Haha! Tebow is the only QB that could get the True Fans blood pumping.

Clausen


but given the almost 0% of it happening, Berry

It should tell you that you don't know what you are talking about.

Every offensive coach at USC told Carroll that Sanchez should start over Booty but he wouldn't do it.

They held an open competition btw. Leinart and Cassel and Leinart was the better QB by consensus.

Sorry, but I think the dumb*** percentage is taking a over-hyped S with the 5th pick when you have holes all over your team.....OL, DL, LB, WR.

Winning NFL football teams have good front lines, period.

Berry will be a good NFL player, but he is nowhere near a #5 value.

Berry will not even be the best NFL safety in this draft. There it is you can save this quote and bring it back later. Just don't lose it when it becames a correct statement.

But we have a LT. You really think RT should be picked at #5?

I would be good with any of those three choices.

dude......your first argument is completely idiotic. "Why draft a safety when that is one hole, but we have other holes as well like OL, DL, LB and WR. Those are 4 of our 5 holes. Why pick safety as the hole to fill?" With that logic the same thing would be said for drafting anybody.

Eric Berry will be a stud in this league and we need a safety badly and he will be a great one. If we had the #1 pick, I'd still want us to draft him.

You do realize that KC has a first round pick at LT and 2 TOP 5 PICKS on the DL don't you????? :banghead:

TBH none of those guys played worth a shit last year really.

so does when/where they were drafted really make a difference if they suck?

yes,yes,yes ... Albert was good in his 1st year so he gets more time.

Huh, all of those players were taken in the last 2 years. It's not like they are a bunch of vets sucking it up.Tyson Jackson (bad value or not) has only played one season, Dorsey improved in year 2. D-lineman generally take 3 years to develop for the most part, so I really don't see the problem with either of them at this point. You can get a nose after round 1. This team was fine with Albert at LT the last part of the season. Taking a lineman at 5 this year would be foolish.

Wow. 25 people actually think we should go OT at 5? Dumb...
Posted via Mobile Device

Well, we now know that Shox is reeruned...
Posted via Mobile Device

Yeah....but take a look at the names.

abnchieffan, Brianfo, bruno, chefs fan in omaha, CHENZ A!, Chieftain58, cmh6476, Duck Dog, Frankie, King_Chief_Fan, KnowMo2724, orange, Otter, Pawnmower, Renegade, RJ, rocks, rrl308, Saccopoo, Shox, Steve, tarheel23, tymania, UTChief, warpaint*


KnowMo2724 and orange can be taken out because they're Bronco fans.

Pawnmower and Saccopoo are all over the offensive line's nuts.

CHENZ A! is really the only one that bottles my mind.

So about a lot of Chiefs fans wanting us to draft Clausen.

Would you prefer that we draft Sam Bradford if the Rams were to take Clausen? I know it's probably not happening, but doesn't that tell you anything about Clausen if there are 2 QBs worthy of a 1st round pick and the #1 pick is choosing Sam Bradford over Clausen? Bradford, a spread QB and most here would probably say that he is not going to make a good pro. Not to mention that Bradford is coming off of a major injury. But the Rams are choosing him over Clausen? why is that? If Clausen is going to be so great, then why are Rams taking Sam "Mr. Injury Spread" Bradford instead of Clausen?

Jamarcus Russell was drafted number one overall a couple of years ago. Teams are talked into doing reeruned shit all the time.