You weren't here, so you're once again talking about something you know nothing about.

And I just happened to have had a newborn in August, so MY time was limited.

But that's cool, go ahead and insult me for not watching a team in West Virginia, because, you know, they're broadcast every week in SoCal.

And where and when did I say that?

Where have I stated that ANY of the 2013 QB's would be failures, successes, so on and so forth? Or, where have I stepped outside my knowledge base and offered poor advice to someone?

I'm a douche because BossChief said "Coming out of college" instead of prospects as rated by NFL Scouts.

That's nice.

It's pretty clear what "coming out of college means".

Unless you're being disingenuous.

Or you're just flat ****ing stupid.

ROFL

Talk about completely missing the point.

I'm not insulting you for not watching.

I'm insulting you because you feel the need to insult me because I do.

Way to make it all about you, the constant victim.

Really? I wasn't here in October?

Huh. That's odd because I began posting again sometime around the end of July 2012 so technically, October 2012 is between July 2012 and February 2013.

Unless there's some new Top Secret Scouting Report I missed that has redefined the Gregorian Calendar.

I didn't insult you for watching college football.

I asked that if I were to watch all of the games, would I be allowed to join the club?

Completely different.

You can join my club if you'll pay the low, low one time entry fee of 11,000 dollars.

I said A logical side.
I'm not getting into this with you.
You've never budged an inch as long as I've "known" you. I don't expect you to now.

Another Dane bleed out session I see.... how surprising...

Personally, the Combine, Pro Days, + Senior Bowl shouldn't radically alter how one views a prospect (without knowledge as to interviews, etc.) The majority of one's opinion should be primarily based on film available/personal viewings of a prospect.

JMHO though.

YOU said that your answer was gonna stay the same after we wrote the explanation in crayon for ya.

So, yes...that IS what YOU wrote.

Sorry you couldn't connect the dots yourself, Douchelord Blowhard.

I think it's a mix of both. You have to watch the tape and then ask the player why he made the mistakes he made...then, based on his response, you go back to the tape and see what you can do to correct it, if at all. Then, you follow up with future interviews and then in the private workout, you try to see if he can or can't do things you will ask him to do if you draft him...some things you want to see if he has made improvements since the film you saw and some things you may not have seen on tape, but want to see him do it because if you draft them, it's part of their job.

It's all part of assessing how far the QB will need to go, mentally and physically, once you draft him...before he can get on the field.

This is the part that I think Barkley, Wilson and Geno will help themselves...Geno being the biggest profiteer.

Geno should wow gms and coaches on the board with X's and O's, in his interviews about on nd off the field stuff and should be able to blow them away with his throwing to every area of the field.

Yeah, I like the combine for limited purposes.

Geno: Has Weinke fixed his footwork to where he will step and drive? If so, the combine will show that and he's at a clear 'elite' level as a prospect.

Barkley: Is his arm sound?

But for most things, the tape should tell you more than the combine.

Barkley isn't gonna throw at the combine...and Dysert injured his hamstring while working out.