ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs ****Official Revisionist History Thread**** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=217752)

Mecca 11-08-2009 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6244895)
I can't tell if you are being sarcastic or not but I agree with this statement regardless.

I don't understand why Haley is not more aggressive in the first half and even in the 2nd half without the game on the line

Because honestly if you let Cassel do that for an entire game he'll throw picks and like it or not part of this year is about protecting Cassel...his stats make him look better than he's played.

dirk digler 11-08-2009 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6244907)
Little bit of both.

I think Cassel sucks, but the neutered playbook does him absolutely no favors.

I am not on the Cassel sucks bandwagon yet but when the playbook gets opened up he is money most of the time.

When Haley was hired I was expecting the more aggressive approach like we have seen several times this season at the end of games. But Haley's play calling in the first half is Hermesque.

milkman 11-08-2009 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6244899)
He looked awful.

Eric Berry has to be target #1.

Morgan didn't get out of position in pass D often, didn't make any big mistakes, didn't take bad angles, and was damn good in run support.

He still needs to develop, but he played well, and teamed with Berry or Mays, we could have a tremndous safety tamdem moving into the future.

dirk digler 11-08-2009 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6244912)
Because honestly if you let Cassel do that for an entire game he'll throw picks and like it or not part of this year is about protecting Cassel...his stats make him look better than he's played.

Maybe but he doesn't throw INT's at the end of games. They just need to open it up more.

'Hamas' Jenkins 11-08-2009 03:38 PM

Only a dumbass would think that Morgan played poorly.

Dude did really ****ing well for his first start. Didn't get beat deep, kept everything in front of him, and missed *1* tackle, and that was after he wrapped up, but MJD got bulldozed in by his line.

Tribal Warfare 11-08-2009 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6244951)
Only a dumbass would think that Morgan played poorly.

Dude did really ****ing well for his first start. Didn't get beat deep, kept everything in front of him, and missed *1* tackle, and that was after he wrapped up, but MJD got bulldozed in by his line.


After how Mike Brown played I'm on the Berry/Mays sweepstakes bandwagon.

chiefs1111 11-08-2009 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6244951)
Only a dumbass would think that Morgan played poorly.

Dude did really ****ing well for his first start. Didn't get beat deep, kept everything in front of him, and missed *1* tackle, and that was after he wrapped up, but MJD got bulldozed in by his line.

For sure,Morgan played well today in his first start. Hopefully Haley will be smart enough too keep him in the starting lineup.

dirk digler 11-08-2009 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6244951)
Only a dumbass would think that Morgan played poorly.

Dude did really ****ing well for his first start. Didn't get beat deep, kept everything in front of him, and missed *1* tackle, and that was after he wrapped up, but MJD got bulldozed in by his line.

I don't think he played poorly but that first TD he either completely whiffed or went to the wrong hole from what I could tell but he was the run support on that play.

'Hamas' Jenkins 11-08-2009 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefs1111 (Post 6244966)
For sure,Morgan played well today in his first start. Hopefully Haley will be smart enough too keep him in the starting lineup.

He also filled numerous gaps in run support that helped other guys stop MJD. On one play in particular, they blitzed him and he got past the OL and forced the play to the outside, where DeMorrio whiffed but we got MJD down for almost no gain.

The Bad Guy 11-08-2009 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6244933)
Morgan didn't get out of position in pass D often, didn't make any big mistakes, didn't take bad angles, and was damn good in run support.

He still needs to develop, but he played well, and teamed with Berry or Mays, we could have a tremndous safety tamdem moving into the future.

I completely screwed up that post. I thought it said Brown.

Morgan did not do horribly. There's something to build on there.

chiefs1111 11-08-2009 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6244993)
He also filled numerous gaps in run support that helped other guys stop MJD. On one play in particular, they blitzed him and he got past the OL and forced the play to the outside, where DeMorrio whiffed but we got MJD down for almost no gain.

I really think Morgan can be a pretty good safety. He just needs the playing time. Iam sure he will make some mistakes as well but in the long run the Chiefs will be better with him in there.

Marcellus 11-08-2009 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 6244908)
You really don't know anything about football, do you?

Dude, you are fighting a losing battle. There are about 3 people on this entire board who think Morgan had a decent game and that is only because that supports their agenda.

I was hoping he would play well, I was not rooting against him.

Before you question my football knowledge you need to check where your personal agenda and opinions are affecting your stances on things.

KCUnited 11-08-2009 03:52 PM

Every qb, running back, and wr should have an asteriks put by their totats because they played the Chiefs D.

OnTheWarpath15 11-08-2009 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 6245010)
Dude, you are fighting a losing battle. There are about 3 people on this entire board who think Morgan had a decent game and that is only because that supports their agenda.

I was hoping he would play well, I was not rooting against him.

Before you question my football knowledge you need to check where your personal agenda and opinions are affecting your stances on things.

I'd love to see you breakdown of all Morgan's ****-up's today.

For the one obvious mistake in run support on the Jennings TD (which was highlighted by Brown's incompetence) he had many other solid plays in run support, and was rarely if ever out of position in the passing game.

We'll wait.

EyePod 11-08-2009 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6244598)
I can't wait to hear about how clutch Cassel is in the 4th quarter.
About how brilliant that underthrow to Chambers for the TD (and the two underthrows to Bowe were)
About how his QB rating from 5:00 in was perfect.

So, let's ignore the game and crown him king of the prevent

Look, I agree wholeheartedly that Cassel isn't the answer. He looked serviceable in those last drives. That's not what I want in my starting QB though. I don't want serviceable. He did move us down the field, so he made me eat my hat there. But he still looks like he's holding our WR's back with his inaccuracies. If he could throw the ball better we would have more YAC instead of our receivers diving for the ball to make it in the first place. And we still lost.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.