ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Royals *** Official 2016 Royals Repository, Version 1 *** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=299181)

nychief 08-15-2016 06:44 AM

More importantly... Why in **** are we talking about Amos Otis?

Fansy the Famous Bard 08-15-2016 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nychief (Post 12368962)
More importantly... Why in **** are we talking about Amos Otis?

https://i.imgflip.com/18yimb.jpg

BigCatDaddy 08-15-2016 08:07 AM

Amos Otis and Soren Petro keep hijacking this beautiful thread

Prison Bitch 08-15-2016 08:50 AM

There's no evidence "clutch hitting" exists. I just looked up Hosmer who has always been "clutch" esp last year when he had the 3rd highest (of 222) clutch score of 2.19 in Royals history. Only 1976 Brett and 2014 Gordon had higher. Then in the playoffs his splits with runners on were so drastic too.



This year? -0.01 clutch score.

BigCatDaddy 08-15-2016 11:42 AM

So does "choking" exist?

Fansy the Famous Bard 08-15-2016 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 12369431)
So does "choking" exist?

I think heightened intensity and nerves in big situations can definitely play a role, negatively.

suzzer99 08-15-2016 12:15 PM

"clutch" exists in the absence of choke.

Although I swear Elway couldn't focus sometimes until he got into crunch time. Also Montana - 4 SBs, 11 TDs, 0 INTs. Hard to argue against that. Some can handle the fog of war some can't.

I agree something like baseball or basketball with much higher variance on each play, clutch seems to not exist.

tk13 08-15-2016 12:34 PM

Anyone who doesn't believe choking exists has never watched a bad relief pitcher pitch. There are plenty of guys who were decent relievers, but the second you put them in the pressure situation in the 8th or 9th inning, they'd fall apart. Not every single time, but they were obviously less effective.

WilliamTheIrish 08-15-2016 12:45 PM

Quote:

I do remember that some of the less-knowledgeable fans used to criticize Otis because they didn't think he played as hard as he could, especially when he was patrolling center field. What they didn't understand was that Otis ran so fluidly and smoothly that he was actually sprinting. It just appeared effortless. I'll never forget watching him go back one night on a ball hit to straightaway center field. He didn't appear to be running fast at all, but when he hit the wall he literally broke several bones in his face. He was actually running in beast mode.
The old men didn't like AO because he was one of the first players to catch fly balls with one hand. Two hands was THE PROPER WAY TO CATCH A FLY BALL!!

Also, the game you're referring to - and I'm pretty sure we're near the same age- was against the Baltimore Orioles. I was at that game. A Saturday day game. My little league team took the bus to that game. Bobby Grich hit the ball to CF and AO smashed into the wall at the old Municipal. He didn't break any bones in his face, but was taken off the field.

Denny Matthews referred to that play in his book.

WilliamTheIrish 08-15-2016 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Dink
Did Bill James watch AO's career in full context or did he just see numbers out of their context because he was a big market by?

You were left in a tub alone as a child. It's the only reason you're making statements like the one quoted.

jet62 08-15-2016 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 12369576)
The old men didn't like AO because he was one of the first players to catch fly balls with one hand. Two hands was THE PROPER WAY TO CATCH A FLY BALL!!

Also, the game you're referring to - and I'm pretty sure we're near the same age- was against the Baltimore Orioles. I was at that game. A Saturday day game. My little league team took the bus to that game. Bobby Grich hit the ball to CF and AO smashed into the wall at the old Municipal. He didn't break any bones in his face, but was taken off the field.

Denny Matthews referred to that play in his book.

I was about 8 years old and was sitting with my Dad in the right field bleachers that day. I still remember that play. They carried Amos off on a stretcher.

siberian khatru 08-15-2016 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 12369555)
Anyone who doesn't believe choking exists has never watched a bad relief pitcher pitch. There are plenty of guys who were decent relievers, but the second you put them in the pressure situation in the 8th or 9th inning, they'd fall apart. Not every single time, but they were obviously less effective.

I always think of Calvin Schiraldi in the 1986 World Series. You could see in his eyes that he looked terrified.

WhawhaWhat 08-15-2016 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by siberian khatru (Post 12369663)
I always think of Calvin Schiraldi in the 1986 World Series. You could see in his eyes that he looked terrified.

And Game 6 of the ALCS last year is another reason why people think Wade Davis is a robot.

WilliamTheIrish 08-15-2016 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet62 (Post 12369638)
I was about 8 years old and was sitting with my Dad in the right field bleachers that day. I still remember that play. They carried Amos off on a stretcher.

I thought he was dead. No padding. He looked rather peaceful laying on George Toma's grass.

Pretty unbelievable that we have at least two people on this board that saw that game live.

duncan_idaho 08-15-2016 02:51 PM

I don't believe that "clutchness" really exists - the ability to raise one's game and perform even better than your best in crunch time. At least not in baseball.

But I do believe "anti-clutchness" exists ... The propensity for performing WORSE in key spots. Some guys just can't do it under the bright lights.

I do think there are some characteristics that make a hitter better in the clutch spots... Ability to work counts, batting eye, willingness to shorten up and approach the situation appropriately, etc. But that's not really "clutch." That's "smart."


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.