Pats, Raiders, Broncos, Chargers, Steelers and Colts fans all do...

They will have metaphorical lynch mobs waiting in the stands for Tyreek when we visit their stadiums.

Strap in because trolls are coming.

I did this

Satuo wants proof the Hill didn't do something, in order to believe he didn't do something.

This is probably accurate.

Nothing says "legit" like a Word document on Scribd. ROFL


That said, hope it's all true. Certainly seems reasonable.

Or you know...the front page of the KC Star.

If there's one thing you deserve respect for, it's being able to dodge a coat hanger while in the womb.

I don't have a cheetah in this fight (other than desiring a Super Bowl win or three), but my sources tell me that there are no legitimate sources who have established that, "both Hill and Espinal have admitted to investigators that they spanked the 3-year-old with ... a belt."

Link?

FAX

ROFL
LMAO

I love FAX in a strictly non-homosexual way.

Ahem ... our investigators never arrived at that conclusion.

Actually, our working theory was that Baby Mama's Mama or Daddy were the prime suspects. It was either they or Meredith or another babysitting extended family member.

Granted, we should have looked closer at Baby Mama early on in this case.

FAX

Far from it ...

Clearly, that guy is planning to run for higher office.

FAX

look at this ****ing clown

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I&#39;m surprised no one in the comments pointed one MAJOR flaw in this story. <a href="https://t.co/bjwV0QRVfX">https://t.co/bjwV0QRVfX</a></p>&mdash; Carrington Harrison (@cdotharrison) <a href="https://twitter.com/cdotharrison/status/1142928221266202625?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 23, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Sorry ... even under the influence of Boone's Farm and high doses of psychotropic substances, I cannot bring myself to consider that gaggle of morons to be a "legitimate source".

Half the time, they can't even recite their own call letters correctly.

FAX

Too many commas?

He is completely missing the point that this all started when Hill attempted to leave Crystal and cut her off the NFL teet. He is attempting to claim the story is based on it all starting with Crystal trying to extort Hill before he got paid.

FAX THE ENTIRELY ACCURATE is entirely accurate.

Go look at her goddamn instagram.

She was loving that life even if it was only a few hundred grand.

Daddy was Poverty Pat Mahomes - a failed baseball player who got fired from his college coaching gig.

She was already reaping the benefits of an NFL superstar lifestyle and was about to hit the big time.

Until Hill got wise.

there can only be so many actual inside sources here. I'm just wondering why one is believed more than another. (And i'm laughing right now because that's the same article that most here used to proclaim victory because it said he didn't break the arm) and ftr I don't know that I believe either article is 100 percent accurate. I have no way of knowing.

I LOVE IT!

There is a God after all!

And he's finally a Chiefs fan.

I think you're trying to convince the wrong guy.

The person you want to educate is that Harrison fella.

If memory serves, he's another social media peckerwood who has attempted to use this story to elevate his own name recognition.

FAX

But chiefs kingdom news services should be trusted?

There's a lot about this wacky deal that I don't understand either (and obviously never will). Nonetheless, I am attempting to keep my personal confusion to a minimum which is why I asked for clarification.

I just hadn't heard any report based on any legitimate source state that both Tyreek and Baby Mama had admitted to striking Damien with a belt. I've heard the rumors, of course ... but I was never aware that anything like that had been confirmed or validated in any way.

All I've ever wanted was the presumption of innocence to be honored and a Super Bowl win ... that's pretty much it.

Oh ... and I'd like Damien to be placed in a monastery to be raised by priests experienced in exorcism techniques.

FAX

LOL ... what?

Are you another one of them morans?

'Cause I'll tell you right now ... I don't cotton to no morans.

FAX

That makes no sense LMFAO.

So tyreek wanted to leave Christal (let's ignore the fact he proposed to her) and instead of just taking the child support money for their 3 kids, she would rather tyreek get kicked out of the league entirely leaving all of them broke? And if it was a true extortion attempt, why not wait until he gets his 60mil guaranteed?

There's no logic to that theory at all.

ROFL
He is. He showed up on the scene spewing idiocy.

The Espinals aren't bright people?

No. But I'm sure that will be my label since right now I seem to have similar views to sauto and king right now. I wasn't trying to say you viewed this article more legitimate than the other but it's just funny that so many on here will call one article more legitimate just because it fits their belief better than another. Nobody has any named sources or has proven to be more accurate than any one else to this point.

They being engaged means nothing when it comes to current status of their relationship.

And a woman scorned, a crazy ass woman at that, will do all kinds of shit. She didn't want cut off, she wanted him to stay and get married.

It makes as much sense as any other break up revenge bullshit scenario.

Do you seriously believe she isn't nuts? The fact she stayed with Tyreek should tell you she is nuts to begin with.

What you need to be looking at are all the things that haven't happened.

That's a stupid copout. You can't present a illogical scenario and act like it's legitimate just because you think the people involved, that you don't know btw, might be illogical also.

Wait / What? You, "Have no way of knowing." No links??? Looks like you're just gonna have to be a brave little lad and trust your instincts then - as misguided as they may be...

She didnt stay, they got back together. And if she's crazy doesn't that make tyreek nuts to get back with her and propose to her?

Miss me with this shit you dumb ****, I called this two months ago. So suck my dick

Now, now ... there'll be no dick-sucking in this thread, thank you very much.

FAX

Tyreek isn't the sharpest tool in the shed either. Duh.

Abused women stay with their abusers all the time. That's part of the abuse. It's one of the biggest problems with domestic violence cases and how they are resolved.

Both of them seem like they're not great people. It's not like Tyreek looks like a good person in any of this. The only difference is that Tyreek plays on our favorite team and she doesn't.

Holy shit. Is Tycopeland Brook?

because

he

was

leaving

her

the tape was blackmail to get him to not break up with her

she was going to lose custody of those kids, too, because she's an awful mother

she was going to get NOTHING

the tape was a cheap ploy at keeping custody, ****ing over tyreek while at the same time taking all his child support money

might have worked if he wasn't the fastest man in america ROFL

He's smarter than a lot of people think.

Just because a person speaks a certain way, it doesn't mean there's a correlation to intelligence.

After all, he did pick up Wally's offense faster than anyone expected (including Wally). Plus, he did everything he was supposed to do in order to satisfy his plea arrangement ... and it appears he's smart enough to hire a good attorney to deal with this case. IMO, he's no dummy ... just verbally inarticulate in white man terms.

FAX

huge possibility look at the join date! lol If not, her boyfriend or whatever!

At least get my name right.

This is all fair, but really my view on this is simple.

I don't know what happened and we likely never will.

I do know what hasn't happened, and that is no charges, no evidence of anything more than they may not be the best parents and Tyreek has not been implicated in ANYTHING regarding his son at this point. Nothing.

I dont buy the DA's bullshit grand standing narrative we don't know who did "it" because if there was a crime you charge them both and work it out in the process. It very much appears liek they cant make the case they want to make.

Its spelled Brooke.

Go and watch his youtube channel.

Not a dumb person.

Staying with crazy baby momma, not very smart. And now he is about to have 3 kids with her.

DA got baited and was trying to save face. He didn't.

Hopefully they aren't even his kids.

That'd be the icing on the cake. ROFL

A threat to charge someone with something doesn’t go very far when any defense attorney already knows reasonable doubt exists. Real life isn’t Law and Order. Sometime suspects do hold the cards.

They can’t make this case because the timeline is not established and they can’t reasonably prove guilt of any one party.

Most prosecutors won’t charge a case when they know they have no chance of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

And that, my friend, is what L'amore can do to a fella.

It can make a grown man cry and a strong man weak. It can make a fast man slow and a smart man look like the dumbest motherf***er in town.

FAX

I think there's something that happened but not major enough to press charges. Something like she beats him hard and tyreek punches him in the chest. Things that are bad but not jailworthy. They both have to be taught how to parent and punish their kids better. [All of this is just a guess so I could be 100% wrong]

Think Tyreek will be suspended 4 games and it won't be appealed.

Hey guys, anything going on today?

I do.

They didn't have proof of an actual crime. How hard is that to understand?

Troof.

I agree with pretty much all of this but Im guessing 2 games or less. Depends on what he was able to provide the NFL in his defense, that is something we will never know.

This article keeps getting deleted on the chiefs reddit sub but "Matt Cassel getting some much deserved love!" stays up. All you need to know about the dipshits on reddit.

reddit is a joke of a site, don't go there lol.

They had bruising and welts significant enough to believe it was far beyond a reasonable bout of corporal punishment with a belt.

Sometimes you know a crime has been committed but can’t prove who did it. Hardball only works when there are teeth to the hardball threat.

If someone broke into your house and stole all your stuff but left no evidence behind, you’d know a crime was committed but no charges could be filed.

If a dead body turns up with no teeth or fingerprints and is burned beyond visible recognition, it would be known a murder was committed but not able to charge someone unless a witness saw the dump.

Extreme examples, yeah. But still true.

So Carrington’s beef with the article was that Tyreek couldn’t have been close to a deal last year because Tyreek couldn’t have signed a deal on year 3.

If thats the case then their case was weak as shit to begin with.

Interesting

I doubt DFS would speak to the NFL and I don’t know about the contract stuff

It's still there/

https://www.reddit.com/r/KansasCityC...ased/?sort=new

But we have text messages where Tyreek states that he never hurt the child and Crystal admits that in fact SHE did and then lied and blamed him for it. Text messages that (according to his attorney) have been forensically verified.

That is not definitive proof that Tyreek has never gone too far punishing his son but it certainly should color one's opinion regarding this whole case.

You can't charge them both with the same crime. Both lawyers just blame the other person. Ruins credibility.

He's been wrong all along, so you are probably right

Most likely true.

If roles had been reversed in that text, Tyreek Hill's career is over right now.

Double standard from SAUTONIAN bullshit artists.

You absolutely can, and then you use them against each other.

It's a good idea in theory i guess.

What if neither play ball?

LMAO
Exactly the case. With or without links...

Yep, but wanted so badly to be right.

Sure, but it's not going to go well for the prosecution if they can't even determine who actually did it. They're not in the business of losing cases.

Most domestic violence cases are pretty reliant on witness testimony to begin with. When there isn’t an immediate report of an incident and the victim is a toddler, it gets really thin/flimsy unless there’s a reliable witness who describes what happened.

Obviously that is not the case here.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">So one clarification on the Hill article and his contract. He can&#39;t sign until after his third year. The sides, however, can discuss numbers and concepts of a new deal. That is what I was referring to in the article. I wasn&#39;t clear and I will own that.</p>&mdash; The Chiefs Kingdom (Ver 2.0) (@1_ChiefsKingdom) <a href="https://twitter.com/1_ChiefsKingdom/status/1142962902187384832?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 24, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This isn't domestic violence its child abuse. Evidence of said abuse shouldn't be hard to come by, You are way over thinking this.

The broken arm issue has been resolved from everything I can tell, there is nothing else other than some level of bruising and welts which obviously aren't enough to do anything from a charge standpoint.

The reality is the biggest evidence against Hill is an incident from 5 years ago that has no actual relevance to this case.

Thats not what he said in a reply, dude is already back tracking. Good grief.

Clarification is not backtracking.

This! :clap:

I read that wrong I thought it was that Carrington clown changing his opinion on what the major flaw in the article was.