| eazyb81 |
12-23-2008 05:54 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca
(Post 5324177)
Look my argument isn't that Curry sucks, that's the issue here. My argument is you can get a productive player at that position later in the draft.
High LB's are generally good because LB is like RB it's an easy position for a young guy to step into. But many many lower round LB's are good too, the Colts have made a living doing it.
I don't think it's worth a top 5 pick.
|
Ideally I would agree with you. But what if he grades out as the best player? I don't think we should just take a DE, even if he graded out lower, just because you're not supposed to take a LB that high. Do you think the teams that passed on Urlacher or Willis regret passing on them?
I desperately want either Stafford or Bradford, but if we don't get one of those two I'm not sold on who to pick. It could be Orakpo, Curry, Mays, Crabtree, Smith, Jenkins, etc. There's not a clear pick, at least at this point. But from what I've seen from Curry, he definitely should be in the discussion. |
