano. If you replace "sign a guy like Dumervil" with "sign another Mike Devito", it loses some luster.

That's all I meant.

Ace Gunner 03-18-2013 01:08 PM

Glenn Dorsey = $51 million dollar man

now

Glenn Dorsey = $6 million dollar man


yet some folks think he is somehow going to be better. hilarious.

BossChief 03-18-2013 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9511017)
This crap about Matt Moore is just that: Crap. The guy wasn't in contention as a starter for any NFL franchise which is why he signed to back up Tannehill at $4 million per.

He signed for 4 million per and my scenario has him as a stop gap starter with Geno being the top pick.

Try to follow along.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRock (Post 9511028)
The idea that the money could go towards an impact player just seemed to be a selling point of your proposal. Maybe I read it wrong. I'm just saying, it's not going to an impact guy. It'd just go to another Devito and Fasano. If you replace "sign a guy like Dumervil" with "sign another Mike Devito", it loses some luster.

That's all I meant.

I was just trying to illustrate what level of talent that kind of money gets in free agency.

No worries.

DaneMcCloud 03-18-2013 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9511093)
He signed for 4 million per and my scenario has him as a stop gap starter with Geno being the top pick.

Which is exactly what I said.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9511093)
Try to follow along.

Yeah, you just shut the **** up, Asshole.

The Chiefs are not choosing Geno Smith, so why don't YOU stop bitching about it as if he's a ex-girlfriend that broke your heart.

Rausch 03-18-2013 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9511093)
He signed for 4 million per and my scenario has him as a stop gap starter with Geno being the top pick.

Try to follow along.

I would have loved that. Cheap stop-gap and draft for the future.

And honestly I think would be a better option than Smith...

GloryDayz 03-18-2013 01:30 PM

Good bye who?

Deberg_1990 03-18-2013 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9511094)
The Chiefs are not choosing Geno Smith, so why don't YOU stop bitching about it as if he's a ex-girlfriend that broke your heart.


Agreed. I wasnt crazy about A. Smith either, but ive accepted it and moved on. Ive got to trust that these guys know what they are doing. This appears to be the Chiefs best coach and staff in quite some time. Ive got to trust that Reid can work some magic with Smith. Whatever the case, its pointless to bitch about it now. We should at least wait until the season starts to see how these guys perform.

Rausch 03-18-2013 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9511104)
This appears to be the Chiefs best coach and staff in quite some time. Ive got to trust that Reid can work some magic with Smith. Whatever the case, its pointless to bitch about it now. We should at least wait until the season starts to see how these guys perform.

True. And this year it may work out.

The frustrating this is that we say "well, I'm worried about the situation but let's wait and see" every year...

GloryDayz 03-18-2013 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9511114)
True. And this year it may work out.

The frustrating this is that we say "well, I'm worried about the situation but let's wait and see" every year...

I wonder if that's what the Pats think every year at this time? **** me!!!!!!!!!

Rausch 03-18-2013 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gloryrape (Post 9511137)
I wonder if that's what the Pats think every year at this time? **** me!!!!!!!!!

What a stupid comparison...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.