![]() |
Quote:
|
Any thread that has the words "Gannon" and "Hall of Fame" in the same proximity deserves nothing but ridicule.
|
I'm peeing in the mouth of this thread.
|
Well, looky who slithered out of the DC forum...
|
Quote:
Gannon at least got the team in the playoffs, then Grbac recovered just in time to LOSE in the playoffs. Lemmee guess..you would rather have had Grbac the whole year....Gannon WAS good imo but not HOF material maybe you're the delusional and stupid one |
Quote:
Tell me again how the QUARTERBACK made one ****ing iota of difference in the outcome of those games? Did you even WATCH the 1997 Chiefs? Do you know who Derrick Thomas is? |
Quote:
One better. Islamibitch loves terrorists and hates Americans, therefore she must be Osama's Bahama Momma! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
7-2 and 6-1 means Grbac lost twice as many games as Gannon All i'm saying is that I thought Gannon was better than Grbac Derrick Thomas is the best linebacker of the nineties (6 sacks in one game TWICE in his career (seahawks and raiders) is pretty impressive) 126 in his whole career reached the 100 sacks mark faster than any other linebacker thats all I can think of right now without looking stuff up |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
As a leader of the bash King Carl clan I have to stick up for our CEO/GM/El Presidente here....He has admitted and I think he has said publically on more than one occasion that keeping Grbac over Gannon was his biggest mistake as the Chiefs GM ever.
|
Hey, you know, something just occurred to me. :hmmm:
If Denise likes Gannon and Peterson likes Gannon, then Denise is Carl. And Rufus Dawes. The secret's out. |
Quote:
That's quite possibly the DUMBEST statement I've seen on this bulletin board. |
Quote:
Face it, Grbac sucked. Thats why he was riding the pine in Bal. contemplating retirement(which he did) while Gannon tossed int's in the SUPER BOWL. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.