ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs Shanahan and what the O would look like!

Page 3 of 3

Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

Shanahan and what the O would look like! (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=200981)

Hammock Parties

01-23-2009 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John (Post 5421390)

*yawn*

You didn't answer the question:

In your delusions, what is the significance of this all going down today?

I pretty much already told you. But here it is again.

The Chiefs have been dancing with Shanahan for weeks. This didn't start today, despite what the national media thinks. But now Pioli is confident he'll be able to land him. Now that he has Herm's replacement in hand, Herm got the axe.

Pretty simple.

Sweet Daddy Hate

01-23-2009 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5420739)

Elway - Stafford
Davis - Johnson
Smith - Bowe
Sharpe - Gonzalez
Zimmerman - Albert
Schlereth - Waters

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5421231)

Unfortunately for Shanny, LJ's contract will keep him in KC.

And unfortunately for you, when Larry is putting up big numbers and the Chiefs' offense is scoring points, he's a complete angel.

My GOD your Homerism knows no bounds! As a Chiefs fan I have to ask:

When DID you get such a hard-on for this guy? I mean, I get that way about DT sometimes, but he's a ****ing CHIEF!

Dude, Absinthe! Valium! Weed; choose SOMETHING.

Taco John

01-23-2009 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5421414)

So why not fire Herm two weeks ago then?

Your "logic" isn't terribly sound.

Hammock Parties

01-23-2009 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John (Post 5421429)

So why not fire Herm two weeks ago then?

Because at that point, Pioli WASN'T confident he could land Shanahan.

Hell, Shanahan's toes were sunk in the sand in Cabo at that point, I believe.

Taco John

01-23-2009 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5421435)

Because at that point, Pioli WASN'T confident he could land Shanahan.

So he didn't fire Herm then because he wasn't confident he was going to get Shanahan?

Please. Herm's 6-26 record was enough evidence. Pioli didn't need two weeks to evaluate anything. You're a fool if you think Herm had a prayer of staying here next season. There was never a chance. Never.

SAUTO

01-23-2009 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John (Post 5421446)

i agree with this point tacoburger

Sweet Daddy Hate

01-23-2009 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5421467)

i agree with this point tacoburger

I second the motion.

Taco John

01-23-2009 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5421467)

i agree with this point tacoburger

That's because Clayton's logic just consumed itself.

http://www.corn-utopia.com/Corn%20Ut...bal%20baby.jpg

SAUTO

01-23-2009 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John (Post 5421476)

That's because Clayton's logic just consumed itself.

http://www.corn-utopia.com/Corn%20Ut...bal%20baby.jpg

damn thats what claythan usually looks like, he ALWAYS talks in circles

Hammock Parties

01-23-2009 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John (Post 5421446)

Look, it's plainly obvious Pioli was keeping Herm around until he had a head coach in hand.

I suppose I should backtrack from my statement. If Pioli completely ****ed up the situation and failed to land another head coach, yes, Herm would still be here. So there was a small chance.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:05 AM.

Page 3 of 3

Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page