ChiefsPlanet
Page 24 of 45 « First 1420212223 24 2526272834 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs To the drafturbators... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=233408)

Marcellus 09-14-2010 11:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 7005031)
And while we're at it, who are the "Drafturbators" who said that the Chiefs had no chance to win?
Dane for 1.

I am paraphrasing but he said "Why won't the Chargers win by 30".

chiefsnorth 09-14-2010 11:47 AM
Pioli, Haley, et al.'s detractors here are so violent and vitriolic in the expression of their opposition to the front office that it should be no surprise that the more optimistic will use this opportunity to give some back.

Reaper16 09-14-2010 11:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7005033)
I think we agree here. I'm acting on the assumption that the FO didn't like Clausen or Cody as players. To draft them just because we need a QB and NT would have been short-term thinking.

My dream draft would have been Berry, Cody, Clausen for the reasons you mentioned. If the FO don't like them, they made decisions in the best long-term interest of the team.
Its hard for me to fault them for adding that kind of speed. Those rookies were as good as I've ever seen a draft class be right out of the gate. What did we have, something like 6 players with a real impact in that game?
Yeah, it seems pretty clear that the front office didn't like Clausen or Cody (or Linval Jospeh or Torell Troup). Because you have to think that the front office recognized a deficit in the NT position at least (I can understand for political reasons why a QB wouldn't be considered).

Marcellus 09-14-2010 11:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefsnorth (Post 7005047)
Pioli, Haley, et al.'s detractors here are so violent and vitriolic in the expression of their opposition to the front office that it should be no surprise that the more optimistic will use this opportunity to give some back.
Rep. That pretty much sums up CP's vibe.

Marcellus 09-14-2010 11:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 7005050)
Yeah, it seems pretty clear that the front office didn't like Clausen or Cody (or Linval Jospeh or Torell Troup). Because you have to think that the front office recognized a deficit in the NT position at least (I can understand for political reasons why a QB wouldn't be considered).
Depends on how Smith works out. He had a good game.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2010 11:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 7005038)
Dane for 1.

I am paraphrasing but he said "Why won't the Chargers win by 30".
Yeah, I didn't think they had a chance to win. I was wrong. BFD.

But I guess that counts as Federal Holiday in the minds of some, so be it.

So, who are these "Drafturbators" that thought the Chiefs had a shitty draft?

Reaper16 09-14-2010 11:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7005036)
I won $1500 imaginary dollars in the gambling challenge thread by betting on the Chiefs.
Just yesterday morning the two of us were discussing how we thought KC had a legit chance at winning because of the likelihood of a fired-up defense in the MNF atmosphere limiting Ryan Matthews' effectiveness. That's pretty much what happened. And we're part of that camp they call the "Drafturbators."

Marcellus 09-14-2010 11:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7005057)
Yeah, I didn't think they had a chance to win. I was wrong. BFD.

But I guess that counts as Federal Holiday in the minds of some, so be it.

So, who are these "Drafturbators" that thought the Chiefs had a shitty draft?
You are wrong more than you will admit. If you weren't so ****ing confident in every single opinion you have it wouldn't be as big of a deal or as fun to point out when you are wrong.:D

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 7005035)
Seriously? After the Berry pick almost everything was questioned except Asamoah.

-King- 09-14-2010 11:56 AM
I give Dane his credit. He did like the draft from the get go. He said it was a good draft and even argued with fellow drafturbators about it
Posted via Mobile Device

Marcellus 09-14-2010 11:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 7005058)
Just yesterday morning the two of us were discussing how we thought KC had a legit chance at winning because of the likelihood of a fired-up defense in the MNF atmosphere limiting Ryan Matthews' effectiveness. That's pretty much what happened. And we're part of that camp they call the "Drafturbators."
Look even some of the draftobators knew we had a chance to win.

I am pretty sure Mecca along with Dane predicted an epic blowout. 2 of the more vocal draftobators.

-King- 09-14-2010 11:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 7005058)
Just yesterday morning the two of us were discussing how we thought KC had a legit chance at winning because of the likelihood of a fired-up defense in the MNF atmosphere limiting Ryan Matthews' effectiveness. That's pretty much what happened. And we're part of that camp they call the "Drafturbators."
Dude sorry. You're not a drafturbators.
Posted via Mobile Device

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2010 11:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 7005068)
You are wrong more than you will admit.
Bullshit.

When I'm wrong, I've happily admitted that I was wrong because 90% of the time, it's what's best for the Chiefs organization.

Unfortunately, that's been rare as of late. Hopefully, the tide is turning.

Marcellus 09-14-2010 11:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing (Post 7005073)
I give Dane his credit. He did like the draft from the get go. He said it was a good draft and even argued with fellow drafturbators about it
Posted via Mobile Device
Yea, Dane was actually fairly complimentary of the draft.

Problem with grouping people is when they have differences in opinion they get offended when the group is called out.

No difference than all the dumbass "True Fan" references.

DaneMcCloud 09-14-2010 11:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 7005078)
Look even some of the draftobators knew we had a chance to win.

I am pretty sure Mecca along with Dane predicted an epic blowout. 2 of the more vocal draftobators.
So, is Drafturbator a derogatory term? If not, what is it?

I never once criticized this draft. As a matter of fact, I LOVED it and defended it vehemently this offseason.

chiefsnorth 09-14-2010 11:59 AM
What is the definition of a draft tabulator?


I get that the people involved are those who want to burn alive anyone who largely agrees with what Pioli is doing, but what does it have to do with the draft or with turbation?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:30 AM.
Page 24 of 45 « First 1420212223 24 2526272834 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.