Too true... Tony G and this interview are about the closest we should expect to get to answers.

How about this:

If Croyle starts opening game, you can have my sig.

If Huard starts opening game, I get your sig.

Game?

I already offered you a similar wager (I deleted the first offer, as all wagers are for "entertainment purposes only").

Sure, I'm game.

You do realize that it still doesn't prove anything other than your ability to play probabilities, right?

The only thing I realize is the fact you continue to leave yourself "outs" for when Huard starts opening game.

I already know what your rebuttal is going to be when Huard is indeed the starter for the Chiefs opening game next season.

But hey, at least you can say you're never wrong...

You should man up and say, right now, without anything else, Brodie Croyle is going to start game #1 for the Chiefs next year.

I don't think you'll do it.

This line:

Brodie Croyle will start opening game for the Chiefs next year.

I don't have to leave myself any "outs".

The only opinion that I've EVER espoused is that Huard SHOULDN'T be our starting QB going forward.

Whether he starts or not is immaterial. It doesn't change the fact that he's a career backup QB that's over 30 and going NOWHERE.

A good team would start Brodie Croyle.

The Chiefs, with Herm Edwards, are a SAFE team. They're not a GOOD team.

I'll say it, unless Green stays somehow and keeps the starting role, Brodie Croyle will be our Starting QB on opening day.

Let me recap the last 6 months or so on the Huard debate between you and I:

Very beginning: (Green still injured, Huard playing well)

Hootie: I think Huard is a better fit for the Chiefs in this system then Green.
htismaqe: You're an idiot, no he isn't, everyone hates you.

(Green gets healthy, starts vs. the Raiders)

Hootie: Man, Green sucks ass, I can't believe Huard isn't playing.
htismaqe: Huard wouldn't do any better. I know that for a fact. I'm Mr. Fact guy.
Hootie: Oh.

(Green continues playing poorly, Chiefs lose three in a row)

Hootie: Jesus Christ, I can't believe they are still allowing Green to play over Huard.
htismaqe: It's the line, not Green. I realize Huard had the SAME ****ING LINE BLOCKING FOR HIM, but Green slept with Jordan Black's boyfriend and that made Black angry, so that's why Green is playing so bad. He's better than Huard for this team, I know that for a fact. I'm Mr. Fact Guy.

(Offseason starts - I'll leave out the ATROCIOUS Colts game)

Hootie: I know we're going to resign Huard and get rid of Green. No doubt in my mind Huard is the starting QB for the Chiefs next year.
htismaqe: You're an idiot. He's a UFA. He isn't resigning in KC. You're ****ing stupid.

(Huard resigns)

Hootie: Man, I sure was right about Huard.
htismaqe: Uh, uh, oh, uh, uh uhm CROYLE IS STARTING HUARD SIGNED FOR BACKUP MONEY THAT'S WHAT I MEANT ALL ALONG.
Hootie: Oh, yeah.

(Tony G says he's confident in Huard on NFL Network)

Hootie: Man, it sure is looking like Huard is going to start next year.
htismaqe: It's 50/50, like I said all along. I'm always right.

embarrassed, htismaqe?

Out of all that trash you just typed, one shining kernel of truth stands out above the rest.

have you scouted DolphinsPlanet yet? Any good? Let me know.

obligatory "OMG Schefter is on the Donks payroll!!!"

You should really learn how to use the search function.

Here's a thread from June 2006, where I tell everybody in the thread that keeping Printers and cutting Huard would be the worst move the Chiefs could make.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...ighlight=huard

Here's a post 9/17/2006 where I clearly state that the offensive line hurt HUARD. In fact, it was a common theme all year long, regardless of who was playing QB, and you'd know that if you knew how to use the search function.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...rd#post3424935

And I continuously stated that the reason *I* thought Trent Green should start when he came back was because I'm an old schooler that doesn't believe the starter should lose his job because of injury. I also stated multiple times that Huard failed to do a single thing above and beyond what Trent did, which is, to this day 100% correct.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...rd#post3533940

I openly admitted that Huard should have been inserted as the starter at halftime of the playoff game.

I had Damon Huard as my #1 overachiever for the year.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...rd#post3726736

As far as me saying we weren't going to sign Huard, find it. I'm guessing you'll have just as much luck finding that post as I did. Probably because it DOESN'T EXIST.

Yeah, right.

I can't always make you look like an idiot right away. Sometimes it requires some research.