ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football **** The Official Free Agency Thread **** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=247561)

DMAC 07-28-2011 03:09 PM

Broncos are getting Luck.

Crush 07-28-2011 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DMAC (Post 7781624)
Broncos are getting Luck.

They will win just enough to miss out on him. They'll suck so bad that they'll suck at sucking. Suck.

keg in kc 07-28-2011 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 7781604)
1. A winning situation helps every malcontent's attitude.

2. Pats play ALOT of 4-3 and sub packages. One Pats beat writer said they were in base 34 less than 50% of the time last year.

3. BB is great at fitting schemes to players, not forcing players into schemes. If he thinks he will get the most out of Haynesworth in a 4-3, then we'll play more 4-3. Not that big a deal.

4. He's coached Lawrence Taylor, Corey Dillon and Randy Moss. I'm confident he did his Due diligence and is confident he can handle Haynesworth, at least for a few years.

You're not telling me anything I don't already know, and haven't already mentioned, for the most part.

Saying it's "risky" is not inferring that it's "bad," only that there's a risk involved. Which I think we can probably all agree. I mean, if there wasn't risk involved, he wouldn't have been available in the first place. In other words, they're gambling on this move, and it may pay off. Or it may not.

I don't like this move nearly as much as I liked Dillon or Moss, but that doesn't mean it can't work.

Just Passin' By 07-28-2011 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DMAC (Post 7781624)
Patriots are getting Luck.

Just to piss off the rest of the league. :thumb:

OnTheWarpath15 07-28-2011 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7781631)
You're not telling me anything I don't already know, and haven't already mentioned, for the most part.

Saying it's "risky" is not inferring that it's "bad," only that there's a risk involved. Which I think we can probably all agree. I mean, if there wasn't risk involved, he wouldn't have been available in the first place. In other words, they're gambling on this move, and it may pay off. Or it may not.

I don't like this move nearly as much as I liked Dillon or Moss, but that doesn't mean it can't work.

I guess I don't see the risk.

A 5th round pick is nothing to BB.

If dude acts out or causes a problem, adios.

rocknrolla 07-28-2011 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBOSHO (Post 7781508)
Bill isnt giving any ****s this offseason.

He's going full Al Davis.
Posted via Mobile Device

SAUTO 07-28-2011 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7781618)
Guess we weren't interested.

Who's left at RT?

just because he signed somewhere else?

big assumption

Los Pollos Hermanos 07-28-2011 03:18 PM

Patriot talk is boring.

#nooffense

OnTheWarpath15 07-28-2011 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 7781642)
just because he signed somewhere else?

big assumption

Not just because, but it's definitely a factor.

There wasn't a single rumor that we were interested, and he went to ****ing Buffalo.

I'm guessing he didn't draw as much interest as we all thought, or teams lowballed him.

RUSH 07-28-2011 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 7781642)
just because he signed somewhere else?

big assumption

Buffalo definitely threw the bank at him. I'm going to guess that once the numbers come out then we will all be happy he's not a Chief.

Rams Fan 07-28-2011 03:25 PM

Reportedly, the Rams have a deal done with Scott Shanle.

Old Dog 07-28-2011 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iowanian (Post 7781589)
Somebody family eating the FAT opossum TaNight!

I LOLd @ this....rep to you, Sir

Pants 07-28-2011 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DMAC (Post 7781624)
Broncos are getting Luck.

:Lin:

booger 07-28-2011 03:27 PM

I would have liked to see KC take a run at Clabo but i never expected it.

Pioli won't go after Falcons FA's and get into a possible bidding war when Dimitroff is the GM. Not just because of their friendship but they share plenty of scouting info like they do with the Pats, Phins(maybe to a lesser extent now that Parcells is gone) and somewhat the Ravens in that Pioli is also close to Newsome.

It's not that i agree with that sort of thing i just accept that's how he operates. It was obvious in year #1 w/Pioli when he said out of respect for BB he wouldn't try to sign FB Heath Evans if he knew the pats were trying to resign him.

OnTheWarpath15 07-28-2011 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan (Post 7781662)
Reportedly, the Rams have a deal done with Scott Shanle.

If true, another solid signing.

Nothing earth-shattering out of Earth City, but some solid additions.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.