Quote:
Originally Posted by Frosty
(Post 8548691)
Dude, please. Everyone knows that the oil companies bought up all the patents for the alternative fuels and other oil saving science.
:tinfoil:
:Peace:
|
Actually, not that far-fetched of an idea.
BP-Dupont takes Gevo to court.
Patent encumbrance of large automotive NiMH batteries.
In terms of alternative fuel sources -- as of right now, none will be as economically efficient as oil.
That is, until we actually invest time and money into perfecting the methods in which we use them. Oil has not always been this efficient , it took years and years and years of work, technology, etc.
The same is and will be true for what we decide to use next.
Solar energy is the most powerful, yet we need to work on ways of capturing and maintaining that energy for longer periods.
Hydrogen is another fantastic alternative and we've seen a number of companies work on improving this technology.
The possibilities with wind might not be the greatest, but it's something we should at least explore.
Natural gas is another alternative that has yet to be explored fully.
More money should be invested into biofuels as well.
We shouldn't rely solely on one energy source -- we should explore every option and utilize every option possible to maintain cost efficiency.
The point is that complaining about gas prices being too high, yet doing absolutely nothing to explore other options is senseless.
At what point do we reach a cost that is simply too much? At what point do we say that gasoline is no longer affordable? At what point do we say that oil simpy cannot reach global demand due to the limited amount left?
We should be proactive rather than reactive.