Every school save Duke, Kentucky, North Carolina, Indiana, and Kansas that isn't a mid-major is a football school.

They are about the same level of competitiveness.

Pretty much... KU had just lost to a team 61-7 that struggled to make the Meineke Car Care Bowl. It took a miracle to beat Northern Illinois, and that was a good day.

Sure, MU/KU should be much more important than a non-conference game in BB or FB, but telling us we should care about one more ass whooping is just as ridiculous as checking the attendance figures for MU/Kennesaw State. Actually, it's more ridiculous, because at least the latter is pretty much a guaranteed win, where the former is just another day at the factory of sadness.

It's not a binary. You just listed schools with rich basketball traditions. Schools like Missouri, Minnesota, Maryland are just schools. No traditions in anything.

Yeah, winning a national title in basketball doesn't mean anything.
:spock:

What does winning a national title in basketball mean?

Wouldn't it mean that a program has tradition?

I guess that depends on your definition of tradition.

Does UTEP have a basketball tradition?

Possibly if they are consistently in the tournament every year.

So wait....there are 5 basketball schools and the rest are football schools?

It's been that way since late in the evening on 4/7/08.

Oklahoma got raped last night.

http://cdn0.sbnation.com/imported_as...-68_medium.gif

UCLA?

All these haters...

...see you later...

http://media.columbiatribune.com/img...7501865a0e2373