![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
He'll be fine but if you signal fair catch - you catch that Gosh Damn ball!
|
Quote:
|
Loww Floor will be Skyy''s nickname if he keeps ****ing up
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I think his new nickname should be:
Dirty Drawers He's always shitting his pants. |
Quote:
He’s pretty much right where I expect him to be at this point and I think you’re going to see his role increase after the bye and by the time we’re going into the postseason, he’s going to be a real weapon. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
FWIW Andy clearly put Patrick’s INT on Skyy in the postgame today. Called it a “learning moment” for him (he said Skyy didn’t come back inside correctly on the route).
I think there was a lot to read from the comment. If anything it gives light as to why Skyy is still being eased into the role. Andy did say he and Patrick worked it out and that he has Patrick’s trust, but that may have been part of Andy pulling a positivity sandwich after being so real about a player’s blunder in the press conference. I’m a big fan of Moore FTR |
Quote:
|
I'm getting pretty pissed off at the insistence on making him PR. I know Toub isn't whiffing these catches but FFS the technique is horrible, what has he been taught with some of these attempted laces catches. It also IS a different skill and not every decent WR is going to master it. You just know Toub's going to use it as some BS "character" test and keep trotting him out there rather than just admitting the experiment is a s**t one and needs to be ended.
I like Moore, shame to hear the INT was on him but I really don't want to give up on this guy this early. He DOES need more snaps in my opinion but if he's making route mistakes you can see why it's a slow start. |
Yeah, coming from Western Michigan to Andy's offense is a giant step. Kid needs time.
|
Quote:
You remember how ****ing god awful that guy was at the start of his career? And he was ****ing terrible for like 2.5 years? It's been 7 games for Moore. Christ. Put a pacifier in your mouth and shut the **** up, you giant baby. |
I don't know why you guys can't grasp the concept that this offense takes time to fully digest. That there are multiple reads both pre-snap and post snap for the receivers, and when they're not on the same page, it looks ugly. And THAT is how games like Indy happen.
Moore was never going to step in, be the day one #1 and rack up stats. No rookie would. No, not even Pickens. It was always going to take time. Even the vets like Juju and MVS are just now starting to fully grasp it. It's not simply a play drawn up on paper to be memorized. It's fluid, it changes based on what the defense does in real time, and it's not easy to execute those reads and do it WITH Mahomes on the fly. He'll be fine. |
Quote:
DJLN is usually right. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Will he be better than Hardman? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But I'll at least explain myself (in extremely long-winded fashion) and go on the record either way. Makes it easier to have instances of correct opinions when you have opinions on pretty much everything... But for the record, I'm still wrong less often than most. |
Pretty horrible start to his career. Pickens or Pierce look like much better options that we could have had. Hopefully he can turn it around.
|
So ****ing sick of hearing about George ****ing Pickens. Who ****ing cares?
|
Quote:
The kiss of death. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
He still has an elite trait...his "separation burst". He recieves the ball very well from what little I have seen. I was hoping to see more from him by this point, and I think we will by December, but I imagine a great deal of time, effort, and reps have gone to JSS and MVS, in an attempt to get THESE veterans where they need to be...if it has taken them a few months to produce at a high level, you can imagine how long it takes a rook. Catching punts is mostly confidence...imho it is on the coaches for putting a unconfident player in a position to fail. He should do better, yes, but today's punters are kicking 50 yd knuckleballs and he should have a mental break.
|
Quote:
MVS is firmly in the latter camp, IMO. I watch him play and just do not understand why he gets a rep as having stone hands. I think it really does come down to one bad year and one spectacularly bitchy quarterback throwing him the football and then gesticulating wildly when it doesn't go his way. Watching Moore receive the ball, he does have good catch technique. He should be a really reliable underneath weapon when he figures out the routes and especially when he figures out how to diagnose defenses and work himself into the soft spots in zone coverages (which he simply wouldn't have seen as much due to the lower level of competition he faced in college). If he can start to do that more, he'll see more man matchups where he can use his short area quickness to get open. I still don't see - at ALL - what Staylor sees with this idea that he's going to be a premier boundary receiver and not a guy who works primarily from the slot. But I still think a Sterling Shepard kind of player can still be had there. There are things to like - he just has a fair ways to go yet. |
Moore is the perfect inside/slot WR. He's got a good stab with his hands, pulls the ball in clean, and has pretty good separation in short spaces. The guy was made for the middle of the field, IMO.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Robinson was a flyer. Who else have they drafted over the last 5 years that they had any reasonable expectation of success with? I think the reason they drafted Moore is obvious, especially when combined with the addition of MVS and the continued presence of Hardman. They weren't looking to replace Hill's downfield speed - they found that elsewhere. They were looking to replace Hill's short area quickness. It's just a matter of pursuing a skill-set. If they don't retain JJSS and/or Hardman, they'll be pursuing completely different skill-sets in this coming draft. It's not hard to see what they were trying to do. It's just not the route I'd have gone. |
Quote:
He's on an Andy Reid coached team, where he slow plays rookies and gives them limited snaps. And who is he supposed to be getting snaps over exactly? Obviously not Kelce, JuJu, or MVS. Maybe Hardman/Watson? How exactly is he supposed to get 50-100 yards a game when he's sharing snaps at the #3/#4 position? If we had ZERO talent or experience at WR, sure, Moore would probably be starting every game and be given all the snaps. But that's not how our team is structured right now. |
Pickens has played at least 70% of the snaps and they are force feeding him the ball. FFS they are return to rid themselves of Chase Claypool. Much different than Skyy Moore sitting behind Juju, MVS and Hardman.
When Hardman is gone next year I think you’ll see more of Skyy doing the things he did. But in terms of the draft, no I would not have wanted Pickens in a redraft. I’d have gone with Sam Williams instead |
People are really bitching about not drafting Pickens? Why? So you could be in his thread bitching about the fact that he's not getting targets or starting?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Looking forward to seeing him get more involved in the passing game
and maybe less involved in special teams |
Sam Williams or Drake Jackson would have been a nice pick there
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
WR/RB is a different story. Until proven otherwise their track record suggests they take players with limited skill sets to fill niche roles instead of just drafting elite talent on offense. |
Quote:
This is where I'm at. I can live with a rookie receiver running a bad route that leads to an INT. That's going to happen. I can live with the fact that we have enough depth to not force him into a big role too early. But let's end the punt return experiment. That's clearly not a strong suit of his. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yeah, we drafted CEH over Taylor. You know who else passed on Taylor before Indy drafted him? 29 other teams. It’s not like we were talking about Marshall Faulk or Eric Dickerson here. Taylor was not an obvious ‘must have’ pick for teams that were looking for a RB. In hindsight, we shouldn’t have drafted CEH, but neither Taylor, who wouldn’t have been utilized in this offense the way he is in Indy. If we were wanting to increase the explosiveness of our offense, we should have grabbed a WR like Tee Higgins or Claypool. Hindsight is a beautiful thing. As far as comparing McDuffie or Moore to ANYONE right now, it’s an exercise in futility at this point. We’re not even halfway into their rookie seasons yet. That story has not been written yet. And that’s not even taking into account McDuffie has been injured (thanks to a stupid field) and only played a half of football and Moore’s situation (4th on the WR depth chart) is completely different than Pickens, who basically is being treated like a #1 or #2 WR on a weekly basis and being force fed the ball. The situations are completely different and not even remotely comparable. Put Pickens on the Chiefs and Moore on the Steelers and what do you think each guys numbers look like right now? I swear some in this thread need to get a grip on reality . . . . . . |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
For the record, I do think that Veach is a good gm but he’s certainly not above criticism. The good news is that we’re 5 and 2 with an underwhelming contribution (so far) from the 2022 draft class. |
It's odd to me that people expect young WRs to get a significant number of snaps. Andy ALWAYS protects young guys. Add that to the fact that Skyy has looked...let's just say iffy...and I don't expect that to change much.
I'm not down on the kid and think he has a lot of upside. But it's pretty clear that we need to give him a chance to develop a bit before he's gonna move the needle much for us. |
Quote:
If you're saying this in regards to him as a WR, that's just ridiculous hyperbole. It's amazing that people can't separate him as a WR from him as a PR. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The only thing I would have changed from yesterday is once we had assured the win, I would have manufactured some plays to Skyy. Even in the years they were slow rolling Hill and Hardman they'd toss them a screen or put them on a jet sweep to get them involved in the offense. We're not doing that for Skyy. Wish they would have done that just to keep his spirits up and just get the ball in his hands to get easy yards and possibly a breakout play.
|
Quote:
And I'm not someone who says 2nd rounders should be immediate starters or anything like that. But thus far the kid has 6 catches for 100 yards through 7 games - that ain't great. As a WR, he and Justin Watson have been 6 in one hand, half dozen in the other. Over the last 4 weeks Moore has been getting about 20 snaps/gm - roughly 1/3 of the game. He's put up 5 catches in those 4 games. 11 targets for 70 yards. He just...exists. He ain't bringing much to the party here, fellas. I mean the production is very clearly underwhelming. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
That seems like solid production to you? Because here's the frustrating part - no matter what - some folks would've had an excuse for him. Give him 2 historically pedestrian veteran WRs in front of him and it's "Well he can't get any targets with those two guys in front of him!!" but setting aside that they ain't exactly Taylor and Rice here, take those two away and you'd have just pivoted. It would be "Well he's the only weapon they have, defenses can key on him!!!" Right now it's "well Andy Reid has a really complicated scheme..." but if the Broncos had drafted him it'd be "Well what do you expect, Hackett ****ing sucks!" Y'all just want him to be good soooooooo baaaaaaad that you won't just acknowledge whats in front of you. A 1/3 snap share yielding a sub 50% catch rate and less than 7 yards/target ain't good. At all. Where was your bold prediction on him prior to the season? You really gonna say that by the bye week you would've expected him to be on pace for about 15 catches and 250 yards? I suspect not. He's disappointed to this point. |
Quote:
All we can do is look at what he is doing and he seems to be doing his job but he's just not getting his number called yet. Why the **** are we complaining? We knew coming into the season he was burried in the depth chart. We've got the #1 offense in the NFL and we are sitting here complaining about our current #4 WR? Dear god. This is an embarrassing hill to die on 7 weeks into a rookies career playing for a coach you know slow plays rookies out of the gate. |
It's. A. Football. Forum.
In the Skyy Moore thread. Who's dying on a hill here? But hey - GREAT work stating a case. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You think your boy Pickens would be lighting shit on fire here? Not even Tyreek Hill was doing that and his snap counts are pretty much identical week for week through 7. It wasn't until week 8 that he saw a significant jump in playing time. |
Quote:
Look, I didn't like the pick, but only because I liked a different available receiver. I think he has the potential to be really good in this offense. But he isn't currently better than Hardman. I still believe that Hardman has potential to be a very good receiver, and his speed can't be dismissed because he is a half step slower than Tyreek Hill, as it's still elite. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
All we need is the pr guy to catch the ball and that's it. This is not 10 years ago. We don't need punt return yards.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
One of the greatest athletes to ever play the position was straight ballin out to the tune of 30 YPG. |
Quote:
Skyy is a 2nd rounder who is expected to contribute at least something playing with Patrick Mahomes. Even by the slow WR standards of the Reid offense he's behind right now. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
So far regardless of snap count, Skyy had been a disappointment based on what he was advertised as. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But hey - he's got Robinson beat. Bully. We've gone over this. Y'all have a 'yeah but' and an excuse for everything. You convinced yourselves 1st that Moore was the 'best WR in the draft class' and then 2nd that he was actually doomed to fail afterall because of Andy. The possibility that the 13th wide receiver drafted just isn't gonna be some turnkey ****ing stud just will not be considered. |
Are we really going to act like Hill was a 5th round pick because of talent?
|
I am hoping we see Skyy her more reps in the coming weeks. I think he'll be just fine.
|
Quote:
'Yeah, but...' |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.