ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Royals ***Official Royals vs Red Sox GDT - July 30*** (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=309011)

ChiTown 07-30-2017 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Melk Man Cometh (Post 12982792)
also,

my expectations are a bit tempered. Cleveland is a really, really good team with a really, really scary weapon (Andrew Miller). I expect them to win this division.

I think the Royals can win Wild Card slot 1, though - and I know they can win that game. I never doubt these Royals when it comes to postseason baseball. Salvy, Hosmer, Moose, Cain, Gordon and Escobar are winning baseball players. I hate using terms like, "winner", in athletics for intangibles - but nothing about this core tells me it doesn't apply, and doesn't win them games in October.

Hi Hootie

Pitt Gorilla 07-30-2017 07:26 PM

Anyone recall why we didn't move to resign Holland and Madson when we had the opportunities?

Melk Man Cometh 07-30-2017 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 12982798)
Hi Hootie

is this some sort of game?

Do I ever appear to hide behind these mults? I PURPOSELY out myself with themed mults and PURPOSELY post exactly how I've always posted.

You think I'm trying to SBInfinity these things?

Melk Man Cometh 07-30-2017 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 12982804)
Anyone recall why we didn't move to resign Holland and Madson when we had the opportunities?

Madson IS NOT a pitcher you want in the postseason. Ew.

Holland was a MAJOR risk who signed a MASSIVE 1 year deal with built in incentives pushing his deal now towards 2 years - $32M with the Rockies

you think the Royals should have offered him something like that when he was reported to be hitting 88 MPH velocity?

I wish the Royals could have gotten him for 2 years - 12M (or something) and pay for his rehab year in hopes he'd give us a solid year this year - but Holland held out and got a GREAT prove-it deal from Colorado which may able him to opt out and then get like 3/40+ on the open market in the offseason

Good for him, by the way.

ChiTown 07-30-2017 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Melk Man Cometh (Post 12982805)
is this some sort of game?

Do I ever appear to hide behind these mults? I PURPOSELY out myself with themed mults and PURPOSELY post exactly how I've always posted.

You think I'm trying to SBInfinity these things?

Apparently, it is a game

duncan_idaho 07-31-2017 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 12982804)
Anyone recall why we didn't move to resign Holland and Madson when we had the opportunities?


They tried with Holland before the 16 season; he didn't want to sign a deal that would have paid him to rehab. He bet on himself, and it has paid off.

Before this season, he was topping out at 88-89 in his January showcase. In hindsight, we all wish they had taken the chance, but at the time, it would have been a major risk (and he was demanding a guarantee he would close).

They talked to Madson but felt better moving forward with Soria for similar money. Again, hindsight.

Perhaps the most frustrating thing about Soria is that his peripherals are still pretty good in high leverage situations.

He has limited opponents to a .339 OPS in tie games, with a 4.25:1 K:BB. That's cyborg-level.

That number jumps to .599 in late and close games, but that's still very good.

He hasn't stranded RISP consistently. His peripheral stats all suggest he should. Not much hard contact given up - only four extra base hits.

The overall standard numbers also don't add up to a guy who has blown 7 saves (even if only five are 'clean inning' blown saves.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dartgod 07-31-2017 06:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 12983141)
They tried with Holland before the 16 season; he didn't want to sign a deal that would have paid him to rehab. He bet on himself, and it has paid off.

Before this season, he was topping out at 88-89 in his January showcase. In hindsight, we all wish they had taken the chance, but at the time, it would have been a major risk (and he was demanding a guarantee he would close).

They talked to Madson but felt better moving forward with Soria for similar money. Again, hindsight.

Perhaps the most frustrating thing about Soria is that his peripherals are still pretty good in high leverage situations.

He has limited opponents to a .339 OPS in tie games, with a 4.25:1 K:BB. That's cyborg-level.

That number jumps to .599 in late and close games, but that's still very good.

He hasn't stranded RISP consistently. His peripheral stats all suggest he should. Not much hard contact given up - only four extra base hits.

The overall standard numbers also don't add up to a guy who has blown 7 saves (even if only five are 'clean inning' blown saves.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It seems like Soria tends to give up a lot of "lucky" hits, weak grounders that find holes, bloopers that fall in. You really don't see him get rocked too often.

suzzer99 07-31-2017 11:22 AM

That's also a side effect of a pitcher who doesn't strike out a lot of batters.

C3HIEF3S 07-31-2017 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 12983586)
That's also a side effect of a pitcher who doesn't strike out a lot of batters.

Soria has the highest K/9 on the team.

duncan_idaho 07-31-2017 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 12983586)
That's also a side effect of a pitcher who doesn't strike out a lot of batters.


Soria strikes out 11/9, which is a very good rate.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

suzzer99 07-31-2017 12:59 PM

Yes but it doesn't FEEL like it. It's 2017, my feelings trump your facts.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.