ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports Big 10 Report: Conference Realignment (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227561)

Mr. Laz 06-07-2010 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike (Post 6804519)
ND needs to stop being douchy and tell B10 what their plans are, so everything can be set in motion. This stupid deadline is a freaking charade.

apparently Notre Dame is trying to squeeze some academic things out of the Big 10 to join.

Pants 06-07-2010 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6804532)
It's debatable what Texas thinks of MU or KU, but I have no doubt Notre Dame absolutely doesn't give two shits about either one of them (or any other school).

The only schools Texas cares about are the ones found in Texas.

luv 06-07-2010 01:56 PM

Big 8 would have gone under without Texas. :rolleyes:

Mojo Jojo 06-07-2010 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 6804447)
So what if Texas and it's Big12 South cohorts all jump to the Pac10 and the Big10 invites never materialize for MU/NU? What about the Big12 grabbing TCU, and one other school (who?) and getting back to being the Big8?

You get a new conference...Grab teams from Conference USA...Houston, #4 TV market...Memphis, big TV market...Tulane, the New Orleans TV market...SMU, Dallas market. All schools in the same region, and then you go find two or four others looking for bigger TV deals.

Frazod 06-07-2010 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike (Post 6804548)
The only schools Texas cares about are the ones found in Texas.

We're at least causing them bloating and discomfort.

Sure-Oz 06-07-2010 01:59 PM

Nick Wright had Dan Wetzel on and he just called him Dan Beebe twice to end the show #fail

Pitt Gorilla 06-07-2010 01:59 PM

Apparently, Kansans need to begin begging.

http://cjonline.com/sports/football/...ll_politicians

chiefsnorth 06-07-2010 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6804541)
here we go again...

once again, KU is a marginally BCS level conference type school. Meaning that they qualify to be in a BCS level conference but barely. You add a link to another school into the mix and KU isn't getting in.

1. adding another school into package deal means another split to the profit pie in which KU is barely bringing enough to begin with

2. football ... KU is a low level football program but has a top notch basketball program, with a storied history, to offset the football weakness. You add another school to that equation and it's screwed.

KU barely has enough to get into a BCS level conference
KSU isn't a BCS conference level school (financially)

add those 2 schools together and neither get in

If the Big 12 implodes then KSU is going to a mid-tier conference one way or another. The only thing is whether they drag KU down with them.

Even if KSU didnt exist, KU would not be getting into the Big 10. No football and no major media market. Basketball is nice but it's not on the same planet as football in terms of monetary value for the conference.
Posted via Mobile Device

Mr. Laz 06-07-2010 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefsnorth (Post 6804587)
Even if KSU didnt exist, KU would not be getting into the Big 10. No football and no major media market. Basketball is nice but it's not on the same planet as football in terms of monetary value for the conference.
Posted via Mobile Device

you're entitled to your opinion

ChiTown 06-07-2010 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6804541)
here we go again...

once again, KU is a marginally BCS level conference type school. Meaning that they qualify to be in a BCS level conference but barely. You add a link to another school into the mix and KU isn't getting in.

1. adding another school into package deal means another split to the profit pie in which KU is barely bringing enough to begin with

2. football ... KU is a low level football program but has a top notch basketball program, with a storied history, to offset the football weakness. You add another school to that equation and it's screwed.

KU barely has enough to get into a BCS level conference
KSU isn't a BCS conference level school

add those 2 schools together and neither get in

If the Big 12 implodes then KSU is going to a mid-tier conference one way or another. The only thing is whether they drag KU down with them.

This has NOTHING to do with basketball. ZILCH. If it even had a fracture of a hair to do anything with BBall, NU wouldn't even be in the picture. They are THE worst B12 program, and one of the worst in the NCAA history. That should tell you how much that means to the equation. It's football and TV Market, of which ku adds, again, ZILCH.

I fully recognize this, as a KSU fan, and realize we might just be ****ed. However, it's not because of ku, their lack of appeal, and your shitty football history. It's because of KSU's shitty football history and our lack of National Football appeal. We are in the in a similar boat, but KSU isn't manning this Titanic. Your football program (or lack thereof) and lack of a TV market have steered you into this iceberg in the same way KSU will hit that same iceberg.

And laugh out loud at your KSU isn't a BCS conference level school comment. Again, this is football related, not basketball. Therefore, your suck is = to our suck:D

KChiefs1 06-07-2010 02:07 PM

http://www.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/e...70202/22395511

Quote:

The latest scuttlebutt Monday morning has to do with Syracuse being the key to prying Notre Dame loose for the Big Ten.

If Missouri and Nebraska say yes to the Big Ten, I'm hearing that then either Pittsburgh or Rutgers would be paired with Syracuse to form an expanded eastern boundary of the new league. The key, apparently, is taking The 'Cuse into the Big Ten. The fit already looks good. Syracuse chancellor Nancy Cantor is a former chancellor at Illinois and provost at Michigan.

In this scenario, the addition of Syracuse collapses the Big East and potentially forces Notre Dame to find a conference home for its minor sports. Not to mention a conference home for football.

In other words, Notre Dame needs a compelling reason to join a league in football. I reported yesterday that if Notre Dame came to the Big Ten, that league's expansion might be capped at 12. That might not be the case now. The two biggest words to remember in this entire process is that it is always a "fluid situation."

Adding to the intrigue is that Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany said Sunday that expansion could happen in stages.

If all of the above comes to pass, we'd be looking at two 16-team leagues (Pac-10, Big Ten), the collapse of the Big 12 and Big East and a whole lot of chaos.

Does the SEC react?

DeezNutz 06-07-2010 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 6804568)
Apparently, Kansans need to begin begging.

http://cjonline.com/sports/football/...ll_politicians

"...just keep the baby out of the street!"/Boys in the Hood

Mr. Laz 06-07-2010 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 6804594)
This has NOTHING to do with basketball. ZILCH. If it even had a fracture of a hair to do anything with BBall, NU wouldn't even be in the picture. They are THE worst B12 program, and one of the worst in the NCAA history. That should tell you how much that means to the equation. It's football and TV Market, of which ku adds, again, ZILCH.

I fully recognize this, as a KSU fan, and realize we might just be ****ed. However, it's not because of ku, their lack of appeal, and your shitty football history. It's because of KSU's shitty football history and our lack of National Football appeal. We are in the in a similar boat, but KSU isn't manning this Titanic. Your football program (or lack thereof) and lack of a TV market have steered you into this iceberg in the same way KSU will hit that same iceberg.

And laugh out loud at your KSU isn't a BCS conference level school comment. Again, this is football related, not basketball. Therefore, your suck is = to our suck:D

whatever ...

KU is a Nationally relevant Basketball program ... top 5 all-time. It brings national exposure to the NCAA tourney.

Basketball IS relevant financially ... just not as much as football.

Besides ... KU does have a decent football program. It's been better than KSU in recent years.

Academically KU is also a solid school

KU's television market doesn't suck ... it's just not great

KU is marginally qualified in just about every category but not enough to have any other "issues" and still make it.

laugh all you want but if the Big 12 really does implode KSU is mid conference bound ... period. KU has an outside shot if they can get the board of regents to split KU/KSU.

Bambi 06-07-2010 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6804619)
whatever ...

KU is a Nationally relevant Basketball program ... top 5 all-time. It brings national exposure to the NCAA tourney.

Basketball IS relevant financially ... just not as much as football.

Besides ... KU does have a decent football program. It's been better than KSU in recent years.

Academically KU is also a solid school

KU's television market doesn't suck ... it's just not great

KU is marginally qualified in just about every category but not enough to have any other "issues" and still make it.

laugh all you want but if the Big 12 really does implode KSU is mid conference bound ... period. KU has an outside shot if they can get the board of regents to split KU/KSU.


It's not like KU has this "zilch TV market" like all you keep saying.

Kansas City is 31st. Not great but far from nothing.

KU dominates the Kansas City market.

Titty Meat 06-07-2010 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6804619)
whatever ...

KU is a Nationally relevant Basketball program ... top 5 all-time. It brings national exposure to the NCAA tourney.

Basketball IS relevant financially ... just not as much as football.

Besides ... KU does have a decent football program. It's been better than KSU in recent years.

Academically KU is also a solid school

KU's television market doesn't suck ... it's just not great

KU is marginally qualified in just about every category but not enough to have any other "issues" and still make it.

laugh all you want but if the Big 12 really does implode KSU is mid conference bound ... period. KU has an outside shot if they can get the board of regents to split KU/KSU.

KU sucks cawk nobody cares about KU outside of Kansas.

chiefsnorth 06-07-2010 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6804619)
whatever ...

KU is a Nationally relevant Basketball program ... top 5 all-time. It brings national exposure to the NCAA tourney.

Basketball IS relevant financially ... just not as much as football.

Besides ... KU does have a decent football program. It's been better than KSU in recent years.

Academically KU is also a solid school

KU's television market doesn't suck ... it's just not great

KU is marginally qualified in just about every category but not enough to have any other "issues" and still make it.

KU does not have a football program that would be a credit to a major conference. They had one run break up decades of futility and now are back to the doldrums. It was a nice Cinderella story but no one is going to mistake that program for a major conf. caliber program. The already have bottom feeders like Michigan State and Indiana, Illinois, etc.

This is about football and football, and also football.
Posted via Mobile Device

ChiTown 06-07-2010 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6804619)
whatever ...

KU is a Nationally relevant Basketball program ... top 5 all-time. It brings national exposure to the NCAA tourney.

Basketball IS relevant financially ... just not as much as football.

Besides ... KU does have a decent football program. It's been better than KSU in recent years.

Academically KU is also a solid school

KU's television market doesn't suck ... it's just not great

KU is marginally qualified in just about every category but not enough to have any other "issues" and still make it.

Your Football Program compared to KSU's? ROFL I'm sure that makes you sleep better at night.

Since we are talking about football here, and relevance, how about KU's B12 Conference Championships, or even your ability to get to a North Title game?:evil:

On a separate note, wasn't the KSU-KU basketball game in Manhattan ESPN's most watched TV game this year? I don't have a link, but thought I had heard that.

luv 06-07-2010 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6804645)
It's not like KU has this "zilch TV market" like all you keep saying.

Kansas City is 31st. Not great but far from nothing.

KU dominates the Kansas City market.

Still splits it, though.

Titty Meat 06-07-2010 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 6804652)
Your Football Program compared to KSU's? ROFL I'm sure that makes you sleep better at night.

Since we are talking about football here, and relevance, how about KU's B12 Conference Championships, or even your ability to get to a North Title game?:evil:

On a separate note, wasn't the KSU-KU basketball game in Manhattan ESPN's most watched TV game this year? I don't have a link, but thought I had heard that.

Shit I thought you were a KU fan all this time.

ChiTown 06-07-2010 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6804645)
It's not like KU has this "zilch TV market" like all you keep saying.

Kansas City is 31st. Not great but far from nothing.

KU dominates the Kansas City market.

Define dominates? There are 3 college teams that are closely followed in the KC market, and maybe even a 4th (with NU). I think you are bastardizing the term "dominates".

ChiTown 06-07-2010 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6804661)
Shit I thought you were a KU fan all this time.

:Lin:

Frazod 06-07-2010 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6804645)
It's not like KU has this "zilch TV market" like all you keep saying.

Kansas City is 31st. Not great but far from nothing.

KU dominates the Kansas City market.

LMAO

Dominate? Please.

vailpass 06-07-2010 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6804436)
I don't. If we had to live through the bullshit that is the Big XII to end up in the Big 10 on the other side, it's been an extremely productive 15 or so years.

No doubt athletic $$ and TV viewership are primarily driving this thing, but don't look past the academic benefits.

There is the part that is not being talked about in the short term but will pay off as many if not more benefits as the athletics to the schools joining the B10. Props for seeing beyond the obvious.

vailpass 06-07-2010 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6804547)
apparently Notre Dame is trying to squeeze some academic things out of the Big 10 to join.

Have you read any specifics as to what that might be?

Titty Meat 06-07-2010 02:27 PM

The residents of Lincoln voted to pass a new basketball arena. This probably played a part for any future football national championship celebrations at Nebraska.

KChiefs1 06-07-2010 02:31 PM

http://www.denverpost.com/sportsnews...809?source=rss

Quote:

The day University of Colorado athletic director Mike Bohn allows a bunch of loud-mouthed, money-grubbing Texans to dictate how the Buffaloes run their business is also the day he should be fired.

Let me get this straight: During stressful economic times when Colorado families endure a 9 percent tuition hike to enroll their kids on the Boulder campus, Bohn really wants a ticket on a jet plane to fly off and play football in a conference spread from Seattle to Los Angeles to Lubbock, Texas?

That would pretty near be the dumbest move Bohn has made since allowing Dan Hawkins to name his son as starting quarterback of the Buffaloes.

At a juncture when college sports threaten to spin out of control, Colorado needs to get a grip.

The Buffaloes have no business in the Pac-10 Conference, especially if the league expands to 16 teams, and the nearest rival to CU would be located nearly 600 miles down the road from Folsom Field.

There's a whole lot of pimping in college sports these days, as conferences flirt with realignment. The same educators who decry the evils of a football playoff now peddle their student-athletes like pieces of meat.

Hate to be the one to break it to you, Buffaloes. But you don't have the chips to be a major player in this high-stakes game.

The University of Texas is calling the shots as conferences nationwide greedily chase the beaucoup bucks to be pocketed from football television rights.

With no shame, it seems every league lustily dreams of hooking up with the Longhorns. The Big Ten. The Pac-10. What's the next rumor? Texas to replace Jacksonville in the AFC South?

But following Texas, whose $125 million athletic budget is more than twice what CU can afford to spend on sports, anywhere in this new college landscape would be a fool's errand for the Buffs.

Why?

If you're constantly chasing the Longhorns' tail, the view never changes. And it stinks.

There's no denying the Big 12 Conference, where the Buffs now reside, faces a crisis. But the league has been in trouble since 1994, when the Cornhuskers, Sooners and friends sold their souls to four teams from Texas. Well, the bill to pay the devil is due. Shouldn't we all have seen this day of reckoning coming?


As Nebraska football legend Tom Osborne so accurately noted, the center of gravity in the league has slowly moved south. Want to ruin something good?

Texas fry it.

You think the Longhorns really give a hoot about Big 12 tradition, much less the prosperity of Kansas State or Iowa State?

No wonder Missouri wants out, anxiously waiting for an invitation from the Big Ten.

The Buffaloes could use some creative thinking. So here's one modest proposal: What if Bohn shopped CU to the Mountain West with the idea of becoming a 12-team league eligible for a conference championship game in football?

As early as this week, the Mountain West could extend an invitation to Boise State as its 10th member. Add the Broncos, who finished No. 4 in the final polls last season, to a football roster that already includes Texas Christian, Brigham Young and Utah, then you have teams with BCS muscle to flex against almost any league in the country.

By joining the Mountain West, CU would enhance rivalries with Colorado State, Air Force and Wyoming, an idea which makes marketing sense, to say nothing of more sensible travel than the Buffs hitching a ride to Waco.

Make it an even dozen teams in the Mountain West by signing up Houston and its TV market to bundle with Denver, Dallas, San Diego and Salt Lake City. If you dare to dream even bigger, go to 14 teams, grabbing Kansas and Kansas State when the Big 12 implodes.

Sound a little crazy?

Sure.

But in this age of unholy alliances, Bohn needs a bold plan that gives CU more than a prayer of keeping the budget in line while winning championships.

The Buffaloes don't need to roam all the way to an expanded Pac-10, begging for a handout in exchange for being the road kill of Southern Cal or Texas.

Now is the time when a university athletic department must reveal if it is about anything more than chasing a buck.

Make a stand, CU.

Here, in the Rocky Mountains.

That's home.


Mark Kiszla: 303-954-1053 or mkiszla@denverpost.com

Mojo Jojo 06-07-2010 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6804619)
whatever ...

KU is a Nationally relevant Basketball program ... top 5 all-time. It brings national exposure to the NCAA tourney.

Basketball IS relevant financially ... just not as much as football.

Besides ... KU does have a decent football program. It's been better than KSU in recent years.

Academically KU is also a solid school

KU's television market doesn't suck ... it's just not great

KU is marginally qualified in just about every category but not enough to have any other "issues" and still make it.

laugh all you want but if the Big 12 really does implode KSU is mid conference bound ... period. KU has an outside shot if they can get the board of regents to split KU/KSU.

Wow...you just don't understand life.
KU has no real TV market.
NU gives visiting teams more money from a football game than KU would make.
Academics...KSU has more Rhodes and Truman Scholars than KU.

This is set up just like the state of Michigan.

Mr. Laz 06-07-2010 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 6804652)
Your Football Program compared to KSU's? ROFL I'm sure that makes you sleep better at night.

Since we are talking about football here, and relevance, how about KU's B12 Conference Championships, or even your ability to get to a North Title game?:evil:

On a separate note, wasn't the KSU-KU basketball game in Manhattan ESPN's most watched TV game this year? I don't have a link, but thought I had heard that.

i said the "in recent years" for football ... but i suppose with KSU the ability to read is suspect.

KSU football has sucked since Bill Snyder left and didn't stop sucking until Bill Snyder returned.

joke all you want ... truth is truth

basketball KU > KSU
t.v. market KU > KSU
academically KU > KSU
football KU = KSU (not historically, but right now. Yes, KSU seems to be trending up and KU seems to be trending down)

for a BCS conference, KU is a crown jewel in Basketball and middle of the road school to beat upon in football. Middle ground t.v. market and solid academically.

in Bill Snyders prime he brought KSU to the BCS level in football but beyond that KSU just doesn't make it to a BCS level in anything.

Pants 06-07-2010 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefsnorth (Post 6804647)
KU does not have a football program that would be a credit to a major conference. They had one run break up decades of futility and now are back to the doldrums. It was a nice Cinderella story but no one is going to mistake that program for a major conf. caliber program. The already have bottom feeders like Michigan State and Indiana, Illinois, etc.

This is about football and football, and also football.
Posted via Mobile Device

Umm, it's about football and TV sets. As long as you have either or, you're invited.

Titty Meat 06-07-2010 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6804715)
i said the "in recent years" for football ... but i suppose with KSU the ability to read is suspect.

KSU football has sucked since Bill Snyder left and didn't stop sucking until Bill Snyder returned.

joke all you want ... truth is truth

basketball KU > KSU
t.v. market KU > KSU
academically KU > KSU
football KU = KSU (not historically, but right now. Yes, KSU seems to be trending up and KU seems to be trending down)

for a BCS conference, KU is a crown jewel in Basketball and middle of the road school to beat upon in football. Middle ground t.v. market and solid academically.

in Bill Snyders prime he brought KSU to the BCS level in football but beyond that KSU just doesn't make it to a BCS level in anything.

Didn't Kstates basketball team make it further then Ku's? Mizzou has gone further the last few years as well. You think anyone outside of Kansas remembers KU's title or do they remember them losing to Bucknell, Bradley, and Northern Iowa?

Sure-Oz 06-07-2010 02:40 PM

KU Chancellor urges Nebraska to stay

vailpass 06-07-2010 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 6804695)

There isn't anything in that article I could argue with.

Bambi 06-07-2010 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6804646)
KU sucks cawk nobody cares about KU outside of Kansas.

So naive...

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jtqZrTorl3w&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jtqZrTorl3w&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

Titty Meat 06-07-2010 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6804745)
So naive...

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jtqZrTorl3w&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jtqZrTorl3w&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

Thats why all the big confrences haven't invited Kansas.

ChiTown 06-07-2010 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6804715)
i said the "in recent years" for football ... but i suppose with KSU the ability to read is suspect.

KSU football has sucked since Bill Snyder left and didn't stop sucking until Bill Snyder returned.

joke all you want ... truth is truth

basketball KU > KSU
t.v. market KU > KSU
academically KU > KSU
football KU = KSU (not historically, but right now. Yes, KSU seems to be trending up and KU seems to be trending down)

for a BCS conference, KU is a crown jewel in Basketball and middle of the road school to beat upon in football. Middle ground t.v. market and solid academically.

in Bill Snyders prime he brought KSU to the BCS level in football but beyond that KSU just doesn't make it to a BCS level in anything.

Look, I can't maintain this discussion with you if you can't divorce yourself of this notion that basketball matters in this equation. If you can, then:

TV Market: Equal
Academically: KU, but ONLY because you have a Law School and Med School - beyond that, there is NOTHING superior about your academic status compared to KSU's relative to the individual Colleges themselves. When you want a top of the line Engineer, Architect or Bus grad, you go to KSU over KU. When you want a philanthropic Liberal Arts blowhard, you go to larryville:D
Football: We've had more recent success, but I'd say historically equal.

Nobody gives two shits about KU Football other than KU fans. Deal with it.

DeezNutz 06-07-2010 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6804724)
KU Chancellor urges Nebraska to stay

Really?

Pants 06-07-2010 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6804748)
Thats why all the big confrences haven't invited Kansas.

billay, you should hush, adults are talking. This is a little above your level of understanding.

Bambi 06-07-2010 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6804723)
Didn't Kstates basketball team make it further then Ku's? Mizzou has gone further the last few years as well. You think anyone outside of Kansas remembers KU's title or do they remember them losing to Bucknell, Bradley, and Northern Iowa?

Made it further the last few years?

Well, except for no final fours and no titles ever I guess your correct.

Don't worry, one day you'll get that tourney win.

Mr. Laz 06-07-2010 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mojo Jojo (Post 6804696)
Wow...you just don't understand life.
KU has no real TV market.
NU gives visiting teams more money from a football game than KU would make.
Academics...KSU has more Rhodes and Truman Scholars than KU.

This is set up just like the state of Michigan.

academic ranking of National Public Universities

------------ CCAP, NSNWR
Mizzou Univ - 13, 42
colorado uni - 19,35
ohio state --- 20, 19
Kansas Univ - 22, 38
Oklahoma U - 27, 52
Kansas state - 55, 62
Nebraska ----- 62, 42

http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2008/0519/030_4.html

Bambi 06-07-2010 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6804748)
Thats why all the big confrences haven't invited Kansas.

I've never seen anyone on either coast with a Nebraska shirt on.

Maybe a fat tourist but no regular people. At least not since 1994.

vailpass 06-07-2010 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6804757)
I've never seen anyone on either coast with a Nebraska shirt on.

Maybe a fat tourist but no regular people. At least not since 1994.

I have. There is a radio station in Phoenix that broadcasts the Husker football games every Saturday.
Nebraska's football program has 100x the national presence of anything out of KS or MO.
When it comes to alma mater smack you should probably stick to either basketball or basketball or maybe basketball because you have absolutely nothing else.

Pants 06-07-2010 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6804776)
I have. There is a radio station in Phoenix that broadcasts the Husker football games every Saturday.
Nebraska's football program has 100x the national presence of anything out of KS or MO.
When it comes to alma mater smack you should probably stick to either basketball or basketball or maybe basketball because you have absolutely nothing else.

Still better than Iowa, brah. Wait, you guys have wrestling just like MU, right?

Bambi 06-07-2010 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6804776)
I have. There is a radio station in Phoenix that broadcasts the Husker football games every Saturday.
Nebraska's football program has 100x the national presence of anything out of KS or MO.
When it comes to alma mater smack you should probably stick to either basketball or basketball or maybe basketball because you have absolutely nothing else.

Well yea I guess they have more of a presence than Iowa.

chiefsnorth 06-07-2010 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike (Post 6804779)
Still better than Iowa, brah. Wait, you guys have wrestling just like MU, right?

Iowa's football program brings more money in to the University and conference than KU's basketball program I bet. Just thinking.
Posted via Mobile Device

vailpass 06-07-2010 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike (Post 6804779)
Still better than Iowa, brah. Wait, you guys have wrestling just like MU, right?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6804782)
Well yea I guess they have more of a presence than Iowa.

:D KU butthurting today.

Pants 06-07-2010 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefsnorth (Post 6804784)
Iowa's football program brings more money in to the University and conference than KU's basketball program I bet. Just thinking.
Posted via Mobile Device

Huh? What does that have to do with anything?

ChiTown 06-07-2010 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefsnorth (Post 6804784)
Iowa's football program brings more money in to the University and conference than KU's basketball program I bet. Just thinking.
Posted via Mobile Device

Just so I have this straight, what college team do you follow?

Pants 06-07-2010 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6804787)
WTF are you talking about?

I thought we were discussing national presence?

KChiefs1 06-07-2010 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike (Post 6804779)
Still better than Iowa, brah. Wait, you guys have wrestling just like MU, right?

Iowa football is an event in Iowa City.

vailpass 06-07-2010 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike (Post 6804792)
I thought we were discussing national presence?

You saying KU has a bigger national football presence than Iowa? Or anyone for that matter?

KChiefs1 06-07-2010 03:07 PM

Missouri has more in common with Iowa than Kansas has with Iowa.
That's one of the reasons of manyfor why Mizzou is a better fit for the Big Ten.

Frazod 06-07-2010 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6804798)
You saying KU has a bigger national football presence than Iowa? Or anyone for that matter?

Listen to the man. He's been on the Iowa bandwagon for six whole months now.

WilliamTheIrish 06-07-2010 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy (Post 6804129)

"That f'ing Kietzman!!!"... oh wait.

Pants 06-07-2010 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6804798)
You saying KU has a bigger national football presence than Iowa? Or anyone for that matter?

Are you reeruned or just pretending? Iowa has no national presence in anything. KU has national presence in basketball. And even though BB doesn't matter when compared to football, it's still better than NOTHING. Hope that helped.

kepp 06-07-2010 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6804715)
i said the "in recent years" for football ... but i suppose with KSU the ability to read is suspect.

Don't you mean "in recent year"?

vailpass 06-07-2010 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike (Post 6804818)
Are you reeruned or just pretending? Iowa has no national presence in anything. KU has national presence in basketball. And even though BB doesn't matter when compared to football, it's still better than NOTHING. Hope that helped.

Just becasue your school has no football program is no reason to be ignorant of college football in general. I get that recent events have made KU fan a little bitter but come on, you really don't know anything about Iowa football?

Bambi 06-07-2010 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike (Post 6804818)
Are you reeruned or just pretending? Iowa has no national presence in anything. KU has national presence in basketball. And even though BB doesn't matter when compared to football, it's still better than NOTHING. Hope that helped.

lol

Pablo 06-07-2010 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6804823)
Just becasue your school has no football program is no reason to be ignorant of college football in general. I get that recent events have made KU fan a little bitter but come on, you really don't know anything about Iowa football?

Nobody outside of Iowa knows anything about Iowa football.

Pants 06-07-2010 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6804823)
Just becasue your school has no football program is no reason to be ignorant of college football in general. I get that recent events have made KU fan a little bitter but come on, you really don't know anything about Iowa football?

I know you won the last Orange Bowl, that's about it. There are only a few national powerhouses in football and Iowa is not one of them. There are only a few national powerhouses in basketball and KU is one of them.

chiefsnorth 06-07-2010 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike (Post 6804818)
Are you reeruned or just pretending? Iowa has no national presence in anything. KU has national presence in basketball. And even though BB doesn't matter when compared to football, it's still better than NOTHING. Hope that helped.

what are you talking about? they have ended the season ranked 5 out of the last 10 years. they won a BCS bowl last year - the same one KU fans are so fond of crowing about. They are 5-3 in bowl games in the last decade. And, most media have them around #10 preseason for 2010.

This is hilaritarded, and I have no affiliation or affinity for Iowa.
Posted via Mobile Device

kepp 06-07-2010 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike (Post 6804829)
I know you won the last Orange Bowl, that's about it.

Isn't this the same argument you make for ku football?

vailpass 06-07-2010 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike (Post 6804829)
I know you won the last Orange Bowl, that's about it. There are only a few national powerhouses in football and Iowa is not one of them. There are only a few national powerhouses in basketball and KU is one of them.

ROFL KU guy is sad and getting sadder. This whole nobody-wants-us thing is really getting to some of you.

Alright, I'll not argue with the redheaded step children any longer.

WilliamTheIrish 06-07-2010 03:22 PM

Quote:

This is hilaritarded,...
Thread over/

Bambi 06-07-2010 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6804823)
Just becasue your school has no football program is no reason to be ignorant of college football in general. I get that recent events have made KU fan a little bitter but come on, you really don't know anything about Iowa football?

I know you guys got Christian Ballard from Lawrence Free State!

He's good

vailpass 06-07-2010 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 6804832)
Isn't this the same argument you make for ku football?

Leave them alone man, they are apparently in deep state of butthurt.

Pants 06-07-2010 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 6804832)
Isn't this the same argument you make for ku football?

I make no arguments for KU football. The only times I bring up the Orange Bowl is when I'm discussing our relative schools' successes. I have no illusions about KU's national standing in football.

OnTheWarpath15 06-07-2010 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6804142)
I see a quote form source that appears to be a personal blog that says ND is paid $9 million/year by NBC. Where does the rest of the $28 million come from?

Speculation on the part of a professor does not equal a credible source.

How am I supposed to know?

You asked where I got the numbers. There they are.

And FWIW, if you want to classify the claims of a man who's been involved in TV negotiations with NBC in the past, and says the reported number is low, be my guest.

I don't see a reason not to take his word for it. He's been closer to it than anyone who ever written anything on the subject.

Hell, here's a quote that says NBC pays ND $15M:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/11/sp...1sandomir.html

Quote:

NBC is paying about $15 million a year in the current deal, enough to help fund most of the reported $18 million Notre Dame must pay to buy out Weis’s contract.
Id the New York Times a legit enough source for you?

Frazod 06-07-2010 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6804835)
ROFL KU guy is sad and getting sadder. This whole nobody-wants-us thing is really getting to some of you.

Alright, I'll not argue with the redheaded step children any longer.

Hey fanboy, if Iowa goes back in the toilet, will you revert to being a full time Bronco troll again?

vailpass 06-07-2010 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6804844)
Hey fanboy, if Iowa goes back in the toilet, will you revert to being a full time Bronco troll again?

Shouldn't you be concentrating on getting tantric so you don't throw up while banging your fat chicks?

Pants 06-07-2010 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6804835)
ROFL KU guy is sad and getting sadder. This whole nobody-wants-us thing is really getting to some of you.

Alright, I'll not argue with the redheaded step children any longer.

You either haven't read any of my posts or you're just saying this because you have no logical come back from what I said. Or both. You can laugh all you want, I'm not bitter or jaded about any of this, I realize money rules the world and I understand the reasons behind B10 extending (or about to extend) invites to MU and Nebraska. I won't let you make reeruned statements without calling you out, however.

vailpass 06-07-2010 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6804843)
How am I supposed to know?

You asked where I got the numbers. There they are.

And FWIW, if you want to classify the claims of a man who's been involved in TV negotiations with NBC in the past, and says the reported number is low, be my guest.

I don't see a reason not to take his word for it. He's been closer to it than anyone who ever written anything on the subject.

Hell, here's a quote that says NBC pays ND $15M:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/11/sp...1sandomir.html



Id the New York Times a legit enough source for you?

One source you quote says $9million, one says $15 million, somehow somewhere you came up with a figure for $28 million.
Which is it?
http://citationmachine.net/

vailpass 06-07-2010 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike (Post 6804851)
You either haven't read any of my posts or you're just saying this because you have no logical come back from what I said. Or both. You can laugh all you want, I'm not bitter or jaded about any of this, I realize money rules the world and I understand the reasons behind B10 extending (or about to extend) invites to MU and Nebraska. I won't let you make reeruned statements without calling you out, however.

Sure.

OnTheWarpath15 06-07-2010 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6804318)
Espn OTL

"The Big 10 is only talking to Notre Dame right now and will wait for an answer from them before moving on to MU/Neb"

"Law makers in Texas are moving to force Baylor link to Texas in any move"

Then they'll be waiting a while, IMO.

I'm with DeArmond on this one. The ONLY way Notre Dame goes anywhere is if it's to a super-conference. They aren't going alone.

luv 06-07-2010 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6804845)
Shouldn't you be concnetrating on getting tantric so you don't throw up while banging your fat chicks?

I think you and badgirl should hook up. You're both obsessed with fat people.

ChiTown 06-07-2010 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv (Post 6804858)
I think you and badgirl should hook up. You're both obsessed with fat people.

pot, kettle and black

luv 06-07-2010 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 6804862)
pot, kettle and black

:spock: I've never called anyone out for being fat.

Pablo 06-07-2010 03:32 PM

I guess playing second fiddle to OSU and Michigan for, well forever and then having recent success makes you a national brand. I don't know shit about Iowa's history, well because they're Iowa.

ChiTown 06-07-2010 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv (Post 6804863)
:spock: I've never called anyone out for being fat.

Re-read what I bolded.

You jump in on EVERY conversation that says something about fat, or a fat girl. It's like a bulletin board pheromone for you.

WilliamTheIrish 06-07-2010 03:34 PM

Quote:

...If the Big 12 implodes then KSU is going to a mid-tier conference one way or another. The only thing is whether they drag KU down with them....
I want it known right here and now, that I'm proud to be the anchor attached to the neck of KU fans as they slide briskly into the icy waters, thrashing for air, attempting to loosen the purple chains and cinderblocks that bind them, until one final gasp for air results in lungs full of water and death takes hold.

I had no idea the sway that KSU holds over their little brother. Complete and total ownership.

Let the epitaph read:

KU, we hardly <strike>knew ye</strike> cared.

Frazod 06-07-2010 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6804845)
Shouldn't you be concentrating on getting tantric so you don't throw up while banging your fat chicks?

No, seriously, pussy, what happens if both your teams go to hell at the same time? For years all we heard about was Denver, but then they take a dive and all of a sudden you're Mr. Iowa! I realize that as a gutless, pathetic internet troll, you apparently need to feel that you assert some sort of superiority over all us people that you'll never summon the courage to meet, so I just wonder what the next phase will be. This MY ORANGE BOWL IS BETTER THAN YOUR ORANGE BOWL!!! thing is rather amusing. LMAO What's next? Perhaps you'll suddenly reveal that you've always been a life-long Yankees fan!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.