nice.

What exactly were the problems?

I'm not real sure, but they kept him out of football for two years, and then knocked him out of our 2006 season two games in. :shake:

Yup. What he said.



I love Turley's disposition and attitude.

There is another #74 that might be available via trade. That was a rumor earlier this offseason i haven't heard much more about.

Jacksonville signed Tony Pashos to be their new RT. I wouldn't mind trying to aquire this guy.

http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/players/playerpage/235257

What did they do to his back to allow 309 on it....

There once was a lineman named Turley
Who always showed up for camp early
He said, "I can still block!"
But the roids shrunk his cock,
And now the Chiefs have two Dick Curlys

FAX

We wont go to the playoffs with Huard at the helm either... I would bet your bank account on that as well...

IF he comes back and stays somewhat healthy through training camp and pre-seaon, then blows his back about game 4?

How far does that set Terry or anybody else back that could compete or grow in this position?

I sure hate to see the young guys lose experience, just for Turdley to come and blow his back up AGIAN!

OLine is about consistency.

there's little chance he makes it the whole season at that weight.

so why risk shaking up the line into the season?

fuck him.

As has been said, OL play is about repetition and consistency.

Put together the line now and let them play together...

I highly agree.

What will be interesting is where the young buck backups will play.

Niswanger can play C or G and might challenge Wiegmann for the starting spot, supposedly anyway.

I think they should move Sampson to G to compete with welbourn, but he probably stays at RT.

I'd like to see them leave Svitek at LT. Problem is he could compete with Terry at RT. For the gameday inactive list it is nice to have a 3rd or swing T that plays both L and R. I just hate to see another Jordan Black problem with switching around and the player not being able to handle it.

Stallings should compete at G for a backup spot. We could bring him along slowly since he is probably a bit tired from NFLEL and cause bober can play anywhere but LT ( just not very effectively )

Kind of the same thing with Taylor. They want to work him at RT possibly some LT all while most projected him as a G prospect.

I think it's a good group of young guys, just interesting to see where they line them all up.

You play whoever is healthy and doing the best. I don't think you sit Turley because he has a history of injuries. If he is playing in the same form that he played in NO years ago, then he's the starter.

I thought Turley was only back up to 302? I guess its possible hes added 7 pounds in the last couple days though. I would love for them to pick him back up and fight it out with Terry for the RT spot. Both are proven players who can jump in right after the other one gets hurt. I also don't really get why some people are so down on Croyle... I think hes going to be a good QB for the Chiefs. Is it because he wasn't drafted #1 like Ryan Leaf? They are always saying you have to go with the proven player... well how did the proven player get started if you can't start a young QB?

Where are you guys getting this info on Turley?

He's not saying he is back at 309, that's why it's theoretical. IF he can get back up to 309(and about) and compete throughout training camp without a single injury problem, then SHOULD e give him a chance to start at RT?