ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Colin Kaepernick gets over $100 million new deal (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=284130)

hometeam 06-05-2014 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnV (Post 10673127)
Haha ya yall are pretty anti 49ers......i like it tho.

I don't think there are many true anti 49er fans here.

But you have to understand, we trade for some player every season. Then starts the deluge of X team fans. Ya'll jump in and start re hashing the same shit over and over again, you know nothing about the dynamic of the board, and quite frankly, no one here gives a shit about your team.

So, it just seems like that people have something against you or your team, but in reality its just apathy towards the same old shit, and a low tolerance for BS in general.

Every once in a while someone is a good poster, sticks around, and adds to the board. Your buddy Kap is a good example.

Get buff, power up, and you will be fine.


You argument still sucks.

Easy 6 06-05-2014 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 10673121)
I hope someone is collecting the DNA of Johnny Unitas, Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers and Peyton Manning.

Because we're going to have to draft the test tube baby they create from that DNA - and maybe, just maybe then - this place will respect young, talented QB's.

25-26 year old ascending players with a massive amount of potential are cut down around here because *gasp* - they may not have become HOF'ers in their 2nd or 3rd ****ing season.

Meanwhile, every near-30 slapdick QB we deal valuable picks for, this place will defend to the ****ing death, make excuses for until their fingers bleed and declare jihad on anyone that suggests said slapdick was carried by the defense for 9 games, or disappeared in the second half of a playoff game.

With, honestly, all due respect to your time here and big time money you've spent on the Chiefs... you've become jaded beyond redemption... nothing less than the next Tom ****ing Brady is going to do for you, period.

If they drafted a QB number one the next two years and neither panned out for greatness, you'd then complain about "how ****ing terrible are these guys at picking a QB? JFC!"... you don't even TRY to see the forest through the trees anymore, EVERYTHING seems to suck in your fan experience.

The Chiefs cant even wipe their asses right in your mind, if I felt as bad as you always do I swear to God I'd quit this team so fast it'd make your damn head spin.

OnTheWarpath15 06-05-2014 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 10673147)
With, honestly, all due respect to your time here and big time money you've spent on the Chiefs... you've become jaded beyond redemption... nothing less than the next Tom ****ing Brady is going to do for you, period.

If they drafted a QB number one the next two years and neither panned out for greatness, you'd then complain about "how ****ing terrible are these guys at picking a QB? JFC!"... you don't even TRY to see the forest through the trees anymore, EVERYTHING seems to suck in your fan experience.

The Chiefs cant even wipe their asses right in your mind, if I felt as bad as you always do I swear to God I'd quit this team so fast it'd make your damn head spin.

Nothing less than the next Tom Brady...

Yet I'd take Kaepernick in a ****ing heartbeat. Or Matt Stafford. Or Matt Ryan. Or Russell Wilson. Or Cam Newton.

All QB's this fanbase has gone out of their way to bash for some reason or another.

My mantra hasn't changed in the almost nine years I've been here - draft a QB early, and if you whiff, draft another one early until you hit paydirt.

I'm not the impatient one when it comes to young QB's. It's you jackholes that spend every waking moment here defending a guy who has shown 6 games of decent play (and it's not just Alex, the same folks said the same things about Cassel) while criticizing talented young QB's around the league.

If you people think Kaepernick is garbage, YOU'RE the folks that won't be pleased unless we draft the next Brady.

Quit projecting.

JohnV 06-05-2014 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hometeam (Post 10673143)
I don't think there are many true anti 49er fans here.

But you have to understand, we trade for some player every season. Then starts the deluge of X team fans. Ya'll jump in and start re hashing the same shit over and over again, you know nothing about the dynamic of the board, and quite frankly, no one here gives a shit about your team.

So, it just seems like that people have something against you or your team, but in reality its just apathy towards the same old shit, and a low tolerance for BS in general.

Every once in a while someone is a good poster, sticks around, and adds to the board. Your buddy Kap is a good example.

Get buff, power up, and you will be fine.

You argument still sucks.

You say you're not anti 49er but then you cant admit the 9ers would win the nfcc under the circumstances i gave.

I like it.

Valiant 06-05-2014 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 10670384)
I've often thought the NFL would be wise to add an additional tag for a player who is the true "franchise" player. It can only be applied one time to a player that was selected by the team in question to pretty much keep a fan favorite in his "home" city.

The trick is determining how the kid gets paid. I think a "franchise star" tag should enable a team to stick a player, such as Jamaal Charles, on the roster with a cap hit that's only the average salary for that position but the big money is paid totally from the league itself and for a set amount of money and time that applies to anyone with the "star" designation. Or, the "star" tag enables a team to pretty much write off all or most of the cap hit for the player but be negotiated with a deal from the club for however much they want to spend.

**** no. no. Hell no. Are you kidding??

jspchief 06-05-2014 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnV (Post 10673119)
Just asked a few of my buddies. One a jets fan one an eagles fan and one a bucs. They each said the 9ers would have won under the circumstances i gave. And they hate the 9ers btw.

Oh well, I guess that seals it.

OnTheWarpath15 06-05-2014 06:17 PM

LMAO

Easy 6 06-05-2014 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 10673162)
Nothing less than the next Tom Brady...

Yet I'd take Kaepernick in a ****ing heartbeat. Or Matt Stafford. Or Matt Ryan. Or Russell Wilson. Or Cam Newton.

All QB's this fanbase has gone out of their way to bash for some reason or another.

My mantra hasn't changed in the almost nine years I've been here - draft a QB early, and if you whiff, draft another one early until you hit paydirt.

I'm not the impatient one when it comes to young QB's. It's you jackholes that spend every waking moment here defending other team's trash and criticizing talented young QB's around the league.

If you people think Kaepernick is garbage, YOU'RE the folks that won't be pleased unless we draft the next Brady.

Quit projecting.

Kaep, Stafford, Ryan and Newton... I'd take Smith, in a game right now, over either of those four... you can say I'm lying because "well he's a Chief and scott free is a ****ing homer".

But you'd be dead wrong, Smith, at this point in his career, isn't going to make most of the dumb mistakes all of those guys consistently make.

"Draft a high round QB every damn year"... I've said that over and over through the years, but if you keep going One and Two with QB's every draft it just might come back to bite you... it always smart to gamble on a high stakes player here and there, but doing that consistently also neglects the rest of the team.

Yeah, its a QB driven league... but a couple of high round misses in a row is a big detriment to the team overall, as big as QB is these days they still don't play defense or run the ball etc.

And really "other teams trash" has surely applied to most QB's we've had the last ten years... but Smith isn't trash, at all, and any objective look at his last three years in the NFL makes that clear... he's an ascending player right now, even at his age, because he's been in the right systems the last few years.

Could Kaep absorb a WCO playbook as quickly as Smith did? **** no he couldn't, don't even try to say it... bottom line is that Smith isn't "trash"... the fact that some of you guys can so readily discount a NINE GAME IMPROVEMENT, no matter the NFL teams played, tells me you aren't being objective.

Its just knee jerk ****ing city around here with some of you... WE LOST IN INDY SOOO BAD ITS ALL HIS FAULT... yet we wouldn't have even SNIFFED Indy without Smith.

JohnV 06-05-2014 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hometeam (Post 10673143)
I don't think there are many true anti 49er fans here.

But you have to understand, we trade for some player every season. Then starts the deluge of X team fans. Ya'll jump in and start re hashing the same shit over and over again, you know nothing about the dynamic of the board, and quite frankly, no one here gives a shit about your team.

So, it just seems like that people have something against you or your team, but in reality its just apathy towards the same old shit, and a low tolerance for BS in general.

Every once in a while someone is a good poster, sticks around, and adds to the board. Your buddy Kap is a good example.

Get buff, power up, and you will be fine.


You argument still sucks.

Idk maybe youre not biased. If you really think russ could pull it off while lynch gained 14 yds then more power to you. Its really a stupid thing to argue over, it was only fun with that one dumbass.

Have a good night guy.

JohnV 06-05-2014 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 10673189)
Oh well, I guess that seals it.

I'll ask more people. I already know what the resounding answer will be.

Sandy Vagina 06-05-2014 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnV (Post 10673201)
I'll ask more people. I already know what the resounding answer will be.

No one here really gives a shit about Kaep. They were discussing his contract, and have already stated whether they find it worthy of his talent or not.

Beyond that, they don't want or need SF fans coming here.. desperate to talk the dude up. Believe me, I know! LMAO

You won't change opinions... so don't waste your time.

Sandy Vagina 06-05-2014 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 10673192)
Kaep, Stafford, Ryan and Newton... I'd take Smith, in a game right now, over either of those four... you can say I'm lying because "well he's a Chief and scott free is a ****ing homer".

But you'd be dead wrong, Smith, at this point in his career, isn't going to make most of the dumb mistakes all of those guys consistently make.

"Draft a high round QB every damn year"... I've said that over and over through the years, but if you keep going One and Two with QB's every draft it just might come back to bite you... it always smart to gamble on a high stakes player here and there, but doing that consistently also neglects the rest of the team.

Yeah, its a QB driven league... but a couple of high round misses in a row is a big detriment to the team overall, as big as QB is these days they still don't play defense or run the ball etc.

And really "other teams trash" has surely applied to most QB's we've had the last ten years... but Smith isn't trash, at all, and any objective look at his last three years in the NFL makes that clear... he's an ascending player right now, even at his age, because he's been in the right systems the last few years.

Could Kaep absorb a WCO playbook as quickly as Smith did? **** no he couldn't, don't even try to say it... bottom line is that Smith isn't "trash"... the fact that some of you guys can so readily discount a NINE GAME IMPROVEMENT, no matter the NFL teams played, tells me you aren't being objective.

Its just knee jerk ****ing city around here with some of you... WE LOST IN INDY SOOO BAD ITS ALL HIS FAULT... yet we wouldn't have even SNIFFED Indy without Smith.

GREAT fu**ing post!

Yeah, some folks just get bedazzled by the big-play-wow types that can run really fast and have great arm strength. Me? I like the smart and methodical QBs that may not be flashy, but handle their business... especially when the game is on the line.

New World Order 06-05-2014 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnV (Post 10673193)
Idk maybe youre not biased. If you really think russ could pull it off while lynch gained 14 yds then more power to you. Its really a stupid thing to argue over, it was only fun with that one dumbass.

Have a good night guy.



Johnv,

We don't care; now **** off.

Sincerely,

NWO

OnTheWarpath15 06-05-2014 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 10673192)
Kaep, Stafford, Ryan and Newton... I'd take Smith, in a game right now, over either of those four... you can say I'm lying because "well he's a Chief and scott free is a ****ing homer".

But you'd be dead wrong, Smith, at this point in his career, isn't going to make most of the dumb mistakes all of those guys consistently make.

Wow to the first part, and thank you for proving my point on the bolded part.

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 10673192)
"Draft a high round QB every damn year"... I've said that over and over through the years, but if you keep going One and Two with QB's every draft it just might come back to bite you... it always smart to gamble on a high stakes player here and there, but doing that consistently also neglects the rest of the team.

Yeah, its a QB driven league... but a couple of high round misses in a row is a big detriment to the team overall, as big as QB is these days they still don't play defense or run the ball etc.

Would drafting a QB and missing have been worse than drafting who we've drafted with Top 5 picks the last 5-6 years?

Nope.

You're not picking a QB every year. If you take a guy in R1, you're going to give him at least 3 years to show you something before you draft another to replace him. Your logic is faulty.

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 10673192)
And really "other teams trash" has surely applied to most QB's we've had the last ten years... but Smith isn't trash, at all, and any objective look at his last three years in the NFL makes that clear... he's an ascending player right now, even at his age, because he's been in the right systems the last few years.

Could Kaep absorb a WCO playbook as quickly as Smith did? **** no he couldn't, don't even try to say it... bottom line is that Smith isn't "trash"... the fact that some of you guys can so readily discount a NINE GAME IMPROVEMENT, no matter the NFL teams played, tells me you aren't being objective.

Its just knee jerk ****ing city around here with some of you... WE LOST IN INDY SOOO BAD ITS ALL HIS FAULT... yet we wouldn't have even SNIFFED Indy without Smith.

Wouldn't have sniffed Indy without Smith, yet we won 9 of our 11 games with him playing like a below average QB.

Seriously, just stop. You're embarrassing yourself.

Easy 6 06-05-2014 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 10673236)
GREAT fu**ing post!

Yeah, some folks just get bedazzled by the big-play-wow types that can run really fast and have great arm strength. Me? I like the smart and methodical QBs that may not be flashy, but handle their business... especially when the game is on the line.

Your last 51 games sig pretty much says it all, yet many Chiefs fans will bend over so far their heads end up in their asses trying to diminish those numbers.

And this coming from someone who'd love nothing better than to slander the guy for being a welching, greedy bitch who's reeeally pushing his luck and losing a lot of fan respect in the process... its time to SETTLE IT and get focused on 2014, Alice.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.