ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Browns Trade Trent Richardson to Colts (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=276415)

O.city 09-18-2013 05:29 PM

If Indy needed a rb so bad, why not save the pick and go get mcgahee?

Rams Fan 09-18-2013 05:30 PM

Richardson is a long term answer, McGahee is a short term one.

salame 09-18-2013 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9991407)
If Indy needed a rb so bad, why not save the pick and go get mcgahee?

Do you think Mcgahee will performthe 3-7 years that t-rich would

Rams Fan 09-18-2013 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9991261)

This move smells like Irsay, not Grigson.

He did the same shit last year before the Vontae Davis trade.

AustinChief 09-18-2013 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9991403)
So who else is picking up Willis McGahee in fantasy football?

If your league uses the waiver wire to acquire free agents, go get him. Now.

I'm curios to see if they slide Ogbonnaya over from FB. He has been effective at times.

Mr. Laz 09-18-2013 05:32 PM

Brian McIntyre ‏@brian_mcintyre 41m
Browns may have to carry $6.67M in "dead" space after trading Richardson, but are $25M under the cap. Can roll that over to 2014.

O.city 09-18-2013 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by salame (Post 9991419)
Do you think Mcgahee will performthe 3-7 years that t-rich would

3-7 years for a rb with injury problems?

O.city 09-18-2013 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 9991416)
Richardson is a long term answer, McGahee is a short term one.

A long term answer at rb? For a first round pick?

Rams Fan 09-18-2013 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 9991425)
I'm curios to see if they slide Ogbonnaya over from FB. He has been effective at times.

Ogbonnaya is nothing more than a 3rd down RB. He can't carry the load.

BossChief 09-18-2013 05:35 PM

My buddy is a little pissed at me. About a week ago, I sent him a text asking what they got for Trent Richardson and played it off like they traded him.

Now, he thinks I either knew something all along and didn't tell the whole truth or that I jinxed them.

Bwahahaha

Now he doesn't want to go to the Browns game.

Gravedigger 09-18-2013 05:37 PM

If I were a Browns fan I'd be pissed. Not only did you give away a formidable running back with plenty of tread on the tires, but you basically said to season ticket holders, "Thanks for the money, we're not going to compete this season. Stop on by next year though!"

O.city 09-18-2013 05:41 PM

That formidable running back brought you back a first rounder.

Deberg_1990 09-18-2013 05:42 PM

Unreal he went 3rd overall. I don't think id take a RB before 20 in todays NFL.
Posted via Mobile Device

the Talking Can 09-18-2013 05:42 PM

ballsy move by cleveland....it works if richardson is just a good, not great back and they draft a QB....if you don't believe in something, better to change it then waste time (cassel, pioli, clark)

indy gets richardson's production right now, in advance of the pick...they have their franchise QB, so you can see the logic...but if Ballard going down was the reason you did this, then you should have planned better in the offseason

FringeNC 09-18-2013 05:45 PM

How is Trent Richardson at pass-blocking?

rolltide2014 09-18-2013 06:28 PM

This guy is a freak, I've seen him in the gym before and its ungodly the things he's capable of. He put other guys here like Fluker and Barrett Jones to shame.

notorious 09-18-2013 06:32 PM

Yes.


Indy is ****ing themselves over. This is great news.

ClevelandBronco 09-18-2013 06:35 PM

I approve.

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-18-2013 06:36 PM

What a god-awful, stupid trade by the Colts. Richardson ran behind Alex Mack and Joe Thomas last year and he still ****ing sucked. The only RB definitely worth a first rounder is Peterson, and given how lucky the Colts were last year, that pick might end up being in the 12-15 range.

Mav 09-18-2013 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gravedigger (Post 9991448)
If I were a Browns fan I'd be pissed. Not only did you give away a formidable running back with plenty of tread on the tires, but you basically said to season ticket holders, "Thanks for the money, we're not going to compete this season. Stop on by next year though!"

Oh, well, no one is happy, and now that its coming out that this trade was actually orchestrated in the PRESEASON, and held onto because the owner wanted to get as many season tickets as possible.


Yeah. :cuss:

NJChiefsFan 09-18-2013 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9991476)
That formidable running back brought you back a first rounder.

What is the Browns GM situation? I feel a little silly not knowing, but is the current one the guy who took Richardson in the first place? I mean yeah you got a first rounder back, but if you prefer that over a RB why waste a 3rd overall only to trade him for a 20ish overall? I mean that was only last year. Did they really not like what they saw?

kysirsoze 09-18-2013 06:40 PM

http://www.strangesports.com/images/content/105193.jpg

Mav 09-18-2013 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan (Post 9991642)
What is the Browns GM situation? I feel a little silly not knowing, but is the current one the guy who took Richardson in the first place? I mean yeah you got a first rounder back, but if you prefer that over a RB why waste a 3rd overall only to trade him for a 20ish overall? I mean that was only last year. Did they really not like what they saw?

No. That was Tom Heckert. The GM right now by title is Michael Lombardi. There lots of confusion. It is said that its a thing that every move has to be approved by Banner, and that Ray Farmer, and Michael Lombardi are tag teaming the roster.

So, really? Who the hell knows.

And about what they saw. The rumor is that Lombardi has wanted to blow the entire thing up.

notorious 09-18-2013 06:41 PM

I would almost think long and hard about trading Jamaal for a 1st.

kysirsoze 09-18-2013 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 9991489)
How is Trent Richardson at pass-blocking?

My Colts fan friend, who is jacked up about this trade, says he's one of the better ones in the league.

I actually like this trade for the Browns. Good for them, saying enough is enough with the QB carousel. (I will retract this post if they end up not getting their QBOTF.)

kysirsoze 09-18-2013 06:43 PM

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BUdKOgcCcAEtay5.jpg:large

Mother****erJones 09-18-2013 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 9991228)
Cleveland is not mailing it in 2 games into the damn season! lol! Obviously TR didn't fit into their plans and the Colts needed a RB.

Oh no? Lol ya they are. They traded their best offensive player for a pick in next years draft.

KCBOSS1 09-18-2013 07:30 PM

I have never seen a team begin positioning for the first pick like this. Yes, they want Johnny Football, guaranteed. Still no guarantee they will get him. They're going to have a tough time being worse than Jacksonville; and Jacksonville will take Him unless Cleveland is already bartering with both #1s.

Mav 09-18-2013 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCBOSS1 (Post 9991778)
I have never seen a team begin positioning for the first pick like this. Yes, they want Johnny Football, guaranteed. Still no guarantee they will get him. They're going to have a tough time being worse than Jacksonville; and Jacksonville will take Him unless Cleveland is already bartering with both #1s.

makes perfect sense for the Browns. Blow the season and then draft a gimmick qb......

FML.

vailpass 09-18-2013 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCBOSS1 (Post 9991778)
I have never seen a team begin positioning for the first pick like this. Yes, they want Johnny Football, guaranteed. Still no guarantee they will get him. They're going to have a tough time being worse than Jacksonville; and Jacksonville will take Him unless Cleveland is already bartering with both #1s.

Between the two it will be an epic battle of qb suck this year.

Iowanian 09-18-2013 07:34 PM

That seems like a dumb move unless the Browns know something the colts don't.

how would you really know what Richardson is capable of doing, when he's only spent 1 year on an offense with no passing threat...

KCBOSS1 09-18-2013 07:36 PM

I've just never seen a team begin posturing this early and obviously. Huge risk, but they need to really shake things up in Cleveland. I worked there for 8.5 months in 2008-2009. Lebron was there (watched Him live... impressive). But those are some starving Brown fans. I really felt for them.

ChiefsCountry 09-18-2013 07:37 PM

Speaking of this trade, what the hell where the Rams thinking - this would have been perfect for them. Richardson would thrive under Fisher, Bradford would look good and they got the extra first rounder from the Redskins trade.

KCBOSS1 09-18-2013 07:41 PM

They need a Manziel type of player.... with real star status to bring some real hope back to that program. I would imagine if they don't have the first overall pick at the end of the season, they will mortgage the farm, asking Jacksonville what they want. This is too freaky for this not to be their primary motive. They saw Jacksonville tanking early and knew that they would have to start moving. I wouldn't be surprised to see them try to get another #1 simply for more trade power.

the Talking Can 09-18-2013 07:44 PM

i support tanking


take all the pain at once

ChiefsCountry 09-18-2013 07:44 PM

Manziel to the Browns would be awesome for the turd that is Johnny Football.

RealSNR 09-18-2013 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 9991803)
Speaking of this trade, what the hell where the Rams thinking - this would have been perfect for them. Richardson would thrive under Fisher, Bradford would look good and they got the extra first rounder from the Redskins trade.

Damn. This is a pretty good point.

bevischief 09-18-2013 07:55 PM

Wow.

vailpass 09-18-2013 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 9991819)
Manziel to the Browns would be awesome for the turd that is Johnny Football.

He'd probably refuse.

saphojunkie 09-18-2013 08:13 PM

Browns draft Johnny Manziel, he arrives in the center of town and gets run over by Lebron's entourage as he returns to tell the Cavs to **** off.

And all is right wight the world.

Rams Fan 09-18-2013 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 9991803)
Speaking of this trade, what the hell where the Rams thinking - this would have been perfect for them. Richardson would thrive under Fisher, Bradford would look good and they got the extra first rounder from the Redskins trade.

The Rams currently have 3 RBs that were drafted within the past 2 seasons as well as a rookie UDFA on the roster. While it might have been interesting to see the Rams acquire Trent Richardson, it would mean that Pead-a 2nd round pick- would be a bust, Darryl Richardson would have had a shot for only 2 games, and Stacy/Cunningham would have never been given a look.

Rams Fan 09-18-2013 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 9991818)
i support tanking


take all the pain at once

The Browns have been horrendous for the better part 15 seasons, though.

Sweet Daddy Hate 09-18-2013 08:24 PM

Another Texas Turd headed to Cleveland.

Have fun, Johnny!

Gravedigger 09-18-2013 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCBOSS1 (Post 9991810)
They need a Manziel type of player.... with real star status to bring some real hope back to that program. I would imagine if they don't have the first overall pick at the end of the season, they will mortgage the farm, asking Jacksonville what they want. This is too freaky for this not to be their primary motive. They saw Jacksonville tanking early and knew that they would have to start moving. I wouldn't be surprised to see them try to get another #1 simply for more trade power.

That's what they're doing with this trade is getting trade bait for the best quarterback to come out this next year. Bet the college QB's start saying.... Shit, I don't want to go to the Browns....

Brock 09-18-2013 08:30 PM

Lombardi used to write blowjob articles for Pioli, now maybe Scott can return the favor.

MeatRock 09-18-2013 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace (Post 9991639)
Oh, well, no one is happy, and now that its coming out that this trade was actually orchestrated in the PRESEASON, and held onto because the owner wanted to get as many season tickets as possible.


Yeah. :cuss:

WTF? That's an awesome trade for the Browns. Are you kidding me? A 1st round pick for Trent Richardson. I would take that pick and run.

RealSNR 09-18-2013 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 9991963)
The Browns have been horrendous for the better part 15 seasons, though.

Is middling around with 6-10/7-9 instead of 1-15/2-14 really going to fix that problem, though?

Like, I just don't see how it's worth it.

Red Dawg 09-18-2013 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rolltide2014 (Post 9991612)
This guy is a freak, I've seen him in the gym before and its ungodly the things he's capable of. He put other guys here like Fluker and Barrett Jones to shame.

The gym? Who cares. The field is what matters. They need a QB.

Sweet Daddy Hate 09-18-2013 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9992009)
Is middling around with 6-10/7-9 instead of 1-15/2-14 really going to fix that problem, though?

Like, I just don't see how it's worth it.

Those ur' 'spectable showings, mang. 'Spectable!

Rams Fan 09-18-2013 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9992009)
Is middling around with 6-10/7-9 instead of 1-15/2-14 really going to fix that problem, though?

Like, I just don't see how it's worth it.

Excluding 1999, they've had a 1st overall pick and 3 #3 picks(4 including Richardson via a trade up).

I'm not saying it might not be worth it, but it's the Cleveland ****ing Browns. They are never, ever, ever lucky with anything.

vailpass 09-18-2013 08:53 PM

If you're in full rebuild mode you can't have too many first round picks.

Basileus777 09-18-2013 09:13 PM

It's a smart trade for Cleveland. Richardson hasn't been very impressive and the Browns are in a better position to evaluate him than anyone. And looking at Indy's schedule, this could be a decent pick. The pick they spent last year is a sunk cost, you can't factor that in when making a decision now, just whether or not Richardson is worth a mid first round pick.

SeeingRed 09-18-2013 09:20 PM

Crazy trade...sorry to all you poor bastards who have Ahmad Bradshaw in fantasy :-/

Mr Luzcious 09-18-2013 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SeeingRed (Post 9992189)
Crazy trade...sorry to all you poor bastards who have Ahmad Bradshaw in fantasy :-/

I also have Steven Jackson.
:banghead:

Sweet Daddy Hate 09-18-2013 09:36 PM

I've got **** ****erson in fantasy this year. His stats make Alex and Kaep fans weep with sorrow.

Mr Luzcious 09-18-2013 09:39 PM

...who?

ThaVirus 09-18-2013 10:08 PM

Holy hell. This came wayyyy out of left field for me.

whoman69 09-18-2013 10:24 PM

this is why the Browns are always so horrible. Stupid trade. They keep trading off their best players.

Sweet Daddy Hate 09-18-2013 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whoman69 (Post 9992356)
this is why the Browns are always so horrible. Stupid trade. They keep trading off their best players.

Browns fans need to PM Scott Pioli and learn more about "process-trusting".

Gravedigger 09-18-2013 10:39 PM

Trent Richardson heard about it over the radio too. Lol, God Cleveland you are such a bullshit organization.

Mav 09-19-2013 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MeatRock (Post 9992006)
WTF? That's an awesome trade for the Browns. Are you kidding me? A 1st round pick for Trent Richardson. I would take that pick and run.

Sure. Yeah. Absolutely, because the browns have proven to be SO SMART with trading and drafting.

let me refresh if I may.

Traded UP to get Brady Quinn.

Traded DOWN, while not picking JULIO JONES, so they could draft Phil Taylor, then used the picks received from said trade, to draft Greg Little, (bust), and Brandon Weeden, (bust).

I have NO faith that the browns will get the right qb. Rumors are they are already scouting JOHNNY FOOTBALL.

Mav 09-19-2013 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whoman69 (Post 9992356)
this is why the Browns are always so horrible. Stupid trade. They keep trading off their best players.

Couldn't agree more.

ChiefsCountry 09-19-2013 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace (Post 9992578)
Sure. Yeah. Absolutely, because the browns have proven to be SO SMART with trading and drafting.

let me refresh if I may.

Traded UP to get Brady Quinn.

Traded DOWN, while not picking JULIO JONES, so they could draft Phil Taylor, then used the picks received from said trade, to draft Greg Little, (bust), and Brandon Weeden, (bust).

I have NO faith that the browns will get the right qb. Rumors are they are already scouting JOHNNY FOOTBALL.

We got Justin Houston on the Phil Taylor deal.
Posted via Mobile Device

Mav 09-19-2013 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 9992581)
We got Justin Houston on the Phil Taylor deal.
Posted via Mobile Device

Sighs........

Gravedigger 09-19-2013 01:33 AM

He must've ****ed Joe Banner's granddaughter or something.

Consistent1 09-19-2013 01:58 AM

I don't even think they should be allowed to do that. Not normally one for trying to control stuff, but that was just bullshit. Just hand Indy the wildcard for a ****ing pick.

kcxiv 09-19-2013 02:17 AM

The new guys knew without a qb they aren't going anywhere. They started over again. It's not a bad thing for them. U need to get that qb right. Chances are they probably won't but they are trying. Chiefs just got fuvked by a poor draft class. We are almost as cursed as the Browns. Lol

the Talking Can 09-19-2013 04:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 9991963)
The Browns have been horrendous for the better part 15 seasons, though.

i had no idea

the Talking Can 09-19-2013 04:39 AM

the idea that the new staff shouldn't try because people before them failed is..um...how to say this politely...

WhiteWhale 09-19-2013 06:21 AM

Trent Richardson is the next Adrian Peterson /cp draftniks

WhiteWhale 09-19-2013 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9991226)
On a Sid note, the browns just practically punted the season.

People keep saying this, and to be blunt... it's stupid.

Cleveland had no chance. What did they 'punt' exactly? Does anyone think they were finishing better than last WITH Richardson?

Skyy God 09-19-2013 06:54 AM

Jim Brown was right after all.

MahiMike 09-19-2013 07:23 AM

Browns fighting Jaguars over 1st pick now.

MahiMike 09-19-2013 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCBOSS1 (Post 9991778)
I have never seen a team begin positioning for the first pick like this. Yes, they want Johnny Football, guaranteed. Still no guarantee they will get him. They're going to have a tough time being worse than Jacksonville; and Jacksonville will take Him unless Cleveland is already bartering with both #1s.

Nah, they want Bridgewater.

BlackHelicopters 09-19-2013 07:25 AM

Read this whole thread. Trying to make sense of this trade. Very confused.

MahiMike 09-19-2013 07:27 AM

I'm just stoked that my 1st round fantasy pick is going to a team with a real offense!

Radar Chief 09-19-2013 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Luzcious (Post 9992229)
I also have Steven Jackson.
:banghead:

I’m in the exact same boat.
I think, more like hope, Bradshaw is still good for a week or two though. Richardson won’t start right away, it’ll take at least a week for him to learn enough of the playbook to start taking snaps from Bradshaw.

ReynardMuldrake 09-19-2013 07:50 AM

Dunno if this has been mentioned yet, but apparently Trent learned he was traded when he heard it on the radio:

Quote:

Mark Schwab
‏@MarkSchwab
Trent also said a friend called, said "You've been traded?" he told him to shut up & hung up. Turned on radio and learned he'd been dealt.
https://twitter.com/MarkSchwab/statu...29633634312192

tecumseh 09-19-2013 07:53 AM

The Browns definitely got the upside of this trade. Considering the Colts many needs on the O line, this is too much for too little. Hell, they could have traded the pick down and got more value. Richardson for a 2nd, yes, a 1st? nope.

whoman69 09-19-2013 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 9992687)
People keep saying this, and to be blunt... it's stupid.

Cleveland had no chance. What did they 'punt' exactly? Does anyone think they were finishing better than last WITH Richardson?

You're not going to get a chance if you keep trading your best player. They're back to square one, version 4.0


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.