ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Expectations and Alex Smith (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=271413)

Hammock Parties 03-24-2013 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9525403)
What does his YPC look like, and how does that compare to others?

We haven't discussed this and it's a huge negative.

2012 he didn't qualify for the rankings, but he hit 11.4 YPC, which would have been 23rd.

2011 he was 11.5, or 24th.

http://www.pro-football-reference.co...12/passing.htm

Cassel not surprisingly was 31st and 27th. :LOL:

Oh, Josh Freeman was 2nd. o:-)

OrtonsPiercedTaint 03-24-2013 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 9525469)
2001 was not a rebuilding year in the vein of 2009. It was a lot closer to what it looks like this year is shaping up to be. And with a new system being installed, it took Trent Green (who already knew the system) a year to get things going. I think it's reasonable to hope for the best in year 1 with Alex Smith but judge him on the results of year 2.

You kinda get what you pay for. Green cost the #12 with a 5th round kick back. Cassel is about what you get for a second. Smith should be better, but not by much.

Edit:My bad #12

BossChief 03-24-2013 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbook (Post 9525169)
All right. Im all in that Joeckel will not be the pick

Call a sportsbook if you want to lose the farm.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9525183)
When we took Berry he was 9/4...OL was 1/3

Vegas knows

Hammock Parties 03-24-2013 11:08 AM

35th in sack percentage in 2012
29th in 2011.

LMAO

Coogs 03-24-2013 11:12 AM

You know. We still have the 1st pick in the draft. And Geno hasn't been claimed by any other team yet.

I might be one of the very few, but I still think he is a possibility. Even with the addition of Alex Smith and Chase Daniel.

Chris Meck 03-24-2013 11:12 AM

Guys, I wasn't super stoked about the Alex pick-up either, but he's way better than Matt Cassel. Cassel, the last two years, has been the worst NFL QB that I've ever seen. Smith is probably like the 15th or so best QB in the NFL.

He's middle of the road. He's not great, and he doesn't suck. NO, that's not good enough, probably to win Super Bowls, which is why it's appropriate to not be excited about him.


Calling him Matt Cassel, however, is just silly. Cassel's stats are inflated by 2008 and 2010. He's been horrible since. Smith's numbers get better more recently. One is clearly ascending, one clearly descended. They're not the same guy at all.

OrtonsPiercedTaint 03-24-2013 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 9525518)
Guys, I wasn't super stoked about the Alex pick-up either, but he's way better than Matt Cassel. Cassel, the last two years, has been the worst NFL QB that I've ever seen. Smith is probably like the 15th or so best QB in the NFL.

He's middle of the road. He's not great, and he doesn't suck. NO, that's not good enough, probably to win Super Bowls, which is why it's appropriate to not be excited about him.


Calling him Matt Cassel, however, is just silly. Cassel's stats are inflated by 2008 and 2010. He's been horrible since. Smith's numbers get better more recently. One is clearly ascending, one clearly descended. They're not the same guy at all.

Yeah, Matt missed 1 game a season on average. Smith's is..I don't know how the math to seperate injury from benching.

opposition 03-24-2013 11:17 AM

Cant Quote but to earlier post. Alex 11.4 YPC

Peyton Manning, Romo, Shaub, Stafford and Roethlesburger(sp) were 11.5. I don't see how this is such a huge negative. I just don't feel YPC is really a good way to judge a QB due to different styles of play.

Rasputin 03-24-2013 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 9525518)
Guys, I wasn't super stoked about the Alex pick-up either, but he's way better than Matt Cassel. Cassel, the last two years, has been the worst NFL QB that I've ever seen. Smith is probably like the 15th or so best QB in the NFL.

He's middle of the road. He's not great, and he doesn't suck. NO, that's not good enough, probably to win Super Bowls, which is why it's appropriate to not be excited about him.


Calling him Matt Cassel, however, is just silly. Cassel's stats are inflated by 2008 and 2010. He's been horrible since. Smith's numbers get better more recently. One is clearly ascending, one clearly descended. They're not the same guy at all.

Eh they are the same, they both rely on the run game and take that away and force them to pass and they are in deep shit.

Hammock Parties 03-24-2013 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 9525518)
Cassel's stats are inflated by 2008 and 2010.

Matt Cassel has had two good seasons.

Alex Smith has had 1.5 good seasons.

Yay!

Rasputin 03-24-2013 11:19 AM

Am looking forward to duck season next year.

Hammock Parties 03-24-2013 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by opposition (Post 9525530)
Cant Quote but to earlier post. Alex 11.4 YPC

Peyton Manning, Romo, Shaub, Stafford and Roethlesburger(sp) were 11.5. I don't see how this is such a huge negative. I just don't feel YPC is really a good way to judge a QB due to different styles of play.

**** off.

All this asshole does is throw the ball short and that's why his YPC is low.

BigBeauford 03-24-2013 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 9525518)
Guys, I wasn't super stoked about the Alex pick-up either, but he's way better than Matt Cassel. Cassel, the last two years, has been the worst NFL QB that I've ever seen. Smith is probably like the 15th or so best QB in the NFL.

He's middle of the road. He's not great, and he doesn't suck. NO, that's not good enough, probably to win Super Bowls, which is why it's appropriate to not be excited about him.


Calling him Matt Cassel, however, is just silly. Cassel's stats are inflated by 2008 and 2010. He's been horrible since. Smith's numbers get better more recently. One is clearly ascending, one clearly descended. They're not the same guy at all.

Alex Smiths numbers are inflated by the 2011 season and half of 2012. He was horrible before that. Really they are pretty much the same guy.

milkman 03-24-2013 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 9525518)
Guys, I wasn't super stoked about the Alex pick-up either, but he's way better than Matt Cassel. Cassel, the last two years, has been the worst NFL QB that I've ever seen. Smith is probably like the 15th or so best QB in the NFL.

He's middle of the road. He's not great, and he doesn't suck. NO, that's not good enough, probably to win Super Bowls, which is why it's appropriate to not be excited about him.


Calling him Matt Cassel, however, is just silly. Cassel's stats are inflated by 2008 and 2010. He's been horrible since. Smith's numbers get better more recently. One is clearly ascending, one clearly descended. They're not the same guy at all.

I don't see him as ascending.

He has gotten coaching and playcalling to help him avoid failure.

That is how Cassel "succeeded" in '08 and '10.

opposition 03-24-2013 11:31 AM

To be fair not many QB's are successful without good coaching. Look at all your top QB's and look at the coaches. Flacco, Manning, Manning, Rodgers, Brees(look what happens with poor coaches), Wilson, Kaepernick, Brady all have good coaches.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.