ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Teicher: Chiefs have failed to turn a corner... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=110778)

the Talking Can 02-25-2005 12:17 PM

in a nutshell, what's the difference between FS and SS?

Taco John 02-25-2005 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can
in a nutshell, what's the difference between FS and SS?



A Free Safety is your cover (or "pass") safety. He's generally not assigned a particular player (or really even area, save 'deep') and is "free" to react to the play and go where the play goes.

A Strong Safety is your safety on the tight-end side... He's your "run" safety. He needs to be a strong tackler and be able to shed blocks, as obviously, most teams will run to the strong side where there is an extra blocker (the te).


Free safety = pass safety
Strong safety = run safety

Taco John 02-25-2005 12:27 PM

Works the same way with strong and weak side linebackers too...

the Talking Can 02-25-2005 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rootin'Tootin'Taco
A Free Safety is your cover (or "pass") safety. He's generally not assigned a particular player (or really even area, save 'deep') and is "free" to react to the play and go where the play goes.

A Strong Safety is your safety on the tight-end side... He's your "run" safety. He needs to be a strong tackler and be able to shed blocks, as obviously, most teams will run to the strong side where there is an extra blocker (the te).


Free safety = pass safety
Strong safety = run safety

that helps, thanks....

the Talking Can 02-25-2005 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe
I'm not locking in on SS or FS.

I think Pile can play both. And I actually think that, at this point, Wesley might be better at FS than SS.

following taco's breakdown, maybe Woods and Wesley need to be flipped, allowing the slower Woods to play the run more (assuming the worst case scenario where Woods is still a starter)...

tomahawk kid 02-25-2005 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can
following taco's breakdown, maybe Woods and Wesley need to be flipped, allowing the slower Woods to play the run more (assuming the worst case scenario where Woods is still a starter)...

I never thought Wesley was fast enough to be a FS.

ChiefsCountry 02-25-2005 12:47 PM

I'm glad Teicher just figured this out. I swear the Chiefs fans are smarter than both the media and front office.

tomahawk kid 02-25-2005 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry
I'm glad Teicher just figured this out. I swear the Chiefs fans are smarter than both the media and front office.

Put together.

Lzen 02-25-2005 01:04 PM

Yeah, it is kinda funny that Teicher is just now writing an article about this. Chiefs fans on this bb have been discussing this exact problem for years.

About NE, I would say yes, their front 7 is exceptional. But I would also say that their 2 safeties have played better than our starting 2 safeties, as well.

Taco John 02-25-2005 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can
following taco's breakdown, maybe Woods and Wesley need to be flipped, allowing the slower Woods to play the run more (assuming the worst case scenario where Woods is still a starter)...


I think both of your safeties are too slow. The strong safety can get away with being slow if he's got good instincts off the snap and can put himself in position to make a play. But you want someone with wheels at FS, and you guys haven't had that since before Woods broke his leg (despite his "mysterious" (cough*bogus*cough) Pro Bowl appearance last year).

jspchief 02-25-2005 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lzen
About NE, I would say yes, their front 7 is exceptional. But I would also say that their 2 safeties have played better than our starting 2 safeties, as well.

Without a doubt. That supports my point. I don't think what Troy Brown did was as exceptional as the media likes to make it out to be. He simply had the luxury of playng CB on a team that takes a hell of a lot of pressure off of the CBs.

Lzen 02-25-2005 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief
Without a doubt. That supports my point. I don't think what Troy Brown did was as exceptional as the media likes to make it out to be. He simply had the luxury of playng CB on a team that takes a hell of a lot of pressure off of the CBs.

Yup. He would get killed if he had to play on the Chiefs defense.

whoman69 02-25-2005 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Otter
Anyone ever pondered putting Battle at safety. Ya know, the position he played all through college, before he turns into Bartee part duex.

Do you propose we pick up 5 CBs? If you convert all of them to safety, we won't have anyone to play CB. Like it or not, we have to keep some of our defenders.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.