DJ's left nut |
11-26-2012 06:08 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58
(Post 9154611)
Agreed.
None of them are a Luck/RGIII prospect, but there are a handful of guys that are better prospects than the Tannehills/Ponders/Lockers of the world.
I think Geno is obviously tops in the class, followed by a bit of a gap.
Then you could throw Barkley, Murray, Wilson and Bray all into a hat and pick.
|
Eh, it's more involved than that. It's really want you want at that point.
If you want a high risk, high reward guy - you go Bray and trust that you can mature him over the next couple of years.
You want a 'safe' pick - you go Barkley and build a WCO around him.
Don't put stock in height as a determining factor? Then Murray is your guy; he'll, he's been a better pure passer than Smith this year.
Swear by the Bledsoe/Manning model of tall, strong-armed passers but don't want to run the risk of a Cutler-esque douche in your huddle (i.e. Bray), then Landry Jones is your guy.
And Wilson is probably the best overall blend of polish and potential outside of Geno in the draft.
After Smith, there are so many ways to distinguish each of these picks from each other, everyone should be able to find a #2 choice based on their preferences at the position. It's just just a pile of faceless QBs, these are all very different guys that could all succeed for very different reasons.
It's a fascinating QB draft.
|