ChiefsPlanet
Page 21 of 28 « First 1117181920 21 22232425 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Article: Chiefs Most Likely Landing Spot for Foles (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=269947)

suds79 02-15-2013 04:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demonpenz (Post 9405957)
Andy Reid runs lots of swing passes and screens and we need a QB that can do that well.
I've got your back.

http://gifrific.com/wp-content/uploa...nders-Feet.gif

Sincerely,

Matt Cassel

DaneMcCloud 02-15-2013 04:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9405962)
Talking mainly about the insults. Anyone against drafting Sanchez was a True Fan dumsonofabitch.
Maybe AFTER the draft but not before.

I don't think there was anyone that even remotely believed that Pioli would take Sanchez after trading for Cassel.

O.city 02-15-2013 04:46 PM
I'd also assume if we take Foles, we probably won't draft a QB early.


Maybe take someone like Dysert or Bray later?

Mr_Tomahawk 02-15-2013 04:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9405965)
I'd also assume if we take Foles, we probably won't draft a QB early.


Maybe take someone like Dysert or Bray later?
I am fine with this.

O.city 02-15-2013 04:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9405964)
Maybe AFTER the draft but not before.

I don't think there was anyone that even remotely believed that ***** would take Sanchez after trading for Cassel.
I think this would probably be a similar situation, non necessarily in terms of talent, but early pick etc.


Atleast we know Foles knows Reids offense though.

O.city 02-15-2013 04:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 9405967)
I am fine with this.
Yeah, if Bray lasts that long is the only question. I think he would be there at the START of the first, but we likely would/will have to give that pick up for Foles.

Nightfyre 02-15-2013 04:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9405932)
Talk down? What the **** are you talking about?

ANY Chiefsplanet member that challenges the idea of anyone other than Smith met with a barrage of insults. It's ****ing ridiculous.

Any member of the PRESS who challenges the notion of anyone other than Smith is met with a barrage of insults.

Get a ****ing grip: You or none of those people that so strongly advocate for Smith, or that insult and barrage other forum members, has absolutely ANY say in the matter.

It's the most ****ing reeruned thing I've ever witnessed in 12 years of Chiefsplanet and that's saying a lot.
Are you really going to make me dig through the Dane McCloud draft prognostication history here to point out your hypocrisy - once again?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9405961)
No, absolutely not.




Now, I DID go on a rampage after Jackson was selected but I certainly didn't hijack threads in the Lounge because of Sanchez.




He wasn't really an option anyway because ***** traded for Cassel.
http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...t=Mark+Sanchez


Too Easy. Hmm on February 4, 2009...

Pasta Little Brioni 02-15-2013 04:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9405971)
Yeah, if Bray lasts that long is the only question. I think he would be there at the START of the first, but we likely would/will have to give that pick up for Foles.
Foles can keep his ass in Philly man.

DaneMcCloud 02-15-2013 04:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 9405973)
Are you really going to make me dig through the Dane McCloud draft prognostication history here to point out your hypocrisy - once again?

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...t=Mark+Sanchez


Too Easy. Hmm on February 4, 2009...
What am I looking for, Dumbass?

Also, I can give you a full list of responses about Sanchez in which I stated I'd take Stafford before him. Furthermore, there are several in March & April about Sanchez and NO WHERE did I say I'd be "Done" if the Chiefs didn't select him.

O.city 02-15-2013 04:59 PM
Foles is a different situation than we've had before. If Reid and Dorsey think he's better than any of the QB's in this draft and wanna hitch their wagons to him for a third or 4th round pick, cool. I'll see what happens with it.

Not the route I'd like to go, but it's a route to go.

The Franchise 02-15-2013 05:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 9405973)
Are you really going to make me dig through the Dane McCloud draft prognostication history here to point out your hypocrisy - once again?

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...t=Mark+Sanchez


Too Easy. Hmm on February 4, 2009...
Link a ****ing post.....not an 8 page thread.

Pasta Little Brioni 02-15-2013 05:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9405982)
Foles is a different situation than we've had before. If Reid and Dorsey think he's better than any of the QB's in this draft and wanna hitch their wagons to him for a third or 4th round pick, cool. I'll see what happens with it.

Not the route I'd like to go, but it's a route to go.
Sorry if the Eagles decide to piss him away for a 3rd or 4th, that's a huge red flag for me. Yeah, yeah the system, but still.

Nightfyre 02-15-2013 05:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9405978)
What am I looking for, Dumbass?

Also, I can give you a full list of responses about Sanchez in which I stated I'd take Stafford before him. Furthermore, there are several in March & April about Sanchez and NO WHERE did I say I'd be "Done" if the Chiefs didn't select him.
You can read through your responses and reflect upon the nature of your hypocrisy with respect to your post deriding Geno supporters. I trust a well-educated and successful person such as yourself should be able to do that honestly. My point is made. Good day, sir.

O.city 02-15-2013 05:03 PM
New coaches mean new QB's. The Eagles and Foles are a unique situation. For that system, he really has no value anymore for them, it seems.


If you wanna argue that systems are made to fit good players, thats a solid argument and understandable. Hell at this point, we don't know what type of system they will run in Philly. Foles might very well be in their plans. I doubt at this point they think Vick will stay healthy all year and that backup they signed probably isn't the best guy to play many snaps.

DaneMcCloud 02-15-2013 05:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 9405991)
You can read through your responses and reflect upon the nature of your hypocrisy with respect to your post deriding Geno supporters. I trust a well-educated and successful person such as yourself should be able to do that honestly. My point is made. Good day, sir.
Bull ****ing shit. Your point is NOT made.

I've read my responses to those people that believed that Aaron Curry was MORE VALUABLE than a QB. That's as ludicrous today as it was in 2009.

I read my responses to those that felt like Colt McCoy and Bradford were better prospects than Stafford.

Who was right? Furthermore, NO WHERE did I spam threads or did I say was DONE or anything of that nature.

You lose.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:43 AM.
Page 21 of 28 « First 1117181920 21 22232425 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.