Why would Denver take Luck? They have Tebow.

I didn't mean it would **** his career up, just that they would be wasting him. Also, Rodgers wasn't even close to this hyped coming out of college. Shit, he slid to 25 or 26, he wasn't hyped as a franchise changer from day 1 like Luck is.

If anything, it looks like the 3 years helped Rodgers.

It is interesting that the Packers didn't have to suck to draft a franchise QB in the first round. Who is this (coming draft) year's Rogers?

I feel sorry for any rookie QB to end up in Miami. That place is a mess. Then again knowing they can have Luck may bring in a top notch coaching staff

Who cares what Rodgers hype was before the draft? How's he doing now?

Are you going to sit here and say that because Luck is so hyped up that he's going to come in and be as good or better than Aaron Rodgers?

Yes. I've seen people here absolutely lamenting the prospect of Indy getting Luck and ruling the roost for 12 more years. I wondered if those same KC fans would rather see Denver get Luck.

Luck and Tebow on the field at the same time??!

http://www.funnyqanda.com/images/boom-headshot.jpg

The depth of your football knowledge is simpy immeasurable. Tell us more.

Why would you rather see Luck in your own division? Ignorant.

That's a pretty stupid thing to wonder about. Would you rather see New England get another great QB, or Oakland?

I would absolutely HATE if Luck went to Indy. Nothing would piss me off more.......

If I had my way, I'd have Luck end up in either Miami or Minnesota. I could at least stand to see him on those teams. I'm still disappointed that we wont be getting him.

I'm serious, trade away the entire 2012 draft for Luck if we have to.

As much as it would suck to see him go to Indy, it doesn't even compare to the worst case scenario of Denver getting Luck.

Foles or Barkley?

I assume Landry Jones is the 2nd QB taken though.

Are you going to sit here and pretend that the general feeling all over this board is that he isn't? People aren't even arguing that fact anymore. It's a law of nature at this point.

All I am really saying ITT, is that the thought would cross their mind. That is all, throw the world at them and they will at least hesitate for 2.5 seconds before they say no. That is all, it was never meant to be a who is better type of argument.

Foles isn't a first round projection so it would have to either be Jones or Barkley.