ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Denise, here's your warning... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=161530)

FAX 04-19-2007 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by memyselfI
I apologize if he didn't actually cast a vote FOR. His posts have been continually arguing FOR thus my assumption that he was actually one of them. Still, he's arguing their position so while there isn't outright guilt by association you don't see anyone from the AGAINST side posting kudos to him, do we?

You missed my point entirely.

FAX

BIG_DADDY 04-19-2007 12:05 PM

1 Attachment(s)
How dare you treat my people this way.

|Zach| 04-19-2007 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise
If you don't think she was trying to intimidate him with the threat of legal action in the PM that he posted, I think you're crazy.

The intent is clear, even if there was waffle room left for just this sort of a situation.

No, what I am saying is I have never seen the damn thing...I can't see every post on this board.

patteeu 04-19-2007 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler
Oh shit I am straight up owning patty.

Between ringleaders first post in Sept through the 04 election he only posted a whopping 37 times in the Lounge!

Yet he starts 235 freaking threads in 3 months in the DC!

LMAO



ROFL

Whatever you say, man. I guess you've proved that RINGLEADER "almost never posted in the Lounge" with his 500+ posts. Or at least that he posted a lot of threads in DC. Those are exactly the same things aren't they? :shrug:

Sorry if I embarrassed you by calling you on your BS.

crazycoffey 04-19-2007 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach|
I keep hearing about this...but only from people referring to it...never seen anything from the source on this happening. :hmmm:


If I remeber it was sent to another Mod On Duty.

My point about it yesterday is not that she specifically and that specific PM is a cause for a ban, because that's not my call. My intent was to discuss the idea overall, for proper planet etique. What I got from you yesterday is that PM's can't be seen unless they are shared and even then modified so the real truth isn't known.

Therefore, in theory, I could PM someone with threats and you couldn't prove that I did unless I admitted to it. I don't understand it, but it appears that this is the end of the debate.

Today I'm just bitching about it.



(I should probably add that I'm not about to send her a PM, so don't worry)

memyselfI 04-19-2007 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise
If you don't think she was trying to intimidate him with the threat of legal action in the PM that he posted, I think you're crazy.


If I wanted to sue him I would tell him I'll sue. I failed to tell him who I would complain to and not that I would sue thus left the window open for interpretation. My bad.

Trust me, he isn't worth the .39 to send a formal complaint, the gas to get somewhere to file, or the time to Google for a place to file a complaint off the board.

Redrum_69 04-19-2007 12:07 PM

Talk about beating a dead horse


%(/ %(/ %(/

:spank: :spank: :spank:

:whackit: :whackit: :whackit:

crazycoffey 04-19-2007 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by memyselfI
If you are laughing and posting kudos to him for those types of sexual attacks on THE BOARD (as we ALL see it) then you can consider yourself a said neanderthal. If not, then don't own it. Unless of course you are getting the warm fuzzies and just not making them public.


I'll stop if you stop (offensive posts)

crazycoffey 04-19-2007 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by memyselfI
If I wanted to sue him I would tell him I'll sue. I failed to tell him who I would complain to and not that I would sue thus left the window open for interpretation. My bad.

Trust me, he isn't worth the .39 to send a formal complaint, the gas to get somewhere to file, or the time to Google for a place to file a complaint off the board.


here comes the spin cycle......

crazycoffey 04-19-2007 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by memyselfI
I apologize if he didn't actually cast a vote FOR. His posts have been continually arguing FOR thus my assumption that he was actually one of them. Still, he's arguing their position so while there isn't outright guilt by association you don't see anyone from the AGAINST side posting kudos to him, do we?


and if you think everyone that voted "not to ban" is on your side, you're more delusional than I thought.

Frazod 04-19-2007 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by memyselfI
If you are laughing and posting kudos to him for those types of sexual attacks on THE BOARD (as we ALL see it) then you can consider yourself a said neanderthal. If not, then don't own it. Unless of course you are getting the warm fuzzies and just not making them public.

When did I post a kudo?

And what warm fuzzies am I getting?

Apparently you're the one who is the expert on everything. Penchief will need to amend his accusations accordingly.

I can assure you of one thing, however; I don't have nearly enough hair to be a neanderthal. Sorry.

NewChief 04-19-2007 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazycoffey
and if you think everyone that voted "not to ban" is on your side, you're more delusional than I thought.

She's said repeatedly that she isn't under such a delusion.

Those of you who waste your time and effort going back and forth with her are the delusional ones. I have never, ever, ever, ever seen someone get a satisfactory "victory" over her. They may soundly trounce her in logic, prove her wrong, reveal her to be a liar, unmask her mean spiritedness, and have clear evidence of all, but they'll still find no satisfaction. She'll just twist and divert the argument to other grounds. Trust me, you're fighting a wasteful, losing battle.

rad 04-19-2007 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise
If you don't think she was trying to intimidate him with the threat of legal action in the PM that he posted, I think you're crazy.

The intent is clear, even if there was waffle room left for just this sort of a situation.


http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...&postcount=102

I'm not on her side, (I think she comes off as a female David Spade; I hate David Spade) but if you are referring to this then I see no threat of legal action, just reporting to a mod.

dirk digler 04-19-2007 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu
Whatever you say, man. I guess you've proved that RINGLEADER "almost never posted in the Lounge" with his 500+ posts. Or at least that he posted a lot of threads in DC. Those are exactly the same things aren't they? :shrug:

Sorry if I embarrassed you by calling you on your BS.

Sure if you want to count DC as part of the Lounge then yeah he really has participated. But that is not what we are talking about here.

He started 235 threads in 3 months in the DC while only posting 37 times in the Lounge during that same time spread. I don't know what else you need to know.

As I stated before since the rule came out he has posted almost all the time in the Lounge and I don't think if he ever posts in DC anymore.

Also just to be fair Jaz should participate more in the Lounge as well

memyselfI 04-19-2007 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazycoffey
here comes the spin cycle......

Unlike you, he's done nothing to be sued over. The sexual harrassing words you have typed would be illegal in most situations off the board. As for Iowa Bob, being the single most vulgar and vile person on my non-ignore list isn't illegal. Lucky for him though, you have come along and give him some stiff competition in the face of his new non-existance in my life.

We'll see how far you choose to go and how far you are allowed to.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.