ChiefsPlanet
Page 3 of 3 12 3
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football What Exactly Determines a Sack? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=200583)

kysirsoze 01-19-2009 03:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 5405429)
lol hes been playing to much madden dude. Ok, if the QB is tackled, or stripped of the ball behind the LOS it is a Sack. Ok so your friend says if its a running play then its not a sack if the qb is tackled. So tell him, how can they prove that the so called "running play" wasnt actually a play-action that just didnt work out? ...he wont have a smart answer if he has one at all to come back from that.
I fit is clear that the QB is trying to run it will not be credited as a sack. If he is simply scrambling to avoid a sack and gets tackled behind the LOS it counts as a sack. Wikipedia was right.

kysirsoze 01-19-2009 03:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TinyEvel (Post 5405588)
What are these "sacks" you speak of?

If, by "sack" you mean there is a possibility to tackle the QB behind the LOS for a loss in yardage, then, someone should definitely tell the Chiefs D coaches about this!

It wold be a really great thing for our team to try in a game!
:LOL:

We are terrible.

Bob Dole 01-19-2009 07:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TinyEvel (Post 5405588)
What are these "sacks" you speak of?

If, by "sack" you mean there is a possibility to tackle the QB behind the LOS for a loss in yardage, then, someone should definitely tell the Chiefs D coaches about this!

It wold be a really great thing for our team to try in a game!
Didn't the competition committee make that illegal last offseason?

Braincase 01-19-2009 08:19 AM
It's always a sack. If it looks like he's trying to hand the ball off, it's a play-action pass. At least, that's what I'd argue.

Otter 01-19-2009 08:20 AM
A healthy scrotum

Amnorix 01-19-2009 08:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 5402093)
BS, even if the QB scrambles for no gain it's still counted as a sack
I dunno. I do know that kneel downs are NOT sacks, so clearly there are exceptions.

I hate that kneel downs count as running players, however. It's incredibly stupid that it affects rushing stats.

Amnorix 01-19-2009 08:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chief52 (Post 5403478)
You will not find a "sack" in the rule book, I would not think. It has nothing to do with the rules. It is a statistic.
You will not even find the rule book to begin with.

It is not online. Only a synopsis of the rules is available, to my everlasting disgust.

MTG#10 01-19-2009 12:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 5405711)
You will not even find the rule book to begin with.

It is not online. Only a synopsis of the rules is available, to my everlasting disgust.
A copy of the 2006 rule book can be found in PDF format with google.

Amnorix 01-19-2009 12:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTG#10 (Post 5406181)
A copy of the 2006 rule book can be found in PDF format with google.
GREAT. It had been at least a couple years since I last looked, so I'm not surprised I didn't know about it.

Thanks for the info.

EyePod 01-19-2009 01:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 5402413)
Usually skin of various colors (black, brown, white) encompassing a set of testicles that for the most part is covered in pubic hair unless the owner of said sack chooses otherwise
That's very comical.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:27 PM.
Page 3 of 3 12 3
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.