ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Would we have seen a Star Trek film in 1979 without Star Wars in '77? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=157896)

Calcountry 02-05-2007 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod
I guess you missed 2001. :shake:

I just loved that scene where the Monkey picked up the bone, studied for a little while, banged it on some other bones, saw that it was destructive, THEN GOT AN IDEA!!!111.

Then they went out and PILLAGED the other baboons, took their water hole and FEASTED on some MEAT> aaalahhaa.

Calcountry 02-05-2007 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs
2001 didn't spawn anything. It came out in 1968. It was the exception to the rule - Hollywood wasn't making science fiction for the better part of a decade.

Then Star Wars came along and science fiction returned - thanks to the Messiah.

http://george.lucas.net/George%20Lucas2.jpg

Wow, out of one cult and into the next.

Frazod 02-05-2007 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bunnytrdr
I agree, Wrath of Khan was the best Star Trek movie in the series.

My personal favorite was First Contact, with Wrath of Khan running a very close second.

DaWolf 02-05-2007 01:27 AM

Close Encounters of the Third Kind also came out in '77 and was another Sci Fi pic that did well and is mentioned by Shatner as another influence in pushing for a film vs TV version. And Hollywood is just full of people who try to put forth something if it proves to be hot.

But Star Trek was coming back one way or another, and there would have eventually been a motion picture. But no doubt the success of sci fi movies in the late 70's helped the studio jack up the budget to get the film version made...

|Zach| 02-05-2007 01:30 AM

I fear that even clicking on this thread will mean a girl won't touch my penis for a month.

Deberg_1990 02-05-2007 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by (Zach)
I fear that even clicking on this thread will mean a girl won't touch my penis for a month.


Doesnt that already happen anyways?? LOL

Deberg_1990 02-05-2007 06:53 AM

Actually, without Star Wars, there would have been no "Battle Beyond the Stars" and about 50 other low budget Sci-Fi movies in the late 70's, early 80's.....

Braincase 02-05-2007 07:19 AM

I think the more appropriate question is "Would there have ever been a Star Wars if it weren't for the original Star Trek series?".

StcChief 02-05-2007 07:21 AM

Growing up watch TOS

Star Wars was the after thought.

2112 02-05-2007 07:46 AM

Star Trek did it all on it's own
:spock:

http://www.clicksmilies.com/s1106/st...smiley-023.gif

Hammock Parties 02-05-2007 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod
Star Wars: 6 movies.

Star Trek: 5 TV series and 10 movies, with No. 11 in development.

You're missing the point. None of that has anything do with 1979.

Hammock Parties 02-05-2007 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Braincase
I think the more appropriate question is "Would there have ever been a Star Wars if it weren't for the original Star Trek series?".

Absolutely. George was inspired by the classic serials of his childhood, including Buck Rogers.

Lzen 02-05-2007 09:22 AM

Wasn't there plenty of sci fi in the 70s?
-Battlestar Galactica tv series.
-Soylent Green.
-A Clockwork Orange
-Logan's Run

Hammock Parties 02-05-2007 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lzen
Wasn't there plenty of sci fi in the 70s?

No.

Lzen 02-05-2007 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs
No.

Oh, ok. Thanks for clearing that up.
:rolleyes:

Look, I loved both the Star Trek series/movies and the Star Wars movies. But for anyone to insinuate that the Star Trek movies rode the coat tails of Star Wars is just idiotic. As a sci fi fan, I'm just glad both were allowed to be created. I've enjoyed them all.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.