Sounds good to me.

Did the mods consider just placing him on universal ignore and not tell him? He could ramble all day long and no one would see it.

Wtf lol

He's the worst type to try that with. Universal iggy screwed up the paging in our software, so someone who posts a ton would make it really tough on everyone else.

Honestly, I don't think I've ever read any of his posts until everyone started quoting him and arguing with him. If someone is in the red in rep I scroll right past it till I get to a green poster.

Isnt this what ignore is for? I don't know the guy, but just my 2 cents.

He would have known he was on UI 23 seconds after he posted something and didn't have 14 people telling him he was an idiot.

This! :clap:

The only guy I know that answers that description is Tom-Cash. And I can almost swear Rambozo is not him. I mean he's recently given me a positive rep on a post. That CANNOT happen wit TC.

I'm late to this party, but I'm amazed that we might actually have a group consensus to ban someone who hasn't technically broken any rules. Usually people are pretty tolerant, so it says a lot that BlackBob has annoyed people enough to warrant this.

It's probably been said in the thread, but he's never had "mults" per se - he just comes back after we ban him. Sometimes we notice and kill it early, and sometimes he sticks around long enough that we let him stay for a bit.

As for why we haven't just called him an official "permaban" and not let him back at all, it's mostly because even the original ban was just because he was obnoxious. We made an exception because we were all universally annoyed by him, but it's tough to justify that long-term when the poster isn't really doing anything "against the rules."

Sorry for the rant. TL;DR - **** him.

That's what he said

NTTAWWT


:evil:

This poll isn't just for us. It's also for him. It demonstrates loud and clear that he's not wanted here. Sometimes there are reasons for my unorthodox methods that I don't particularly want to divulge out on the open forum. We're not always going to use the very same tactic each time we scrub this site of somebody. It depends on the personalities, their persistence, and technical where-with-all among other things.

You're a ****ing genius.

I don't know about anyone else but I cannot wait to read your football takes.

So, has Luv showed up to defend him yet?

http://blogs.amctv.com/movie-blog/fe...ripley-560.jpg

I have no idea what the **** is being discussed in here, but I voted __.

Luckily, people take a far different approach when casting ballots in "real life."