"Gooooooood....I can FEEL your anger...It makes your posts STRONGER..."

The potential for violence insured your safety. I would have just shot you're lucky he didn't have a gun and unload his clip at teh direction your voice was coming from.

No it isn't the NRA. I have the research at work and will post it tomorrow. I believe it was a college study but I could be mistaken. I have one SDGU myself. I'll bet many members here do. On the other I'll bet the only member on the BB that has had exposure to a school pipe bomb terrorist is a member named Hamas.

You continue to not address the run and snitch poilicy when a student is assaulted though. You endorsed that previously with the threat of being expelled. All you could give us was that ridiculous pipe bomb story which has nothing to do with your endorsement of the said policy.

I think your losing it dude, seriously.

I appreciate your honest feelings. On a global level I would like you show me one ecomomically superior culture in the history of mankind that controlled their own destiny without the use of violence. Better yet I would like you to show me the fall of any such culture that wasn't somehow related to the saturation of passivism within their own community. This passive culture will eventually lead to our own downfall IMO. People like Denise know this which is why she is for it.

OBTUSE!!!!! ROFL ROFL ROFL

another word people use to look superior.....

That's a really good question, Mr. noa949.

I don’t recall, and believe there is not, any reference in the accepted New Testament that represents a quote by Jesus on the specific subject of homosexuality. For my part, I’m certain that Jesus would have viewed homosexuals as both welcome to and worthy of God's grace and mercy. He was anti-sin, though. So, I guess you have to make up your mind as to whether or not you perceive homosexuality as sinful.

I have read many scholars who subscribe to the view that Jesus was more concerned with what was in a person’s heart and mind as opposed to their willingness to conform to a given society’s accepted practices. This seems to be this new bishop’s perspective. There’s a problem with this view though. And again, it is a paradox.

On the one hand, Jesus completely ignored certain aspects of the law (traditional observance of the Sabbath, for example). On the other hand, he was quite clear that he was both a product of and a manifestation of the law and the Covenant. The law, of course, viewed fornication as an “abomination”. That’s a really bad word in Hebrew. In fact, in Leviticus I believe, you’ll find specific references as to the penalty for homosexuality. It is death.

FAX

Isn't death the penality for life? Or Hetrosexuality? Or being conservative? Wait we all die.....

violence....there is a time and place for everything....and I plan on being prepared..... %(/

Good point...

I'll wait until I die, after that I make no promises...

$#it, killed another thread...

I'll admit it....ya lost me.....

Threadkiller. :shake:

I tend to post some smartass BS that no one feels like touching so the thread falls to the 2nd page a lot.