![]() |
Quote:
Why is it so important to get Croyle on the move? This has nothing to do with trying not to get him killed, right? |
Quote:
Quote:
|
this all depends if Julius Peppers has himself Huard for lunch i bet he is foaming at the mouth - i'm not yet convinced that Croyle is much more then anything other then a backup QB at this point, he is just to frail to be a QB in the NFL. Huard gives us the best chance to win even if Croyle was healthy
|
This should be interesting. There's an unwritten law in the NFL that says you don't lose your job due to injury. Also, the youth movement dictates that we start Croyle ... at least until he proves once and for all that he isn't the right guy for the job.
My guess is that he'll return as the starter ... with an even shorter leash (if that's possible) this time around. FAX |
Quote:
Sorry, I'm having a difficult time thinking through all the "big plays" Croyle has authored. All the talk of his perceived strengths is meaningless to me because I don't think he'll ever stay on the field consistently. |
Should still be Brodie's job, I thought he performed well until his injury.
|
Maybe they made up their mind on Croyle already.
|
Quote:
Year 1: Injured in training camp. Year 2: Lost job to Huard in camp, injured when inserted as the starter. Never won a game. Year 3: Injured 27 seconds into game 1. Perhaps I'm being too negative, but I don't need to see the next injury. |
Quote:
|
You guys are more reeruned than I thought if you REALLY believe Herm is going to start Huard just to save his job. Not happening.
|
The QB of the future is clearly not on the team at this point. So, there is no reason to not start the QB who gives you the best chance to win, which is clearly Huard.
Case closed. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.