Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Whitlock complains that we're too far under the cap. Then he complains that we paid too much for Cassel. To me, the inordinate amount of money we're paying him doesn't hurt us at all. I suppose it could if we signed him to a long-term contract at that amount, but since we're not really spending it now, what difference does it make?
Whitlock? Anyone? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What don't you get? Real players do not sit quietly content holding a clipboard. Dozens - maybe hundreds - of college players every year transfer to get a chance to play. Cassel didn't. |
Quote:
From his Wikipedia bio: Brady played college football for and graduated cum laude from the University of Michigan. He was a backup his first two years while his teammate and future NFL quarterback Brian Griese led the Wolverines to a share of the national championship in 1997 in the Rose Bowl. When he enrolled at Michigan, Brady was seventh on the depth chart and had an intense struggle to get some playing time. At one point, Brady hired a sports psychologist to help him cope with frustration and anxiety and even considered transferring to Cal[7], frustrated by what seemed like a lack of opportunity.[8] Brady battled for the number one quarterback position with Drew Henson and ultimately started every game in the 1998 and 1999 seasons under Michigan head coach Lloyd Carr. During his first full year as starter, he set Michigan records for most pass attempts and completions in a season (214).[9] Brady was All-Big Ten (honorable mention) both seasons and team captain his senior year. The Wolverines won 20 of 25 games when he started and shared the Big Ten Conference title in 1998. Brady capped that season off with a win over Arkansas in the Citrus Bowl.[10] In the 1999 season, Brady led Michigan to an overtime win in the Orange Bowl over Alabama, throwing for 369 yards and four touchdowns. |
Quote:
He was also ineffective as a stater, for 4 games in Washington. He emerged after years of riding the bench and ineffective play. I'm not defending Cassel. I asked the same question. Why wouldn't he transfer? But to suggest that Gannon simply "emerged" after leaving KC for a chance to start is sheer unadulterated bull. |
the media in this town is going to have a tough time getting used to this new regime.
they will try to create drama and strife for their own purposes but it isn't going to work. they will try to get information but the front office won't be pandering to the media anymore. they won't be able to get stories just by ingratiating themselves to the Chiefs or by trying to stir the pot. the team is focusing on football and that is what they should do. whitlock doesn't have an enemy he can use to write a column when he's bored now that Carl is gone. he'll pick some player to antagonize all year. the new quarterback would be a handy foil. |
Quote:
But it's also unadulterated bull to suggest Gannon was ever content as a backup. He kept on plugging, seeking new opportunities to play, even grousing on the sidelines (many will tell you he earned the starting job in KC), and finally found his spot. |
Quote:
The point is, that Gannon flourished only after years and years of development. He was journeyman QB who, after 11 years as an ieffective starter and bench warmer, landed in the right place with the right system. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Two years on the bench + two years starting after competing and winning the job.
. .vs. . One year on the bench + three more years on the bench after losing the job. Yep, Brady was the anti-Cassel. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.