Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 7003902)

Yeah, I get why Hootie started the thread (and it goes deeper than your explanation and into something more pathological).

The reasons why some posters "killed the draft" was for reasons that have little to do with the win tonight. Long-term thinking vs short-term thinking.

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 7004308)

Monday Night Football Schedule for the Drafturbators (all times EST)

7:00 Turn on computer, turn on Jets game. Crack knuckles in preparation of typing in all the great things Sanchez does in the game.
7:01-10:15 Sit in silence. Post nothing in the Jets/Ravens thread.
10:16 p.m. Say a quick prayer that Cassel plays as bad as Sanchez so you can save some face.
10:20 "Cassel's first pass sucked ass".
10:21-1:15 a.m Sit in frustration as KC hangs to a lead. Occasional posts about Cassel still sucking, although having the lead takes away from some game enjoyment. Oh, if only Matt could take a sack and fumble the ball. Drat, they won.
1:16 a.m. porn search.
1:30 a.m.- 3:00 a.m. argue with Hootie that he can't just enjoy the win.

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 7004517)

I am curious as to where Dane is? He predicted Mathews would run for 170 and catch for another 50. Strange how those guys forget what they post after they are wrong.

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 7003852)

Simmah down, boy. He caught two passes. He did have one good block, but he blew another on a key third down. In short, he had the normal ups and downs of a rookie, but in no way did he play a "great" game.

Originally Posted by billay (Post 7004891)

Do you pretend to be Mecca when you jackoff?

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7004931)

**** you. I was in this thread last night and said I was wrong his numbers. Of course, I don't check the KC weather and if I had any idea it would be raining, I would have revised that prediction.

Matthews only accounted for 75 yards on the ground.

Now go **** your mother, Assclown.

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 7004937)

Who are you?

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7004931)

**** you. I was in this thread last night and said I was wrong his numbers. Of course, I don't check the KC weather and if I had any idea it would be raining, I would have revised that prediction.

Matthews only accounted for 75 yards on the ground.

Now go **** your mother, Assclown.

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7004942)

He's someone that doesn't disappear for months at a time, then show up and state a bunch of stupid shit.

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 7004938)

This thread is stupid.

That said, anyone showing up in this thread with faux-rage is reading a different board than I am. All we've heard all offseason and all week leading up to this game is how we had no chance. Any thread where people predicted a Chiefs' win or anything positive was immediately met with post after post of sarcasm and nearly every one of those threads turned out like 99% of threads on this board, with the same 4-5 people taking over the thread posting a million times repeating the same negative shit.

And, you can bet that if they Chiefs lost that game that the board would have been littered with "I told you so" threads the other way from the "realists."

Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing (Post 7004946)

So....Mathews would have had 100 more if it wasn't raining? Yeah ok.

Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing (Post 7004946)

And Matt Cassel would have thrown for 360 if it wasn't raining either...

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7004942)

He's someone that doesn't disappear for months at a time, then show up and state a bunch of stupid shit.

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7004875)

The reason they killed the draft is that they wanted short-term fixes. The biggest bitches were that a team in our position can't waste picks on luxury players. Maybe those picks weren't made because of our position. They were made because they were the most talented players on the board.

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 7004963)

That doesn't even make sense. How does wanting a 5-7 year starter equate to a short-term fix?

As for "most talented player on the board," well, it's far easier to refute that than it is to prove it. Perhaps I could be convinced that Dex and Javi were the most talented but barring that I don't accept that statement as outright fact.