ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Those that have said Cutler is better than Alex Smith. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=289232)

Chief Roundup 12-17-2014 06:43 PM

Chicago's OL breaks down as 12th in run blocking and 18th in pass blocking.
Chiefs OL breaks down as 9th in run blocking and 25th in pass blocking.

Now who has better protection when throwing the ball?

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 11199173)
Chicago's OL breaks down as 12th in run blocking and 18th in pass blocking.

PFF? Bullshit.

Chief Roundup 12-17-2014 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11199154)
It's a poor comparison.

Jeff George was 30 games under .500.

Sometimes you just make it so obvious that you never have truly watched the game of football.

Chief Roundup 12-17-2014 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11199176)
PFF? Bullshit.

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ol

https://www.profootballfocus.com/blo...-rankings-2/4/

Both sites have them similarly ranked.

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 11199179)
Sometimes you just make it so obvious that you never have truly watched the game of football.

Sorry but Jay Cutler is not nearly as big of a bonehead as Jeff George was.

Similar attitudes and arms but that's it.

ThaVirus 12-17-2014 06:50 PM

It really is fantastic to see GoChiefs be wrong about damn near everything.

It's borderline impressive, really.

Marcellus 12-17-2014 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 11199189)

Clay loved PFF until they started disagreeing with his vitriol.

He simply cherry picks what he thinks supports the crayon and finger paint images in his head.

Chief Roundup 12-17-2014 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11199192)
Sorry but Jay Cutler is not nearly as big of a bonehead as Jeff George was.

Similar attitudes and arms but that's it.

I don't know you have to be pretty ****ing stupid to have diabetes and be getting drunk all the damn time.

Chief Roundup 12-17-2014 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11199195)
Clay loved PFF until they started disagreeing with his vitriol.

He simply cherry picks what he thinks supports the crayon and finger paint images in his head.

Yeah that has always been his schtick. I have always tried to find more than one report before I put much belief in their formulas.

Easy 6 12-17-2014 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 11199133)
The fervor with which they defend the guy is just hilarious to me.

What the two give you is not much different in the grand scheme of things. They'll give you a 9-7 team and a first round playoff exit more often than not.

Cutler has given the Bears 5-9, with according to your measurements... the best receiver/tight end/back combo in the league... and I would be hard pressed to find another better equipped offense.

Was the line all pro? yeah probably not... but it WAS improved according to every single player and spokesman in that building.

Bottom line... you know that Cutler underperforms and so does everyone else, with that particular team I bet Smitty has already locked up the NFCN. Defense you say? Smitty would protect that shit defense and help maximize them.

Would both provide the same ultimate record? thats an honest question... I say no, the QB that moves the chains best is the QB that protects his crap defense the best... its symbiotic, man.

With Smith, the Bears and their weapons... they're 10-4... he wont **** a team that good over, and he also wont underperform with them, either.

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 11199193)
It really is fantastic to see GoChiefs be wrong about damn near everything.

It's borderline impressive, really.

Was right about Alex.

Cutler isn't all that but he's better than a guy who is afraid to throw the ball down the field and only ever wins because of defense.

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 11199205)
With Smith, the Bears and their weapons... they're 10-4... he wont **** a team that good over, and he also wont underperform with them, either.

32nd ranked defense = 4-12 with Alex.

He only wins when the D shows up.

Marcellus 12-17-2014 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11199206)
Was right about Alex.

Cutler isn't all that but he's better than a guy who is afraid to throw the ball down the field and only ever wins because of defense.


Not true you said he couldn't throw more than 23 times a game and win or keep his turnover margin where it was.

You were wrong.

Easy 6 12-17-2014 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11199192)
Sorry but Jay Cutler is not nearly as big of a bonehead as Jeff George was.

Similar attitudes and arms but that's it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 11199193)
It really is fantastic to see GoChiefs be wrong about damn near everything.

It's borderline impressive, really.

This is reeeally as far as the argument should go.

Victory, TV.

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11199219)
Not true you said he couldn't throw more than 23 times a game and win or keep his turnover margin where it was.

You were wrong.

I never said that.

Easy 6 12-17-2014 07:11 PM

Cutler SUCKS... Smith sucks.

If only someone could anonymously poll the Chiefs, or anyone elses, lockerroom... Cutler vs Smith LMAO

It would be such a huge blowout, the kind of gaseous blowout on Uranus that only a gas giant like cosmo is capable of besting.

Clay, you still havent said if you'd trade Cutler for Smith straight up right now, go ahead man, you've got nothing to lose...

ThaVirus 12-17-2014 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 11199205)
Cutler has given the Bears 5-9, with according to your measurements... the best receiver/tight end/back combo in the league... and I would be hard pressed to find another better equipped offense.



Was the line all pro? yeah probably not... but it WAS improved according to every single player and spokesman in that building.



Bottom line... you know that Cutler underperforms and so does everyone else, with that particular team I bet Smitty has already locked up the NFCN. Defense you say? Smitty would protect that shit defense and help maximize them.



Would both provide the same ultimate record? thats an honest question... I say no, the QB that moves the chains best is the QB that protects his crap defense the best... its symbiotic, man.



With Smith, the Bears and their weapons... they're 10-4... he wont **** a team that good over, and he also wont underperform with them, either.


They both underperform oftentimes. They just do it in different ways.

This isn't really something I care to argue about but I'd have to disagree about Alex having already wrapped up that division. Their strength is in their offensive skill positions, which we know Alex wouldn't maximize. Marshall and Jeffery would become 600-900 yard 4-8 TD guys and their defense would still struggle.

Do you honestly think Alex could beat Rodgers in a shootout twice a year?

Marcellus 12-17-2014 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11199232)
I never said that.


Yea you did, you were looking at his attempts per game in SF and his low TO ratio. I think you even made some claim against Smith's win % over a certain number of pass attempts. You then looked at Reid's historical offensive pass attempts per game and started making all kinds of claims. It was the off season after we traded for him. There were several heated discussions about it.

I remember it even if you don't. Then again you post so much BS I am sure it would be hard for you to remember it all.

RobBlake 12-17-2014 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mav (Post 11198966)
**** both of them. But if you don't think that Cutler's league leading turnovers aren't hurting his defense, then you are reeruned.

You jump on wagons more than some invadin' indians

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11199259)
Yea you did, you were looking at his attempts per game in SF and his low TO ratio. I think you even made some claim against Smith's win % over a certain number of pass attempts. You then looked at Reid's historical offensive pass attempts per game and started making all kinds of claims. It was the off season after we traded for him. There were several heated discussions about it.

Not me, someone else.

All I ever said was he would not throw the ball down the field and we would not be productive on offense.

Those things came true.

Mav 12-17-2014 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RobBlake (Post 11199261)
You jump on wagons more than some invadin' indians

Defend alex at the end of the cards game. I dare you.

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 11199253)
Clay, you still havent said if you'd trade Cutler for Smith straight up right now, go ahead man, you've got nothing to lose...

There's no point in Alex Smith quarterbacking an NFL team so I'll take my chances with a guy who actually tries to make plays.

Marcellus 12-17-2014 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11199264)
Not me, someone else.

All I ever said was he would not throw the ball down the field and we would not be productive on offense.

Those things came true.

BS liar is all you are.

Fact is you have created threads singing his praises, like you did Cassel.

You simply just go with the flow at the time. You are weak.

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11199272)
Fact is you have created threads singing his praises, like you did Cassel.

Absolutely not.

Brock 12-17-2014 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RobBlake (Post 11199261)
You jump on wagons more than some invadin' indians

While you remain attached to alex's taint like a possum sucking a persimmon.

Marcellus 12-17-2014 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11199278)
Absolutely not.

Jesus Clay I had a quote from the OP as my sig for a long time.

Weakling. Weak little guy who used to be fat.

jspchief 12-17-2014 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 11199198)
I don't know you have to be pretty ****ing stupid to have diabetes and be getting drunk all the damn time.

People with diabetes can't drink?

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11199281)
Jesus Clay I had a quote from the OP as my sig for a long time.

Weakling. Weak little guy who used to be fat.

You are talking out your ass. I never started any threads about defending Alex while he was our QB.

By the way, personal insults are not appreciated.

Marcellus 12-17-2014 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 11199282)
People with diabetes can't drink?

Drink or get drunk all the time? Reading comprehension issue or lack of knowledge?

Marcellus 12-17-2014 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11199285)
You are talking out your ass. I never started any threads about defending Alex while he was our QB.

By the way, personal insults are not appreciated.

I never said he was our QB at the time did I?

Personal insults? You called me a dumb homer. Weak little used to be fat kid.

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11199290)
I never said he was our QB at the time did I?

What I said about Alex in 2006 is irrelevant to this conversation.

By the way, you are a dumb homer. That's not an insult. That is who you are.

Marcellus 12-17-2014 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11199294)
What I said about Alex in 2006 is irrelevant to this conversation.

By the way, you are a dumb homer. That's not an insult. That is who you are.

So what I said was correct and........ you are a weak used to be fat kid. Facts are facts.

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11199296)
So what I said was correct and........ you are a weak used to be fat kid. Facts are facts.

The only weak ones are the dumb homers...too scared to realize what is right in front of them. A flawed team, a flawed QB, a pointless franchise.

Marcellus 12-17-2014 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11199301)
The only weak ones are the dumb homers...too scared to realize what is right in front of them. A flawed team, a flawed QB, a pointless franchise.

If they are pointless and you know it, go away idiot or else you are way dumber than the "homer idiots" who don't think so.

That's not even difficult to understand. Showing your ass again.

Later, been fun trolling the troll.

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11199315)
If they are pointless and you know it, go away idiot or else you are way dumber than the "homer idiots" who don't think so.

That's not even difficult to understand. Showing your ass again.

I enjoy clubbing you and your fellow baby seals. Why would I leave?

Chief Roundup 12-17-2014 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 11199282)
People with diabetes can't drink?

Not without knowing full well that they are damaging themselves.
This was all discusses ad nauseum when he was in Denver. He has the kind that makes it harder, almost impossible, to regulate your sugar levels especially when you are drunk. What happens when he passes out from being drunk and doesn't check his sugar? It is very easy for him to end up in a coma or worse.

Chief Roundup 12-17-2014 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11199317)
I enjoy clubbing you and your fellow baby seals. Why would I leave?

:LOL: :LOL: Everyone knows that you are here for attention, anyway you can get it. You would rather have negative attention than none at all.

Sandy Vagina 12-17-2014 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 11199140)
Chicago's line is ****ing horrible. One of the worst in the league.

This is a great example of how "excuses" get made here for other QBs, but never for your own in which you dislike from the start.

PFF
Chicago OL is ranked 13th best on pass pro efficiency right now... KC ranks 25th.

Outsiders
Chicago OL is ranked 18th best on pass pro efficiency right now... KC ranks 25th.



:doh!:

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 11199324)
:LOL: :LOL: Everyone knows that you are here for attention, anyway you can get it. You would rather have negative attention than none at all.

I enjoy debating the non-merits of my favorite football franchise, sir. Good day to you, and enjoy the checkdowns if that is your thing.

RobBlake 12-17-2014 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mav (Post 11199267)
Defend alex at the end of the cards game. I dare you.

he failed and he failed vs the niners too. Seems like they actually gameplanned to push it last week and it made for more enjoyable watching. The steelers defense can be passed on and I expect a much more aggressive gameplan this sunday too.

RobBlake 12-17-2014 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 11199329)
This is a great example of how "excuses" get made here for other QBs, but never for your own in which you dislike from the start.

PFF
Chicago OL is ranked 13th best on pass pro efficiency right now... KC ranks 25th.

Outsiders
Chicago OL is ranked 18th best on pass pro efficiency right now... KC ranks 25th.



:doh!:

money post

jspchief 12-17-2014 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 11199287)
Drink or get drunk all the time? Reading comprehension issue or lack of knowledge?

Just a genuine question. I have a buddy that has to take insulin shots daily, and he loves his beer. He doesn't strike me as the self destructive type.

I dont pretend to know the extent of Cutler's drinking (and I doubt anyone else here does either) so I just dont know where all this fits in the discussion. Cutler is clearly a dumbass and has attitude issues regardless.

Chief Roundup 12-17-2014 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 11199339)
Just a genuine question. I have a buddy that has to take insulin shots daily, and he loves his beer. He doesn't strike me as the self destructive type.

I dont pretend to know the extent of Cutler's drinking (and I doubt anyone else here does either) so I just dont know where all this fits in the discussion. Cutler is clearly a dumbass and has attitude issues regardless.

I just thought about editing that post a little. I was going to stipulate that there is a difference between having a few drinks and getting drunk. Cutler cannot drink just a few.

Ragged Robin 12-17-2014 07:42 PM

cutler is a piece of shit and has made a career out of garbage time TDs

Did you guys watch the thanksgiving game? Down 2+ scores, 1 minute left, he was soooooooo pumped about trying to get a garbage time TD, no huddle, completely emphatic, milked that last 60 seconds for like 5 real time minutes... and then ended up throwing a pick at the very end anyway. He's a complete bonehead.

Easy 6 12-17-2014 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 11199255)
Do you honestly think Alex could beat Rodgers in a shootout twice a year?

Of course not, but neither can Cutler... but if I only had one wildcard playoff game to win, our backs are against the wall... I'm taking Smith and I dont care how counterintuitive it sounds.

Cutler is like Romo with a better arm but even worse decision making abilities... I'm going to take the guy capable of keeping defenses from going in dry every single time... just give my offense a shot.

RobBlake 12-17-2014 08:00 PM

there are a "handful" of qbs that could beat rodgers in a shootout.

ChiefGator 12-17-2014 08:00 PM

I blame Alex's short passing on Reid.. last year there was a point where he talked about Alex pushing it down the field more. He worked on it, and Alex did. And he was largely successful at it.. look at the playoff game for example.

This year, I think Reid has decided his WR's are shit and is giving Alex instructions to play very safe. Once we get behind, all of a sudden he can find the gumption to go down field, and largely successfully.

I blame coaching entirely this year.

ChiefGator 12-17-2014 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RobBlake (Post 11199390)
there are a "handful" of qbs that could beat rodgers in a shootout.

Three?

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefGator (Post 11199391)
I blame Alex's short passing on Reid..

Alex was in love with 3-yard passes for 2 years before Andy Reid.

He is who he is. He will never change. He could make Megatron look pedestrian.

ThaVirus 12-17-2014 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 11199363)
Of course not, but neither can Cutler... but if I only had one wildcard playoff game to win, our backs are against the wall... I'm taking Smith and I dont care how counterintuitive it sounds.



Cutler is like Romo with a better arm but even worse decision making abilities... I'm going to take the guy capable of keeping defenses from going in dry every single time... just give my offense a shot.


Fair enough.

You're comparing Cutler to Romo, though, and that isn't really helping your argument. Romo is, and has been, a great QB.

Chief Roundup 12-17-2014 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 11199413)
Romo is, and has been, a great QB.

Not without DeMarco Murray having this kind of year he has not.

keg in kc 12-17-2014 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefGator (Post 11199391)
This year, I think Reid has decided his WR's are shit and is giving Alex instructions to play very safe.

I think there's about zero chance of that, but who knows.

Easy 6 12-17-2014 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 11199413)
Fair enough.

You're comparing Cutler to Romo, though, and that isn't really helping your argument. Romo is, and has been, a great QB.

Its not unfair IMO... they're just slightly different versions of each other.

The one thing in common for sure is that both have been given loaded offenses that they couldnt get over the hump... we can digress into "what about the defense" stuff all night long, but we cant have our cake and eat it, too.

Its a symbiotic thing to some extent no matter how badly we all want to separate the two to make our various arguments... if they both had dialed it down to the dreaded checkdown more often, their names probably wouldnt be so synonomous with fail.

I love the big play with all my heart, watching a guy like Rodgers for instance makes me say "see! thats how the mfing game is played!"... hence my continued crush on Bray/Cutler? lol... but still, theres so much more to it all than that and you certainly know it.

Its called playing football and not long ball, for a reason...

splatbass 12-17-2014 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11198703)
Cutler has a lower floor, but a higher ceiling

Alex just hovers around the mean, constantly

No risk, no reward

Cutler has been in the league a long time and has never gotten above the floor.

dls6501 12-17-2014 08:36 PM

The reason I have such a hard time comparing the two is because of what is asked of each of them. If Cutler was given the instruction by his coaches "do not turn the ball over. Dont worry about throwing touchdowns, getting first downs or anything aside from not throwing an interception" maybe he would look better than he does.

Alex is literally asked to do less than almost every starting quarterback in the league. Who knows if quarterbacks who are asked to do more could be successful playing Alex ball. My guess is they would, but its nothing more than that. A guess.

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 11199492)
Cutler has been in the league a long time and has never gotten above the floor.

He's had the exact same number of winning seasons as Alex.

Chief Roundup 12-17-2014 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RobBlake (Post 11199390)
there are a "handful" of qbs that could beat rodgers in a shootout.

I am not so sure about that. Rodgers throws the most TDs and least INTs. That is a hard combination to beat in a "shootout" situation.

TDs
Rodgers = 1 TD per 13 attempts
Manning = 1 TD per 13.9 attempts
Brady = 1 TD per 16.6 attempts
Brees = 1 TD per 18.7 attempts

INTs
Rodgers = 1 INT per 91.6 attempts
Manning = 1 INT per 46.9 attempts
Brady = 1 INT per 66.3 attempts
Brees =1 INT per 39.01 attempts

RobBlake 12-17-2014 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11199396)
Alex was in love with 3-yard passes for 2 years before Andy Reid.

He is who he is. He will never change. He could make Megatron look pedestrian.

Alex's style of play wins games and benefits a defense

Chief Roundup 12-17-2014 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11199501)
He's had the exact same number of winning seasons as Alex.

You know man you are way to obvious anymore. You use stats to bash Smith and then use Smiths stats to prop up whatever QB you sucking down this time.

RobBlake 12-17-2014 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 11199503)
I am not so sure about that. Rodgers throws the most TDs and least INTs. That is a hard combination to beat in a "shootout" situation.

TDs
Rodgers = 1 TD per 13 attempts
Manning = 1 TD per 13.9 attempts
Brady = 1 TD per 16.6 attempts
Brees = 1 TD per 18.7 attempts

INTs
Rodgers = 1 INT per 91.6 attempts
Manning = 1 INT per 46.9 attempts
Brady = 1 INT per 66.3 attempts
Brees =1 INT per 39.01 attempts

Sorry, i intended to convey that there are a slim pickin' of QBs that stand a chance of gunning it vs him.

WhiteWhale 12-17-2014 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11199210)
32nd ranked defense = 4-12 with Alex.

He only wins when the D shows up.

You dumbass. Even if one were to concede that point, that doesn't make him worse than Cutler!

Cutler has never won without a top 5 defense.

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 11199516)
You dumbass. Even if one were to concede that point, that doesn't make him worse than Cutler!

Cutler has never won without a top 5 defense.

Do you really think Alex has more skill as a QB than Cutler. LMAO

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-17-2014 08:48 PM

Two differing flavors of vomit.

ThaVirus 12-17-2014 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 11199471)
Not without DeMarco Murray having this kind of year he has not.


He is literally the same guy he's been all this time. The only difference is the coaching staff decided to smarten up and use that offensive line they'd been investing in so heavily along with Murray, who was criminally underused last season.

I don't have the exact stats but last season the Cowboys ran the ball something ridiculously low like 36% of the time when they had the lead. Anybody that watched could have told you they had a top 5 back in Murray waiting for the opportunity.

In short, the Cowboys just aren't asking Romo to carry the team anymore and now you're seeing how good he was this entire time.

WhiteWhale 12-17-2014 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11199525)
Do you really think Alex has more skill as a QB than Cutler. LMAO

Cutler has a stronger arm.

He also has a weaker brain, is an awful leader, and throws a shit ton of interceptions. Alex had bad luck with OC's, while Jay Cutler IS bad luck for OC's. He gets guys fired and they don't work in the NFL again, just like Faulk said.

I think Cutler has more physical ability than Alex Smith.

As a pragmatic results oriented person, I'd much rather have Alex on my team because he won't go out and lose games with boneheaded grbac style bullshit... though it's kinda like choosing between a hard shit sandwich and a soft shit sandwich. I'd rather have food instead of shit.

For you stupid ones, Alex and Cutler are the shit. I AM NOT AN ALEX SMITH FAN.

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 08:57 PM

I dunno about "weaker brain." Alex struggles reading defenses. Sure, it doesn't lead to INTs...it just leads to sacks and pointless scrambles.

stevieray 12-17-2014 08:59 PM

...this is siily.

Chief Roundup 12-17-2014 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevieray (Post 11199558)
...this is siily.

Yeah but it is fun to troll the biggest troll this site has ever seen.

Hammock Parties 12-17-2014 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 11199584)
Yeah but it is fun to troll the biggest troll this site has ever seen.

Got it, got it. So you don't ACTUALLY believe that Alex Smith is better than Cutler. You're just trolling.

jspchief 12-17-2014 09:18 PM

I bet the Packers are really happy about Clausen starting this week.

Chief Roundup 12-17-2014 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11199593)
Got it, got it. So you don't ACTUALLY believe that Alex Smith is better than Cutler. You're just trolling.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Williams (Post 11199531)
Two differing flavors of vomit.

Smith is better IMO because he won't **** it up and helps the other phases of the game.
But come the end of the day as much as I hate to admit it the second post is pretty close. One is projectile vomit that burns and hurts and is over quickly the other you have to be patient and let it come on out of there over several attempts.

Ragged Robin 12-17-2014 09:33 PM

mccown is better than cutler

WhiteWhale 12-17-2014 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11199549)
I dunno about "weaker brain." Alex struggles reading defenses. Sure, it doesn't lead to INTs...it just leads to sacks and pointless scrambles.

Look, I'm not going to say Alex is better than Cutler. They're 2 QB's of similar caliber with completely different strengths and weaknesses. They're both pretty shitty, but are better than the bottom rung of the league. Alex plays timid and makes the safe throw and moves past his first read way too quickly, but Cutler plays STUPID and reckless. I'd rather have a smart timid QB than a stupid, bold, strong armed QB.

So I'd rather have Smith.

Now if I had Randy Moss or some other cheat code WR in their prime, I'd rather have Cutler. Cos he has a stronger arm and ALL HE HAS TO DO is throw it up there. On a team with a bad OL and bad WR's I'd take Alex every time.

WhiteWhale 12-17-2014 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Williams (Post 11199531)
Two differing flavors of vomit.

I didn't notice this.

I compared them to two differing consistencies of shit sandwiches, but close enough.

Reerun_KC 12-17-2014 09:48 PM

Some serious beat downs happened in this thread. Cuttards in full pout mode.

Hoover 12-17-2014 09:49 PM

Jay Cutler is the second coming of Jeff George

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-18-2014 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 11199598)
I bet the Packers are really happy about Clausen starting this week.

I'll bet premium secondaries take the week off and sip Mai Tai's when the Chiefs are the next man up.

MahiMike 12-18-2014 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Count Alex's Losses (Post 11199301)
The only weak ones are the dumb homers...too scared to realize what is right in front of them. A flawed team, a flawed QB, a pointless franchise.

Sure miss that one week where you were a fan. Good times.

BigMeatballDave 12-18-2014 08:50 AM

On pure talent, Cutler is better.

Cutler is a heartless dipshit, though.

Pablo 12-18-2014 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballDave (Post 11200094)
On pure talent, Cutler is better.

Cutler is a heartless dipshit, though.

He's a real ****.

Always looks detached and completely remorseless for how bad he's ****ing up everything. Maybe it's just his droopy dumb face, but he gives off a serious '**** it' vibe.

Alex is just a pussy though. He may have "heart" so to speak, but you wouldn't know it by his play.

Dipshit or pussy? Tough call.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.