ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs we have 2"franchise" LTs (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=272581)

milkman 04-28-2013 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9640906)
so why have any of these players on the roster?

I mean unless they are going to be super bowl caliber after Alex Smith is gone in 2 years, just cut them all and go 0-16.

better yet, just forfeit the entire season and wait until we draft again next year because we are dooooooooooooooooooomed.


Can someone loan AC a tampon because apparently he is out.

I think what he's suggesting, and that I agree with, is that you put the line out there that you think has the chance to develop and grow together, and have them playing at their peak when the Chiefs do get the QB that can lead them to a SB.

The only problem with that thought process is that the Chiefs will never get that QB.

AustinChief 04-28-2013 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9640902)
I think you're worried too much. While it's his rookie year and not later into his career, this is to me a lot like when Tait switched to the right side in '02. He wasn't really a right tackle, and he went straight back to the left side for the Bears the following year, but at that time it's what made the most sense for the team. That was also, coincidentally, probably the best line I've ever seen. I think this is a similiar situation, though obviously different in several ways (e.g. no Roaf).

And I think Fisher would be more than 'fine' at RT. I think he could be dominant there, far and away better than anyone else we have. That's part of my logic. I think Albert on the left side and him on the right is significantly better overall than Fisher on the left side, albert inside and anybody else we have on the right.

Tait moving around after years in the league is far different from a rookie's first exposure to the speed of the NFL coming from the "wrong" side. It can (not saying it will, but CAN) seriously screw up his development. Just ask Tyron Smith. Fisher does have the advantage of being smarter than most so it may not be an issue but why risk it when signing Albert long term at LG or trading him away will allow us money to sign a true RT like Clabo.

AustinChief 04-28-2013 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9640906)
so why have any of these players on the roster?

I mean unless they are going to be super bowl ready after Alex Smith is gone in 2 years, just cut them all and go 0-16.

better yet, just forfeit the entire season and wait until we draft again next year because we are dooooooooooooooooooomed.


Can someone loan AC a tampon because apparently he is out.

This is an incredibly stupid post.. even in general CP terms... just incredibly stupid. You're better than this. Try again.

keg in kc 04-28-2013 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9640927)
Tait moving around after years in the league is far different from a rookie's first exposure to the speed of the NFL coming from the "wrong" side. It can (not saying it will, but CAN) seriously screw up his development. Just ask Tyron Smith. Fisher does have the advantage of being smarter than most so it may not be an issue but why risk it when signing Albert long term at LG or trading him away will allow us money to sign a true RT like Clabo.

I hope they can trade Albert. I'm just talking in terms of the current realities of the roster...

I just don't think Fisher would struggle with it if we're stuck with them both.

Hammock Parties 04-28-2013 01:34 PM

We need to keep Albert at LT, dumbasses.

No way I want a rookie protecting Alex Smith's blindside.

We need to go with the established veteran who has allowed less pressure than Duane Brown the last two seasons. You can't pay enough for that kind of quality protection.

Mr. Laz 04-28-2013 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9640922)
I think what he's suggesting, and that I agree with, is that you put the line out there that you think has the chance to develop and grow together, and have them playing at their peak when the Chiefs do get the QB that can lead them to a SB.

The only problem with that thought process is that the Chiefs will never get that QB.

I understand and we are with the exception of Brandon Albert.

It's a unique and temporary situation

People are still pissed about taking an OT and 1.1 and it's making them adamant about Fisher being at LT 'no matter what the cost,dammit'. Putting Fisher at RT for even a single snap makes them even more angry about the pick.

get over it

AustinChief 04-28-2013 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9640922)
I think what he's suggesting, and that I agree with, is that you put the line out there that you think has the chance to develop and grow together, and have them playing at their peak when the Chiefs do get the QB that can lead them to a SB.

The only problem with that thought process is that the Chiefs will never get that QB.

100% agree except I'm holding out hope on the QB thing..

If you can sign Albert long term at LG you will have plenty of space to sign a guy like Clabo at RT and all of a sudden you have a killer line that you don;t need to worry about for years. OR you can play Fisher at RT and risk screwing him up like Tyron Smith and you get the fun of reshuffling the line in a year. Just makes zero ****ing sense unless you are in some sort of desperate win now mode.

Mr. Laz 04-28-2013 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9640935)
This is an incredibly stupid post.. even in general CP terms... just incredibly stupid. You're better than this. Try again.

one stupid post in response to another stupid post

Your petulant and idiotic declaration that this year basically doesn't matter because Alex Smith sucks is beyond 'dumbass'.

Kidd Lex 04-28-2013 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9640922)
I think what he's suggesting, and that I agree with, is that you put the line out there that you think has the chance to develop and grow together, and have them playing at their peak when the Chiefs do get the QB that can lead them to a SB.

The only problem with that thought process is that the Chiefs will never get that QB.

The people running the team believe we have have that QB. Scary thought.

AustinChief 04-28-2013 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9640943)
We need to keep Albert at LT, dumbasses.

No way I want a rookie protecting Alex Smith's blindside.

We need to go with the established veteran who has allowed less pressure than Duane Brown the last two seasons. You can't pay enough for that kind of quality protection.

A rookie? yes, like this is some 4th round nobody... IT'S THE #1 PLAYER IN THE DRAFT. You start him at LT and unless he busts horribly you keep him there.

I hope to God our team isn't as ****ing stupid as the Cowboys...

keg in kc 04-28-2013 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9640949)
Just makes zero ****ing sense unless you are in some sort of desperate win now mode.

The offseason moves tell me that's exactly what they're doing.

milkman 04-28-2013 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9640944)
I understand and we are with the exception of Brandon Albert.

It's a unique and temporary situation

People are still pissed about taking an OT and 1.1 and it's making them adamant about Fisher being at LT 'no matter what the cost,dammit'. Putting Fisher at RT for even a single snap makes them even more angry about the pick.

get over it

Your post, however, was directed at a guy (AC) that has always argued that Albert is just an average LT, so I highly doubt that he is reacting to it, and forwarding a plan out of any anger because we took a LT at 1.1.

As for me, I don't like the Fisher pick, but the deed is done, and now my only consideration is to do what I consider will maximize the value of the pick long term.

Hammock Parties 04-28-2013 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9640957)
A rookie? yes, like this is some 4th round nobody... IT'S THE #1 PLAYER IN THE DRAFT. You start him at LT and unless he busts horribly you keep him there.

I hope to God our team isn't as ****ing stupid as the Cowboys...

So because one player struggled to make the switch, all players will do so.

Great logic.

Nate Solder switched from RT to LT and did just fine.

This is just an extension of your vendetta against Branden Albert.

Remember: he allowed less pressure than Duane Brown the last two seasons.

That must really stick in your craw.

AustinChief 04-28-2013 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9640953)
one stupid post in response to another stupid post

Your petulant and idiotic declaration that this year basically doesn't matter because Alex Smith sucks is beyond 'dumbass'.

No you need to put down your drink and read my posts again. You are channeling some serious stupid right now.

I am not saying Alex Smith sucks or this year doesn't matter. I am saying that taking a myopic "win now" attitude is reeruned as opposed to doing what is best for the team for many years to come. I am saying that if you were one of the people who bitched about Alex Smith and wanted to draft a QB of our own... then you would be a hypocrite to not treat the Oline in a similar fashion.

Following along now?

Mr. Laz 04-28-2013 01:42 PM

of course Reid and Dorsey are trying to win now.

They believe Alex Smith can win in the NFL or they wouldn't of given 2 valuable draft picks for him.

Even if Alex Smith isn't a franchise type QB, they think he is a playoff type QB and Albert at LT and Fisher at RT is the best chance to succeed and get to the playoffs this year.

milkman 04-28-2013 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9640943)
We need to keep Albert at LT, dumbasses.

No way I want a rookie protecting Alex Smith's blindside.

We need to go with the established veteran who has allowed less pressure than Duane Brown the last two seasons. You can't pay enough for that kind of quality protection.

Don't care.

If we are going to build a dominant line, and we want to maximize it's potential as quickly as we can, you start the rookie LT day one at LT.

Who the hell cares if mediocre game manager gets killed in the development process?

AustinChief 04-28-2013 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9640975)
Your post, however, was directed at a guy (AC) that has always argued that Albert is just an average LT, so I highly doubt that he is reacting to it, and forwarding a plan out of any anger because we took a LT at 1.1.

As for me, I don't like the Fisher pick, but the deed is done, and now my only consideration is to do what I consider will maximize the value of the pick long term.

Just to be clear I have said he is just an ABOVE average guy.. 10-15 range which I adjusted to 8-12 range after last year.

I am pissed that this draft class sucked but I am fine with the pick. There simply wasn't anyone else to pick there.. no matter how much I wish that wasn't true doesn't change the facts.

All of that said, I firmly believe Fisher can be a beast at LT for us for years to come

AustinChief 04-28-2013 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9640985)
of course Reid and Dorsey are trying to win now.

They believe Alex Smith can win in the NFL or they wouldn't of given 2 valuable draft picks for him.

Even if Alex Smith isn't a franchise type QB, they think he is a playoff type QB and Albert at LT and Fisher at RT is the best chance to succeed and get to the playoffs this year.

I'm sure they believe they can win now but I doubt they will do so to the detriment of the future of this team. Playing your LTOTF out of position for a year is not a good idea for the future.

Now I could be wrong and Fisher could be even better than I think he is and simply GODLIKE in his ability to adjust and such... if so it still hurts the cohesion of the line to reshuffle next year but it won't be terrible.

Fact is, we would be MUCH better served to get a real RT like Clabo and not have to play anyone out of position. Period.

Mr. Laz 04-28-2013 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9640983)
No you need to put down your drink and read my posts again. You are channeling some serious stupid right now.

I am not saying Alex Smith sucks or this year doesn't matter. I am saying that taking a myopic "win now" attitude is reeruned as opposed to doing what is best for the team for many years to come. I am saying that if you were one of the people who bitched about Alex Smith and wanted to draft a QB of our own... then you would be a hypocrite to not treat the Oline in a similar fashion.

Following along now?

basically you are

creating drama by moving Albert
putting a rookie at left tackle

both things weaken the Oline, team and give Alex Smith less of a chance to get off to a good start and succeeding this year. All because you think playing right tackle for a single season might hinder Fisher's development.

nah, if you want to win this year then you put Fisher and RT for a year and then make your moves next year. Fisher will have plenty of time next offseason and training camp to 'switch hands'

now if you want to argue that Albert isn't very good(like MM suggests) then that's an entirely different discussion.

AustinChief 04-28-2013 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9640990)
Don't care.

If we are going to build a dominant line, and we want to maximize it's potential as quickly as we can, you start the rookie LT day one at LT.

Who the hell cares if mediocre game manager gets killed in the development process?

Exactly. I'm much more concerned about a LT that I know will be here for many years over a QB who could flame out in one.

Mr. Laz 04-28-2013 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9641006)
Fact is, we would be MUCH better served to get a real RT like Clabo and not have to play anyone out of position. Period.

They probably would have if a team thought Albert was worth big money and a draft pick.

apparently they don't, so we have to move on


just like the people who didn't like trading for Alex Smith have to 'move on'

Mr. Laz 04-28-2013 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9640990)
Don't care.

If we are going to build a dominant line, and we want to maximize it's potential as quickly as we can, you start the rookie LT day one at LT.

Who the hell cares if mediocre game manager gets killed in the development process?

once again ... the anger about Alex Smith is influencing other things.

the goal is not building a dominant line ... it's a means to a end.

best Oline for offensive success THIS year is Albert at LT.

AustinChief 04-28-2013 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9641019)
basically you are

creating drama by moving Albert
putting a rookie at left tackle

both things weaken the Oline, team and give Alex Smith less of a chance to get off to a good start and succeeding this year. All because you think playing right tackle for a single season might hinder Fisher's development.

nah, if you want to win this year then you put Fisher and RT for a year and then make your moves next year. Fisher will have plenty of time next offseason and training camp to 'switch hands'

now if you want to argue that Albert isn't very good(like MM suggests) then that's an entirely different discussion.

Albert is very good. Exactly... very good... not great. Solidly above average. I doubt that Fisher will present much of a dropoff if any in his rookie season playing LT.

As for DRAMA? What is this a ****ing knitting circle? Who the **** cares about DRAMA???

And it's not just my opinion on switching sides at the NFL level... Schwartz and Schlereth have both said it is a complete bitch to do. I have no clue if it will screw Fisher up but it certainly carries that risk. No matter what it sets him back a year in his development at LT and it sets the line's cohesion back a year... for WHAT GAIN? To protect Alex Smith? One thing Alex Smith HAS proven in his career is that he can handle adversity. He's the least of my worries.

AustinChief 04-28-2013 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9641034)
They probably would have if a team thought Albert was worth big money and a draft pick.

apparently they don't, so we have to move on


just like the people who didn't like trading for Alex Smith have to 'move on'

Except we aren't "stuck" with Albert. We can STILL trade him or better yet convince him to play LG. Signing him long term at LG solves everything.

Hammock Parties 04-28-2013 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9641050)
I doubt that Fisher will present much of a dropoff if any in his rookie season playing LT.

Fisher is not going to allow total pressure of 17 this year.

He'd be a rookie of the year candidate if he did that.

I'm guessing he gives up at least 17 pressures and probably 3-4 sacks.

And that's being optimistic.

Expectations are way too high.

mlyonsd 04-28-2013 02:02 PM

Make them battle it out in TC and unless Fisher is noticeably inferior as a rook start him at LT. Albert gets sloppy seconds at this point.

AustinChief 04-28-2013 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9641045)
once again ... the anger about Alex Smith is influencing other things.

the goal is not building a dominant line ... it's a means to a end.

best Oline for offensive success THIS year is Albert at LT.

Except I am not ANGRY about Fisher. I like the kid a TON.

I am also not ANGRY about Albert. I simply don't overvalue him. GoChiefs has two gears... LOVE or HATE.. he can't comprehend someone like me just LIKING Albert.

Lastly, I'm not angry about Alex Smith. I think it sucks that he was our only decent option this year but it is what it is. I would love a QBOTF to get drafted... but that doesn't make me dislike Smith at all. I liked him at San Fran and thought he constantly got a raw deal.

I have zero anger.. I just want to look at what is best for our FUTURE as team. Playing guys constantly out of position and shuffling shit year to year is not what's best.

Cannibal 04-28-2013 02:04 PM

Wish Albert would acquiesce and make the move to LG or RT.

We'd have the makings of a great OL.

Hammock Parties 04-28-2013 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannibal (Post 9641093)
Wish Albert would acquiesce and make the move to LG or RT.

We'd have the makings of a great OL.

We do.

Just stick Fisher at RT and Albert at LT for five years and forget about it.

None of this guard BS.

We need top talent at RT to stop Von Miller anyway.

AustinChief 04-28-2013 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannibal (Post 9641093)
Wish Albert would acquiesce and make the move to LG or RT.

We'd have the makings of a great OL.

NOT RT! I have massive doubts about his ability to play there at a high level. I COMPLETELY understand why he doesn't want to make that move. It's not just the loss of prestige and money. Switching sides is a complete bitch.

I'd much rather get a true RT and get Albert as LG.

BigRedChief 04-28-2013 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannibal (Post 9641093)
Wish Albert would acquiesce and make the move to LG or RT.

We'd have the makings of a great OL.

Not going to happen. Albert will play LT and Fisher to RT. Next off season we will do this all over again. Albert will be tagged. Will attempt to trade him. But next season Fisher will move to LT and we will make that known to Albert to to take the best deal or else its RT pal.

AustinChief 04-28-2013 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9641101)
We do.

Just stick Fisher at RT and Albert at LT for five years and forget about it.

None of this guard BS.

We need top talent at RT to stop Von Miller anyway.

Holy crap. You seriously want to play the #1.1 pick at RT and pay 5 years of top 5 money to an above average guy to play LT. The same guy that no one else in the league wanted to pay and give up a 2nd rounder for.

Credibility gone.

AustinChief 04-28-2013 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 9641109)
Not going to happen. Albert will play LT and Fisher to RT. Next off season we will do this all over again. Albert will be tagged. Will attempt to trade him. But next season Fisher will move to LT and we will make that known to Albert to to take the best deal or else its RT pal.

I am not saying that WON'T happen.. but it sure hell SHOULDN'T. You simply don;t risk ****ing up the #1.1's development by starting him out of position. Hell, play Fisher at LG if you have to but don't start him at RT for his first experience of the speed of the NFL.

Hammock Parties 04-28-2013 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9641115)
Holy crap. You seriously want to play the #1.1 pick at RT

Well, we made this bed, so now we have to lay in it.

I'd rather go OT-RT than upgrade LG with the 1.1. Even dumber, no doubt.

milkman 04-28-2013 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9641045)
once again ... the anger about Alex Smith is influencing other things.

the goal is not building a dominant line ... it's a means to a end.

best Oline for offensive success THIS year is Albert at LT.

This isn't anger at the Smith trade.

I am not speculating what the Chiefs will do.

I am commenting on what I believe is the best way to go about building a consistent winner over the long term.

Since I have little faith that Alex Smith is the long term answer at QB, I don't care how the long term development of the line affects Alex Smith.

AustinChief 04-28-2013 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9641121)
Well, we made this bed, so now we have to lay in it.

I'd rather go OT-RT than upgrade LG with the 1.1. Even dumber, no doubt.

So it sounds more like you are basing this on some emotional hatred of the Fisher pick and man-love for Albert. I, on the other hand, am trying to look at what is best for the team.

Saccopoo 04-28-2013 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9640658)
Albert starts at LT
Fisher starts at RT

If Albert gets hurt again then Fisher slides over to LT and Stephenson fills in at RT.

Albert loses his leverage and his big contract ... probably ends up at guard with another team next year.

Who says Fisher is going to beat out Stephenson? Who says Albert is going to beat out Stephenson?

I'm telling you right here that Stephenson was going to be in the conversation as the first tackle off the board in the 2013 Draft if he stayed in school. He was markedly better than Lane Johnson on the same team and he's already got better feet than Albert.

His combine numbers, especially his burst numbers, were absolutely sick.

6'6"
35" Arms
312 lbs.

40: 4.94 seconds
Vertical: 35.5"
Broad Jump: 114"
3 Cone: 7.52 seconds
20 Yard Shuttle: 4.78 seconds

compared to Eric Fisher:

6'7"
34 1/2" Arms
308 lbs.

40: 5.05 seconds
Vertical: 28.5"
Broad Jump: 116"
3 Cone: 7.59 seconds
20 yard shuttle: 4.44 seconds

Stephenson is an athletic freak for a man his size, even moreso than Fisher, and he's got very, very good footwork.

Considering that Stephenson was thrown into a game situation with zero reps with the first team, I think he performed quite well last season. He showed good movement and a very good first punch. He's got a very good kick step as well. (Something Branden Albert has never had.)

I know that the immediate knee-jerk reaction around here is that if a guy wasn't drafted in the first round it means he isn't going to amount to shit, but Stephenson would have definitely been a first rounder this draft if he stayed in school and could have gone before Fisher or Joeckel.

I've already said it, but Stephenson is going to blow up this year.

seamonster 04-28-2013 02:14 PM

I could care less where they put him this year if it means we can develop a truly nasty "**** you" offensive line, especially in Reid's system. I'm not above moving the number one overall pick around if opens up the screen game. He'll be the left tackle for the next ten years anyways.

milkman 04-28-2013 02:15 PM

And let's be clear here.

There is no one that has advocated as strongly as I have for Albert at LT.

If I am suggesting that the long term future of this team is served best by moving him to LG, then there can be no better proof that I've moved on from anger to just doing what I believe best serves the team's future.

Hammock Parties 04-28-2013 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9641132)
So it sounds more like you are basing this on some emotional hatred of the Fisher pick and man-love for Albert. I, on the other hand, am trying to look at what is best for the team.

I hate the Fisher pick, but the reality is he is here.

We need to use that resource to improve the team.

The best way to do that is to have bookend tackles.

**** this guard bullshit.

BigRedChief 04-28-2013 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9641120)
I am not saying that WON'T happen.. but it sure hell SHOULDN'T. You simply don;t risk ****ing up the #1.1's development by starting him out of position. Hell, play Fisher at LG if you have to but don't start him at RT for his first experience of the speed of the NFL.

thats not what I want to happen, just reading the tea leaves. I say **** Albert and start Fisher at LT.

GordonGekko 04-28-2013 02:20 PM

We have two premiere pieces of the offensive line now. I want Albert at LT for this season, and Fisher at RT. Only fair to big Albert. With Fisher at RT it will give him a chance to get some confidence as he didn't exactly square off against the prime competition while in college.

milkman 04-28-2013 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9641147)
I hate the Fisher pick, but the reality is he is here.

We need to use that resource to improve the team.

The best way to do that is to have bookend tackles.

**** this guard bullshit.

The problem is that moving from left to right is far more difficult than any of us can really understand, and Albert hasn't learned fully the proper technique to play LT even still.

The best shift for him, and the Chiefs, would be from LT to LG.

Saccopoo 04-28-2013 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9641057)
Except we aren't "stuck" with Albert. We can STILL trade him or better yet convince him to play LG. Signing him long term at LG solves everything.

This feels a lot like dejavu...

I only wish we had this conversation when we had the opportunity to draft a true elite level prospect at the OT position...

http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2010/1027...okung1_200.jpg

Imagine how "jelled" this line would have been with Okung at LT and Albert at LG for the past three seasons.

Cannibal 04-28-2013 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9641101)
We do.

Just stick Fisher at RT and Albert at LT for five years and forget about it.

None of this guard BS.

We need top talent at RT to stop Von Miller anyway.

I'd be fine with that if Albert agrees to sign and his back holds up.

BossChief 04-28-2013 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9641147)
I hate the Fisher pick, but the reality is he is here.

We need to use that resource to improve the team.

The best way to do that is to have bookend tackles.

**** this guard bullshit.

In terms of NFL contracts, left guards are far more important than right tackles. Couple that with the fact that coming out of college, Albert seemed like he could be an all pro guard or a high ceiling project at left tackle and it seems if he is gonna move to the next most important spot on the line, he will go to LG.

Hammock Parties 04-28-2013 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9641389)
In terms of NFL contracts, left guards are far more important than right tackles.

By all means, put inferior talent at RT.

http://dy.snimg.com/story-image/0/85...78-650-366.jpg

Saccopoo 04-28-2013 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9641399)
By all means, put inferior talent at RT.

http://dy.snimg.com/story-image/0/85...78-650-366.jpg

Reminds me of the Seahawks/Chiefs game where Derrick Thomas set the NFL record for sacks in a game with seven and the Chiefs still lost.

BossChief 04-28-2013 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9641186)
The problem is that moving from left to right is far more difficult than any of us can really understand, and Albert hasn't learned fully the proper technique to play LT even still.

The best shift for him, and the Chiefs, would be from LT to LG.

Why are some of these guys not understanding this?

Hammock Parties 04-28-2013 03:16 PM

Chiefs have already played their hand anyway.

Schwartz was practicing at LG.

Fisher will be a RT.

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-28-2013 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut (Post 9640100)
Cool, looks like you really know your place. Super noble.

LMAO
Posted via Mobile Device

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-28-2013 03:18 PM

Fisher will play where HE is damned well told to.
Posted via Mobile Device

BossChief 04-28-2013 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice (Post 9641399)
By all means, put inferior talent at RT.

http://dy.snimg.com/story-image/0/85...78-650-366.jpg

Haha

So in YOUR opinion, we should put a rookie LEFT tackle (who comes from a smaller school and hasn't faced big time talent before) into a completely new position (that has completely sufferer technique) because in YOUR opinion that makes us better than putting a near GOD MODE offensive line out there by signing a vet like Clabo and lining up like this:

Fisher
Albert
Hudson
Asamoah
Clabo

Haha

This isn't a video game, asking a rookie left tackle to play on the right side is a great way to hurt his transition.

Let the rookie play the position he was drafted to play and put Albert at his next most useful spot...the one he played in college and projected as a pro bowl quality player.

Rausch 04-28-2013 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9641115)
Holy crap. You seriously want to play the #1.1 pick at RT and pay 5 years of top 5 money to an above average guy to play LT. The same guy that no one else in the league wanted to pay and give up a 2nd rounder for.

Credibility gone.

After this year the only way Albert plays here is if it's at G or RT. The rookie will get a year at RT and then Albert can switch positions or switch teams...

AustinChief 04-28-2013 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9641447)
After this year the only way Albert plays here is if it's at G or RT. The rookie will get a year at RT and then Albert can switch positions or switch teams...

Not according to GoCHiefs.. he wants Albert long term at LT.

The only way I see Fisher being a long term RT for us if if the impossible happens and Stephenson EXPLODES this year and is our clear best LT. Then you move Albert to LG (or trade) and Fisher goes RT. Reid gets his Tra Thomas and Jon Runyan. Not a likely scenario.

Saccopoo 04-28-2013 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9641572)
Not according to GoCHiefs.. he wants Albert long term at LT.

The only way I see Fisher being a long term RT for us if if the impossible happens and Stephenson EXPLODES this year and is our clear best LT. Then you move Albert to LG (or trade) and Fisher goes RT. Reid gets his Tra Thomas and Jon Runyan. Not a likely scenario.

That's not the impossible at all.

As I stated earlier, Stephenson, had he stayed in school, was going to be in the mix as the first tackle taken in the 2013 draft. He was better than Lane Johnson on the same team. He's already got better feet than Albert.

Add to it that Fisher is coming out of a small school, he's going to have an adjustment period that might be substantially greater than a lot of D1 tackles. (And even top level guys take a couple of years to "get it," e.g., Albert.)

Stephenson is going to blow up. It is a very likely scenario:

LT: Fisher
LG: Albert
C: Hudson
RG: Schwartz
RT: Stephenson

They'll put Fisher at LT, and Albert will have to play LG to help protect the rookie against DE/OLB stunts and bull rushes by DTs.

Most likely why they picked up Braden Wilson and his blocking ability.

SAUTO 04-28-2013 04:42 PM

That's the line I want Sacc.
Posted via Mobile Device

Rausch 04-28-2013 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9641572)
Not according to GoCHiefs.. he wants Albert long term at LT.

So?...

Rausch 04-28-2013 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 9641611)
That's not the impossible at all.

As I stated earlier, Stephenson, had he stayed in school, was going to be in the mix as the first tackle taken in the 2013 draft. He was better than Lane Johnson on the same team. He's already got better feet than Albert.

Add to it that Fisher is coming out of a small school, he's going to have an adjustment period that might be substantially greater than a lot of D1 tackles. (And even top level guys take a couple of years to "get it," e.g., Albert.)

Stephenson is going to blow up. It is a very likely scenario:

LT: Fisher
LG: Albert
C: Hudson
RG: Schwartz
RT: Stephenson

They'll put Fisher at LT, and Albert will have to play LG to help protect the rookie against DE/OLB stunts and bull rushes by DTs.

Most likely why they picked up Braden Wilson and his blocking ability.

You don't think that's happening this year, do you?

Saccopoo 04-28-2013 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9641632)
You don't think that's happening this year, do you?

Yep.

Hammock Parties 04-28-2013 05:47 PM

Ya'll might as well accept it, though.

Schwartz is the LG.

Rausch 04-28-2013 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 9641702)
Yep.

I seriously doubt that...

mcaj22 04-28-2013 05:54 PM

im really glad Jeff Allen, a 2nd round pick investment will be rotting on the bench it seems

bang up job wasting high round draft picks on nothing

SAUTO 04-28-2013 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 9641737)
im really glad Jeff Allen, a 2nd round pick investment will be rotting on the bench it seems

bang up job wasting high round draft picks on nothing

Dude you keep on with this...

The guy who did it got FIRED.
Posted via Mobile Device

Mecca 04-28-2013 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 9641737)
im really glad Jeff Allen, a 2nd round pick investment will be rotting on the bench it seems

bang up job wasting high round draft picks on nothing

This is what happens when regimes change, they don't give 2 shits about how anyone was acquired.

Titty Meat 04-28-2013 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 9641737)
im really glad Jeff Allen, a 2nd round pick investment will be rotting on the bench it seems

bang up job wasting high round draft picks on nothing

Jeff Allen sucks

Mecca 04-28-2013 07:27 PM

By the way if Albert is on this team for the season there's no ****ing way he's not playing LT. The most likely scenario you get for this year is..

LT Albert
LG Schwartz
C Hudson
RG Asamoah
RT Fisher

That pretty much has to be the line I'd think.

RealSNR 04-28-2013 08:01 PM

Didn't Asamoah play LG in college and had to switch because we weren't going to move Ryan Lilja?

Why not switch Asamoah back to LG and keep Schwartz on the right side where he's been his entire career?

MOhillbilly 04-28-2013 08:12 PM

Gun to the head.

Mecca 04-28-2013 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9642274)
Didn't Asamoah play LG in college and had to switch because we weren't going to move Ryan Lilja?

Why not switch Asamoah back to LG and keep Schwartz on the right side where he's been his entire career?

They could do that, I really so no way in hell that Albert isn't the LT though.

O.city 04-28-2013 08:14 PM

I'd say Mecca's line there is probably what we are looking at, unless they can kick Albert in to LG (doubtful they do, but who knows, IIRC, Bad Guy said something about it).

I'm actually really excited about the talent we have up front. It's all young too.

Mecca 04-28-2013 08:17 PM

The only way Albert is playing guard is if he gets a long term deal first and he's basically the highest paid guard in the history of the NFL, so a guard with LT money.

O.city 04-28-2013 08:18 PM

What did Levitre get this year? I can't remember.

Mecca 04-28-2013 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9642372)
What did Levitre get this year? I can't remember.

Not as much as Carl Nicks did last year.

RunKC 04-28-2013 08:22 PM

Albert was very adamant about staying at LT, so I wonder if he's gonna still have that attitude?

He's gonna have no choice but to play where Reid tells him. If he decides he's holding out, then he's gonna lose some serious cash.

O.city 04-28-2013 08:22 PM

I'd hate to give him that type money for a guard, when he hasn't played it in so long.


Maybe play him there, with the thought that if all goes well he'd get that type money?

O.city 04-28-2013 08:23 PM

However, if you weren't willing to play him at LT this year with that price tag, you trade him for what you can get, ala, the 54 pick instead of the 42.

I just dont' see a way he doesn't play LT this year.

Mecca 04-28-2013 08:24 PM

I personally wouldn't at all be surprised if Albert got a new deal. They could have easily worked the fan base into accepting a OT first when that was the plan all along.

O.city 04-28-2013 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 9642403)
I personally wouldn't at all be surprised if Albert got a new deal. They could have easily worked the fan base into accepting a OT first when that was the plan all along.

Do you keep him at LT though?

milkman 04-28-2013 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 9642403)
I personally wouldn't at all be surprised if Albert got a new deal. They could have easily worked the fan base into accepting a OT first when that was the plan all along.

What?

The casual fan was all in, and has been all in, on LT in the draft for 4 years.

They weren't selling jack to the fan.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.