ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Who do Chiefs pick at 18? Who do you pick at 18? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=291665)

OnTheWarpath15 04-02-2015 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 11416076)
I am good with giving the line they have now a shot. Maybe a vet center for depth. They don't have to spend a single pick on the line. Sometimes you just have to give a guy like Kush a shot. Give Fulton another year to develop and if he falters you have a vet in Fanaika. Allen vs Stephenson should be a good camp battle as well.

Couldn't agree more.

I think they were pretty smart in addressing their OL issues in FA and trades - which allows them to use most of their 10 picks on difference makers.

RunKC 04-02-2015 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 11416072)
And we've drafted 5 in the Top 75 over the last 5 years, and it's been a waste of draft capital.

Big issue with that was coaching. Stephenson, Hudson and Asamoah don't fit what Andy wants in an OL. Completely different scheme from what I remember.

The Franchise 04-02-2015 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 11416076)
I am good with giving the line they have now a shot. Maybe a vet center for depth. They don't have to spend a single pick on the line. Sometimes you just have to give a guy like Kush a shot. Give Fulton another year to develop and if he falters you have a vet in Fanaika. Allen vs Stephenson should be a good camp battle as well.

I wouldn't be against grabbing a guard or tackle in the 3rd-5th round range if they're the BPA at that point. Like a John Miller or Rob Havenstein. I just don't see OL as the BPA at #18 though. There are number of CBs that would fit better.

The Franchise 04-02-2015 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 11416091)
Big issue with that was coaching. Stephenson, Hudson and Asamoah don't fit what Andy wants in an OL. Completely different scheme from what I remember.

Hudson didn't fit what Andy wants in an OL? ****ing bullshit. He was such a bad fit that we tried to re-sign him.

OnTheWarpath15 04-02-2015 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 11416091)
Big issue with that was coaching. Stephenson, Hudson and Asamoah don't fit what Andy wants in an OL. Completely different scheme from what I remember.

Where do you get this shit?

If Stephenson doesn't fit the scheme, why is he getting a shot to start at RT?

OnTheWarpath15 04-02-2015 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dicky McElephant (Post 11416093)
Hudson didn't fit what Andy wants in an OL? ****ing bullshit. He was such a bad fit that we tried to re-sign him.

Also, this.

Pasta Little Brioni 04-02-2015 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dicky McElephant (Post 11416092)
I wouldn't be against grabbing a guard or tackle in the 3rd-5th round range if they're the BPA at that point. Like a John Miller or Rob Havenstein. I just don't see OL as the BPA at #18 though. There are number of CBs that would fit better.

I can agree with that. Mid to late rounds I definitely would not mind. At 18.....ughhhh

Pasta Little Brioni 04-02-2015 05:45 PM

The biggest boost to the line would be Fisher putting on his big boy pants and owning souls

RunKC 04-02-2015 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dicky McElephant (Post 11416093)
Hudson didn't fit what Andy wants in an OL? ****ing bullshit. He was such a bad fit that we tried to re-sign him.

Hudson did an awesome job no doubt. But I think there's a reason Allen and Stephenson went to get bigger and stronger?

I think Andy likes the power scheme type OL who can be athletic like the zone blocking guys. IIRC Sorter said we played some zone.

I think that last year was so catastrophic bc Reid had big plans for Allen and Stepehenson to get bigger to be more like "maulers" but keeping that athleticism.

BossChief 04-02-2015 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dicky McElephant (Post 11416093)
Hudson didn't fit what Andy wants in an OL? ****ing bullshit. He was such a bad fit that we tried to re-sign him.

For 6m per (what was reported that we offered) he would have been a good signing.

He wasn't worth 9

Meatloaf 04-02-2015 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dicky McElephant (Post 11416093)
Hudson didn't fit what Andy wants in an OL? ****ing bullshit. He was such a bad fit that we tried to re-sign him.

Only thing that didn't fit with Hudson was his $$$ demands. As Reid said, Hudson was fortunate that he was pretty much the only good free agent center available. He hit the market at the right time......otherwise, I suspect he'd still be a Chief.

OnTheWarpath15 04-02-2015 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 11416153)
The biggest boost to the line would be Fisher putting on his big boy pants and owning souls

Truth.

Hell, I'd be happy if he started playing like a 1st rounder.

Would be a bonus if he started playing like a #1 overall pick.

Saccopoo 04-02-2015 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 11416155)
Hudson did an awesome job no doubt. But I think there's a reason Allen and Stephenson went to get bigger and stronger?

I think Andy likes the power scheme type OL who can be athletic like the zone blocking guys. IIRC Sorter said we played some zone.

I think that last year was so catastrophic bc Reid had big plans for Allen and Stepehenson to get bigger to be more like "maulers" but keeping that athleticism.

Stephenson's combine numbers were one of the best, if not the best, I've ever seen from an offensive lineman. 4.94 40. 35.5" vertical at 6'6", 312 lb. Insane. He has good feet and comes up and out from his stance extremely fast.

The one thing that was a legitimate criticism was his lack of functional playing strength. He was not strong like bull. It's obvious why he dipped into the PED's which led to his suspension. If he can get to the point where he's weight trained himself into his natural athleticism, I think he can be one of the better tackles in the league.

If not...eh.

Allen was primarily viewed as a career backup OL guy at four positions. Valuable to a team, but I've never seen him as a starter in the league. He doesn't have the athleticism to be a edge protector or the strength to function effectively in the box. However, he can play either guard or tackle position and gives the team a security blanket for the entire line.

Personally, I could see them going offensive tackle in the first and then an interior guy in the third.

If La'el Collins is there, it's not a bad pick, though I doubt he's going to be available.

As I stated in Draft Planet, I think that Oregon's Jake Fisher is one of the most viable options for the Chiefs in the first round. He fit's Dorsey's profile to a "T" and is a nasty ****er on the field.

Don't be too surprised if his name is read on Draft day when the Chiefs pick.

If that doesn't jibe with you, you better start hoping to hell that this team gets Stephenson the Balco vitamin regime or gets Derek Sherrod's head back into football. Otherwise, there is a definite possibility of having Fisher bookends come opening game 2015.

RunKC 04-02-2015 06:29 PM

Sac, how do you feel about DJ Humphries? If we pick OL at 18 I would want him.

Mr. Laz 04-02-2015 06:41 PM

Trade down and hopefully get another 2nd

1st Rd - OLB/S Shaq Thompson

Can fill Eric Berry or Derrick Johnson spot


2nd Rd - Best WR
2nd Rd - Best OL or CB

let the freak out begin LMAO

BossChief 04-02-2015 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 11416204)
Trade down and hopefully get another

OLB/S Shaq Thompson

Can fill Eric Berry or Derrick Johnson


2nd - Best WR
2nd - Best OL or CB

let the freak out begin LMAO

Ya know....that guy has a nearly unlimited ceiling if he can land somewhere with a coaching staff that knows how to utilize his talents.

Mr Versatility.

Pasta Little Brioni 04-02-2015 06:47 PM

Every player named "Shaq" gets overrated.

Sweet Daddy Hate 04-02-2015 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 11415905)
Most teams that spent two 3rds, two 2nds, and the #1 overall pick on OL from 2010-2013 wouldn't be in the position we're in right now.

That doesn't mean we didn't invest high enough picks. It means we suck at drafting that position.

But at some point you can't keep burning picks on the same position group over and over again. You have to keep your options open. It's like when the Chiefs wasted a fart ton of high draft picks in the 2000s trying to find just ONE DT worth a measly ****. Wanna know why our drafts sucked so much? Because a position we had no clue how to judge talent for was our central goal every ****ing time we tried to draft somebody.

Damn, the Chiefs are smarter than I thought then. This clearly explains the lack of high round QB's and why they should probably continue to stay away.

Mr. Laz 04-02-2015 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 11416212)
Ya know....that guy has a nearly unlimited ceiling if he can land somewhere with a coaching staff that knows how to utilize his talents.

Mr Versatility.

Sutton loves throwing a bunch of safeties out there at the same time

Thompson would be great for that

DaneMcCloud 04-02-2015 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 11414677)
If Mariota is there at 18 you wouldn't take him?

Personaly, I think that Petty has the highest ceiling in this class and if the Chiefs took him in the first, I wouldn't complain because there's so much WR depth and even offensive line depth.

He would be a steal for the Chiefs in the second, IMO.

DaneMcCloud 04-02-2015 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 11414721)
Dorial

:Lin:

Why would anyone advocate taking a poor route runner that hasn't played football in two years, when so many other WCO WR's that could contribute immediately are available?

If DGB played at freaking Clemson, no one on Chiefslpanet would have heard of him, let alone, advocate for him.

milkman 04-02-2015 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 11415856)
Lets start with the Champs.

A 1st and 2nd, (both tackles) then a 4th, 5th and UDFA as starters.

Packers? I mean, a good QB needs all 1st rounders to be successful, right?

Only one starter drafted before the FOURTH round.

I'm not going to spend all day doing this so you can point to Dallas and say "I told you so".

I wish someone had the time, but I'd bet anything that league wide, there are more late round starters playing OL than any other position group.

The reality is that we don't have Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers, or even Russel Wilson.

Hell, just name about any of the playoff QBs last year.

We have Alex Smith.
He's not elite, and the only way he reaches 2nd tier status is if you provide him with the very best protection you can.

He can be highly efficient if you do, and we, as a fanbase, have to hope to hell that highly efficient is good enough.

milkman 04-02-2015 07:13 PM

I've said it before.
Marcus Marriota looks like the next Alex Smith.

I'll pass.

OnTheWarpath15 04-02-2015 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 11416249)
The reality is that we don't have Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers, or even Russel Wilson.

Hell, just name about any of the playoff QBs last year.

We have Alex Smith.
He's not elite, and the only way he reaches 2nd tier status is if you provide him with the very best protection you can.

He can be highly efficient if you do, and we, as a fanbase, have to hope to hell that highly efficient is good enough.

But by the time these newly drafted OL are hitting their prime, hopefully Alex is gone.

We should be drafting for the future, not for the next two years.

Hog's Gone Fishin 04-02-2015 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 11416253)
But by the time these newly drafted OL are hitting their prime, hopefully Alex is gone.

We should be drafting for the future, not for the next two years.

Zach Martin

Baby Lee 04-02-2015 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 11416253)
But by the time these newly drafted OL are hitting their prime, hopefully Alex is gone.

Geez, I HOPE it doesn't take them another 6 years before they pay off.

Meatloaf 04-02-2015 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 11416182)
Stephenson's combine numbers were one of the best, if not the best, I've ever seen from an offensive lineman. 4.94 40. 35.5" vertical at 6'6", 312 lb. Insane. He has good feet and comes up and out from his stance extremely fast.

The one thing that was a legitimate criticism was his lack of functional playing strength. He was not strong like bull. It's obvious why he dipped into the PED's which led to his suspension. If he can get to the point where he's weight trained himself into his natural athleticism, I think he can be one of the better tackles in the league.

If not...eh.

Allen was primarily viewed as a career backup OL guy at four positions. Valuable to a team, but I've never seen him as a starter in the league. He doesn't have the athleticism to be a edge protector or the strength to function effectively in the box. However, he can play either guard or tackle position and gives the team a security blanket for the entire line.

Personally, I could see them going offensive tackle in the first and then an interior guy in the third.

If La'el Collins is there, it's not a bad pick, though I doubt he's going to be available.

As I stated in Draft Planet, I think that Oregon's Jake Fisher is one of the most viable options for the Chiefs in the first round. He fit's Dorsey's profile to a "T" and is a nasty ****er on the field.

Don't be too surprised if his name is read on Draft day when the Chiefs pick.

If that doesn't jibe with you, you better start hoping to hell that this team gets Stephenson the Balco vitamin regime or gets Derek Sherrod's head back into football. Otherwise, there is a definite possibility of having Fisher bookends come opening game 2015.

Sac, back in the 2012 draft Our Lads had Allen rated as the 3rd best guard. They had Stephenson as the 15th rated Tackle. Kiper had Allen as the 6th rated tackle and Stephenson as the 14th rated tackle. So, (not that it means much now), Allen was generally higher rated than Stephenson by both Our Lads and Kiper. Methinks people are selling Allen a bit short.

Also, I heard through buddy of buddy of buddy (yeah, I know, not exactly firsthand), that when Stephenson got nailed with the suspension last year, he kind of turned "internal" and simply quit working out for those 4 weeks. Needless to say, the coaching staff was not enamored with the shape he was in upon his return. Anyway, the word now is that Stephenson redoubled his training efforts and is ready to go.

Not sure what to make of this, but since we're a little short of football stuffs, thought I'd toss it out there.

As per Jake Fisher, my sense is that the "knock" on him is that he (like Eric Fisher) needs to get stronger. If true, not sure he'd contribute much next year. Nonetheless, such a selection wouldn't surprise me at all.

Saccopoo 04-02-2015 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 11416190)
Sac, how do you feel about DJ Humphries? If we pick OL at 18 I would want him.

He's sloppy. Or, moreso, he plays sloppy looking. His feet are nice, he positions himself well, but he seems to be all over when defending, especially on run blocking. On pass protection he keeps a good base under him and stays on his guy.

I'm not sure he plays strong. He gets after dudes, but he doesn't manhandle them when he locks onto them like Collins or Fisher does. He's a puncher and it looks like he tends to keep his hands really high on defenders. I don't know if that's a good thing, but it's worked for him so far on the college level.

He's got the tools. I'm surprised he doesn't look more tight technically after being in that program.

I think he's a left tackle only.

splatbass 04-02-2015 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 11415819)
Good organizations find fatties in the mid-late rounds and save their early picks for playmakers.

Give me some examples.

Saccopoo 04-02-2015 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Meatloaf (Post 11416260)
Sac, back in the 2012 draft Our Lads had Allen rated as the 3rd best guard. They had Stephenson as the 15th rated Tackle. Kiper had Allen as the 6th rated tackle and Stephenson as the 14th rated tackle. So, (not that it means much now), Allen was generally higher rated than Stephenson by both Our Lads and Kiper. Methinks people are selling Allen a bit short.

Also, I heard through buddy of buddy of buddy (yeah, I know, not exactly firsthand), that when Stephenson got nailed with the suspension last year, he kind of turned "internal" and simply quit working out for those 4 weeks. Needless to say, the coaching staff was not enamored with the shape he was in upon his return. Anyway, the word now is that Stephenson redoubled his training efforts and is ready to go.

Not sure what to make of this, but since we're a little short of football stuffs, thought I'd toss it out there.

As per Jake Fisher, my sense is that the "knock" on him is that he (like Eric Fisher) needs to get stronger. If true, not sure he'd contribute much next year. Nonetheless, such a selection wouldn't surprise me at all.

Allen works hard, has a great attitude and knows the game. He's just "good" across the board versus having elite traits in certain areas. He's a very functional reserve, the #1 dude at four positions, on a decent team.

I agree with you on Fisher. He could stand to add some mass and strength, but he absolutely gets after dudes on the field. Mean as shit and aggressive. Maybe too much at times, but he also has a high level of athleticism, moves exceptionally well laterally and has great form on both pass and run protection. But it will probably take a year to get him to play at the NFL level in terms of strength and technique.

As I've stated, I think that there are two guys who are plug-and-play for this team on the offensive line in this draft - La'el Collins at RT and John Miller at RG. (I also like Miller as a potential Center, but he'd require time to get that position down.) Both are very fundamentally sound, play nasty and would work well in this system. Other than that, it's projects and potential.

CoMoChief 04-02-2015 08:38 PM

Erving or Laell Collins and Lockett in the 2nd

The Franchise 04-02-2015 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 11416408)
Allen works hard, has a great attitude and knows the game. He's just "good" across the board versus having elite traits in certain areas. He's a very functional reserve, the #1 dude at four positions, on a decent team.

I agree with you on Fisher. He could stand to add some mass and strength, but he absolutely gets after dudes on the field. Mean as shit and aggressive. Maybe too much at times, but he also has a high level of athleticism, moves exceptionally well laterally and has great form on both pass and run protection. But it will probably take a year to get him to play at the NFL level in terms of strength and technique.

As I've stated, I think that there are two guys who are plug-and-play for this team on the offensive line in this draft - La'el Collins at RT and John Miller at RG. (I also like Miller as a potential Center, but he'd require time to get that position down.) Both are very fundamentally sound, play nasty and would work well in this system. Other than that, it's projects and potential.

I really want Miller in the 3rd. Put him at RG day one.

RealSNR 04-02-2015 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 11416380)
Give me some examples.

Packers.

Patriots (who have only spent their #1s on tackles, the way you should do it).

Ravens

Steelers

Bengals

Basically, a **** ton of teams not named the Cowboys, 49ers, or Seahawks.

The Broncos? What the **** do you call them?

Also, guess who's NOT in this class of teams? The Chiefs.

TribalElder 04-03-2015 01:22 AM

Getting Alex moar tight ends to check down to is the best plan

DGB would probably end up like Baldwin if we drafted him in the first round

The Franchise 04-03-2015 09:34 AM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>From <a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet">@RapSheet</a> and me: Per the Leon County jail, FSU CB PJ Williams -- a prospective 1st-rounder -- was arrested for DUI at 3:08 AM today.</p>&mdash; Albert Breer (@AlbertBreer) <a href="https://twitter.com/AlbertBreer/status/584015181770010624">April 3, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

O.city 04-03-2015 09:46 AM

Get him in the 4th round now.

Mr. Laz 04-03-2015 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TribalElder (Post 11416703)
Getting Alex moar tight ends to check down to is the best plan

DGB would probably end up like Baldwin if we drafted him in the first round

So DGB would suck in san fran with the uber QB Kapernick too?

TambaBerry 04-03-2015 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dicky McElephant (Post 11416930)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>From <a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet">@RapSheet</a> and me: Per the Leon County jail, FSU CB PJ Williams -- a prospective 1st-rounder -- was arrested for DUI at 3:08 AM today.</p>&mdash; Albert Breer (@AlbertBreer) <a href="https://twitter.com/AlbertBreer/status/584015181770010624">April 3, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

I'd still take him just a dui lol

staylor26 04-03-2015 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dicky McElephant (Post 11416930)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>From <a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet">@RapSheet</a> and me: Per the Leon County jail, FSU CB PJ Williams -- a prospective 1st-rounder -- was arrested for DUI at 3:08 AM today.</p>&mdash; Albert Breer (@AlbertBreer) <a href="https://twitter.com/AlbertBreer/status/584015181770010624">April 3, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

I love news like this bc we have a GM who will take advantage of that value if he falls.

Chief Roundup 04-03-2015 09:55 AM

The Chiefs are likely to draft Andrus Peat. They should draft a Malcolm Brown or Eddie Goldman.

Saccopoo 04-03-2015 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dicky McElephant (Post 11416930)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>From <a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet">@RapSheet</a> and me: Per the Leon County jail, FSU CB PJ Williams -- a prospective 1st-rounder -- was arrested for DUI at 3:08 AM today.</p>&mdash; Albert Breer (@AlbertBreer) <a href="https://twitter.com/AlbertBreer/status/584015181770010624">April 3, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

Lessens the asking price and teaches a valuable lesson all in one shot.

I really, really like PJ Williams for this defense. IMO, best CB in this draft for what Sutton runs. (Williams then Eric Rowe.)

Might drop him to our second rounder...

The Franchise 04-03-2015 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 11416967)
Lessens the asking price and teaches a valuable lesson all in one shot.

I really, really like PJ Williams for this defense. IMO, best CB in this draft for what Sutton runs. (Williams then Eric Rowe.)

Might drop him to our second rounder...

Now if we could just get one of those top WRs to fall to our pick.

O.city 04-03-2015 10:07 AM

This is his 2nd run in with the cops. Developing a pattern

Meatloaf 04-03-2015 10:08 AM

Not sure I want dumb, irresponsible guys on our team. However, young guys are often dumb and irresponsible. So, if interested in this guy, I'd check his ass out all the way up to the small intestine before I'd draft him. Maybe, just maybe, this incident may assist in the maturation process. On the other hand, it might be an indication of a simple idiot who will always be a simple idiot.

What's with it with these guys anyway? Sitting on the edge of a fantastic opportunity and then go and get blasted/arrested. Dumb is as dumb does.

Sheesh.

O.city 04-03-2015 10:11 AM

If I'm ok taking a guy with off field issues, why wouldn't I rather have Peters? Seems to have more upside

The Franchise 04-03-2015 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11416978)
If I'm ok taking a guy with off field issues, why wouldn't I rather have Peters? Seems to have more upside

Big difference between DUI and issues with coaches.

Bowser 04-03-2015 10:33 AM

Will Shields was a third round pick. Hall of Famer. Probably the best lineman to ever play for the Chiefs.

Dave Szott was a seventh round pick. Rock solid his entire career.

Tim Grunhard was a second round pick. Arguably the least talented of his group he played with, albeit a great center (that never played guard! OH THE HORROR!!)

Brian Waters was a ****ing UDFA that played another position entirely before switching to o-lineman. Arguably the MOST talented lineman of the bunch.


The point is you don't blow first round picks on interior lineman. And this year's version of the Chiefs especially needs playmakers taken early and often in this draft, on both sides of the ball.

RunKC 04-03-2015 10:36 AM

PJ Williams was a fringe 1st rounder to begin with. I bet he could fall to round 3 with this incident. A steal if we could get him there.

Bowser 04-03-2015 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 11417015)
PJ Williams was a fringe 1st rounder to begin with. I bet he could fall to round 3 with this incident. A steal if we could get him there.

Shit, take him in the second. Don't even gamble if he'll be there in the third.

OnTheWarpath15 04-03-2015 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 11417008)
Will Shields was a third round pick. Hall of Famer. Probably the best lineman to ever play for the Chiefs.

Dave Szott was a seventh round pick. Rock solid his entire career.

Tim Grunhard was a second round pick. Arguably the least talented of his group he played with, albeit a great center (that never played guard! OH THE HORROR!!)

Brian Waters was a ****ing UDFA that played another position entirely before switching to o-lineman. Arguably the MOST talented lineman of the bunch.


The point is you don't blow first round picks on interior lineman. And this year's version of the Chiefs especially needs playmakers taken early and often in this draft, on both sides of the ball.

Glad someone gets it.

If you know what you're doing, you don't necessarily need them at tackle either - certainly not RT.

ChiTown 04-03-2015 10:45 AM

BAFB

/titus

O.city 04-03-2015 10:53 AM

Meh, I'm sure you can find hall of fame guards that were early picks too.

The Chiefs problem is thag they e sucked at drafting. No matter what position, they've sucked

Bowser 04-03-2015 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11417042)
Meh, I'm sure you can find hall of fame guards that were early picks too.

The Chiefs problem is thag they e sucked at drafting. No matter what position, they've sucked

Then by all means, let's keep throwing shit at a wall to see what sticks, and then next season we can all sit around saying we should have taken (name playmaking position here).

There are a glut of playmakers to be had in the first round this year. I will not be happy if we take a guard/center/d-tackle guy/3-4 end guy.

The Franchise 04-03-2015 11:00 AM

Guards taken in the 1st round since 2001.

2014 - None
2013 - Jonathan Cooper, Chance Warmack, Kyle Long
2012 - David DeCastro, Kevin Zeitler
2011 - Mike Pouncey, Danny Watkins
2010 - Mike Iupati
2009 - None
2008 - Branden Albert
2007 - Ben Grubbs
2006 - Davin Joseph
2005 - Logan Mankins
2004 - Vernon Carey
2003 - None
2002 - Kendall Simmons
2001 - Steve Hutchinson

RunKC 04-03-2015 11:01 AM

I think the 3rd round is a great area to draft an OL. Get your playmakers early this year and then fill that hole later.

The Franchise 04-03-2015 11:03 AM

Centers taken in the 1st round since 2001

2014 - None
2013 - Travis Frederick
2012 - None
2011 - Mike Pouncey
2010 - Maurkice Pouncey
2009 - Alex Mack
2008 - None
2007 - None
2006 - Nick Mangold
2005 - Chris Spencer
2004 - None
2003 - Jeff Faine
2002 - None
2001 - None

OnTheWarpath15 04-03-2015 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11417042)
Meh, I'm sure you can find hall of fame guards that were early picks too.

The Chiefs problem is thag they e sucked at drafting. No matter what position, they've sucked

I'm sure you can as well.

Again, I believe it is MUCH easier to find a fatty that can start for your organization in the late rounds than it is to find a playmaker/difference maker late.

You have to go back to 2008 for the last difference maker we've drafted in the 4th or later. (Carr)

In that same time period, we've used NINE picks on OL/DL in the first three rounds.

Easy 6 04-03-2015 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 11417072)
I believe it is MUCH easier to find a fatty that can start for your organization in the late rounds than it is to find a playmaker/difference maker late.

Makes a ton of sense, I'd have to agree.

O.city 04-03-2015 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 11417072)
I'm sure you can as well.

Again, I believe it is MUCH easier to find a fatty that can start for your organization in the late rounds than it is to find a playmaker/difference maker late.

You have to go back to 2008 for the last difference maker we've drafted in the 4th or later. (Carr)

In that same time period, we've used NINE picks on OL/DL in the first three rounds.

I'm not disagreeing with that premise, but the chiefs problem again, hasn't been position picked as much as just taking poor players, and moreso, having a shitty organization to develop them after they've been pIcked.

I think that's the bigger issue, in that between marty and andy, there wasnt much development of said players once picked.

I believe that's changed with this regime in that they have a good staff in place to develop players. Now they need to keep acquiring talent. Position wise I don't really get to hung up on, but I wouldn't be too excited about a first round center, that's for sure, but I wouldn't reach for a wr or whatever just because he plays a premium position.

Mr. Laz 04-03-2015 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 11416204)
Trade down and hopefully get another 2nd
1st Rd - OLB/S Shaq Thompson
Can fill Eric Berry or Derrick Johnson spot
2nd Rd - Best WR
2nd Rd - Best OL or CB
let the freak out begin LMAO

on that note

Chiefs picks:

1st round - OLB/S Shaq Thompson
2nd round - TE Maxx Williams
2nd round - WR Tyler Lockett

Saccopoo 04-03-2015 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dicky McElephant (Post 11417071)
Centers taken in the 1st round since 2001

2014 - None
2013 - Travis Frederick
2012 - None
2011 - Mike Pouncey
2010 - Maurkice Pouncey
2009 - Alex Mack
2008 - None
2007 - None
2006 - Nick Mangold
2005 - Chris Spencer
2004 - None
2003 - Jeff Faine
2002 - None
2001 - None

Chiefs should have taken Alex Mack in 2009. I wanted Alex Mack as our pick in 2009.

The Franchise 04-03-2015 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 11417177)
Chiefs should have taken Alex Mack in 2009. I wanted Alex Mack as our pick in 2009.

At #3?

Chief Roundup 04-03-2015 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 11417172)
on that note

Chiefs picks:

1st round - OLB/S Shaq Thompson
2nd round - TE Maxx Williams
2nd round - WR Tyler Lockett

Why would we draft an OLB in the first?

Saccopoo 04-03-2015 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dicky McElephant (Post 11417188)
At #3?

Yep.

****ing mind blowing, isn't it?

The Franchise 04-03-2015 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 11417196)
Yep.

****ing mind blowing, isn't it?

Could you imagine this board if we took a center at #3? ROFL

Chief Roundup 04-03-2015 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 11417196)
Yep.

****ing mind blowing, isn't it?

ROFL idiot

Saccopoo 04-03-2015 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 11417200)
ROFL idiot

Go look at the first round of that draft and tell me who has been the best player since that was taken in that first round.

Saccopoo 04-03-2015 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dicky McElephant (Post 11417198)
Could you imagine this board if we took a center at #3? ROFL

I got some shit about it at the time if I remember correctly.

Mr. Laz 04-03-2015 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 11417191)
Why would we draft an OLB in the first?

because he might be the best BPA at the time

We need help at LB and S, he is both

OnTheWarpath15 04-03-2015 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dicky McElephant (Post 11417188)
At #3?

Damn near anyone would have been a better pick than Tyson Jackson.

Couldn't have done much worse.

Chief Roundup 04-03-2015 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 11417207)
Go look at the first round of that draft and tell me who has been the best player since that was taken in that first round.

Not the point and you know it is not the point.
You don't take C in the first round let alone in the top 5 idiot.

Chief Roundup 04-03-2015 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 11417226)
because he might be the best BPA at the time

We need help at LB and S, he is both

So you want us to spend our 1st on a tweener that is for depth. We can get some depth for those positions later not in the first.

The Franchise 04-03-2015 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 11417232)
Damn near anyone would have been a better pick than Tyson Jackson.

Couldn't have done much worse.

Knowing that now? Yeah. This board would have flipped its shit more than we did over the TJ pick if we had picked a center.

Saccopoo 04-03-2015 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 11417245)
Not the point and you know it is not the point.
You don't take C in the first round let alone in the top 5 idiot.

If he's the best player in the draft, sure you do.

You'd rather take a busto like Darrius Heyward-Bey or Aaron Maybin because of the position they play is deemed an "exciting" position by the casual fan versus a perennial All-Pro because he's on the offensive line?

If we had an even decent LG this past season, this team would have been in the playoffs.

You tell me what's a more important position when push comes to shove...

Mr. Laz 04-03-2015 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 11417251)
So you want us to spend our 1st on a tweener that is for depth. We can get some depth for those positions later not in the first.

it includes a trade down first


unless one of the key WR falls to us or something

i assume that even shelton will be gone

Saccopoo 04-03-2015 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 11417226)
because he might be the best BPA at the time

We need help at LB and S, he is both

Dude...

Geez...

For realz?

A 6', 220 lb. outside linebacker that runs a 4.64? For a 34?

You own a "Paul Dawson for President" t-shirt too?

The Franchise 04-03-2015 01:05 PM

I just don't see a fit for Thompson on this team.

Chief Roundup 04-03-2015 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 11417275)
If he's the best player in the draft, sure you do.

You'd rather take a busto like Darrius Heyward-Bey or Aaron Maybin because of the position they play is deemed an "exciting" position by the casual fan versus a perennial All-Pro because he's on the offensive line?

If we had an even decent LG this past season, this team would have been in the playoffs.

You tell me what's a more important position when push comes to shove...

With hindsight sure but without it absolutely you do NOT take a C in the first and for damn sure not in the top 5.

Chief Roundup 04-03-2015 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dicky McElephant (Post 11417304)
I just don't see a fit for Thompson on this team.

I don't either. He is a 4-3 OLB. He would have to shift inside. There are and will be better ILB when we are on the clock.

Saccopoo 04-03-2015 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 11417313)
With hindsight sure but without it absolutely you do NOT take a C in the first and for damn sure not in the top 5.

I would have. Advocated it at the time.

Mack was the best center prospect I've ever seen at the collegiate level.

****ed dudes up. Bad.

I take that guy at #3, especially when our choices were coming down to guys like Mark Sanchez, Tyson Jackson, etc.

(Although I would have been okay with Eugene Monroe as that would have given us the potential of sliding over Albert to LG, which he said he was willing to do if they drafted Monroe.)

Mack was the best player in that draft, regardless of position, IMO.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.