Trading down would be ideal. Takes a willing suitor though.

Someone said this on twitter today. Made alot of sense.


"Game is all about the QB. Get one, protect one, get to one."


We'll like it or not, we've got one who our FO thinks is pretty good. We need to either get someone to protect him, or get someone who can get to the other ones.

Eh, if you say so. I can't trust Dame's word for shit anymore.
Posted via Mobile Device

Oh, just shut the **** up.

Moeaki hasn't been lost for the season. DeVito is a far better run stuffer than Broke Dick/Never Was in Dorsey.

Robinson is not replacing Stanford Routt. LMAO

Alright, who do you think they should take outside of QB?

Says the guy that's never even muttered a coherent sentence

At this point, I don't think it would be smart to take a guy in the first round who isn't an every down player.

Speaking of a rusher, any idea why Jordan didn't participate at his pro day today?

So you think donny avery and alex smith are just gonna ****ing light it up?


you drugged out hippie, been spending too much time in randy quaid's trailer

sober up and tell me tomorrow how much donnie avery and alex smith are gonna shred the nfl, queer

Buffalo is the only team in the NFL without a starting QB. Their GM was forced to release Fitzpatrick after being punked on air earlier this week.

If they don't move up to nab a QB, the GM is likely fired after this season.

You discount a pick a round when it's for the next year, so using your logic, the appropriate calculation would be 560 + 190 (mid third rounder) 750 (about pick #23 or 24).

Even then, you're assuming that Alex Smith meets all of the conditions to turn the pick into a #2 next year. If that happens, we traded the equivalent of a late first rounder for a QB that exceeded expectations.

If he doesn't (which is what a lot of people apparently expect), then it's worth 560 + 70 (mid fourth rounder) = 630 (about pick #29 or 30).

Kind of hard to avoid since every ****ing thread is full of crying about it.

We don't play a 4-3, we likely don't even play a 1-gap 3-4, and we're talking about the first pick in the draft. For a situational pass rusher. Or, for the sake of argument, we're talking about something maybe as low as 8. And to justify that you're using JPP, who went 15, or Kiawanuka at 32, or Umenyiora at 56, or 74 for Tuck.

(Not to mention Houston at 70)

So maybe they can afford to wait on that one.

Agree completely. Ive been sitting here thinking the past three days, we are not going to be seeing this kind of spending in FA once they get past year 1 or 2 and have this team more firmly in place of where they want it.

Look, I wish it'd been lower too, but I'm getting really tired of hearing this assumption presented as fact. All you need to drive a price up is one other bidder. It's entirely possible (and even likely) that there was at least one other team up against us.

I'd still take a pass rusher over a Right Tackle any day of the week. Even with Hali/Houston.