ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs Quest for a new OC.

Page 3 of 6

Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

Quest for a new OC. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=221107)

Frankie

01-04-2010 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 6409634)

My thing is will the new OC run the same offense Haley has been running? Same terminology and all? I think it would make for another transition period which I think would be bad for our players at this point if we changed schemes. I think the O line is getting "it" and Charles has "it". If Cassel's gonna get "it" changing the offense will only hender that IMO.

PhilFree:arrow:

So are you suggesting that Haley should continue being his own OC?

2bikemike

01-04-2010 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 6409733)

I think well do waht we did this year and double our wins. 8 wins unless we fall prey to injury.

PhilFree:arrow:

I'm all for doubling our win total for the next 2 years. Win 8 next year and 16 the year after. And those 16 don't have to be in the regular season either. In fact I would prefer that they weren't.

One can hope and dream. It seems thats all we have as Chief fans.

philfree

01-04-2010 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 6410278)

So are you suggesting that Haley should continue being his own OC?

No. I'm saying it will suck for all these guys to have to learn a new offense or new terminology after actually making some progess late in the season. What offesne does Haley run? And does someone like Weis run a similar offense? Maybe Haley can find an OC to run his offense for him?

PhilFree:arrow:

Easy 6

01-04-2010 10:56 PM

I think Weis would be a relatively seemless transition, they are familiar with each other & it would probably be a very collaborative process, with Haleys word being the final say-so.

Haley loves offense too much to just hand over the reins completely IMO, but Weis would give him the freedom to concentrate more on the big picture during the week & in-game.

HotRoute

01-04-2010 10:57 PM

im honestly starting to think we might end up promoting someone from within to OC next yr. the offense is just starting to click, and to start fresh albeit at the right time (during the offseason & not in the preseason) would probably set the offense back shich is not what we need again

Frankie

01-04-2010 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 6410308)

Gotcha.

DaneMcCloud

01-04-2010 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 6409713)

We lost 6 game this year by 7 points or less. Baltimore we aborted in the last few minutes...I don't think winning 10 games next year is absurd to predict. I, however, think 8 games is more realistic.

LMAO

Last year, it was eight games by seven points or less.

Make up your mind!

:D

DaneMcCloud

01-04-2010 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 6409662)

I don't understand why anyone would look at a future NFL schedule and try to predict wins and losses for any team. It's to the point where the only thing you can count on is a few likely losses and and whole lot of uncertainty.

I picked the Chiefs to win 4 games this season and lose 12 back in August.

Today, I received a $500 payment via Paypal for said prediction.

:D

DaneMcCloud

01-04-2010 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ralphy Boy (Post 6409755)

I'm not getting to 10. San Fran, Buffalo, Oakland x 2, St Louis & Seattle with one win against Denver.

7 wins is my guess. Maybe we beat Jacksonville, but I wouldn't count on it.

San Fran?

With their run game?

Ouch.

DaneMcCloud

01-04-2010 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan88 (Post 6409877)

An easier schedule (on paper) and a new defensive coordinator alone won't magically transform the Chiefs into a 10 win team.

Fat Scott is actually going to have to participate in free agency this offseason (and by "participate" I mean more than just signing 36 year old WRs).

Not.

Gonna.

Happen.

Keep up.

DaneMcCloud

01-04-2010 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6409981)

I disagree. How can you say Oakland will be better when hiring yet another coach? How will Buffalo be imrpoved with questions at QB? Denver won't be a better team without Marshall. So theres ATLEAST 6 wins on the schedule.

Oakland was a 10 win team, minimum, with Gradkowski at the helm.

Minimum.

That team is sooooooooooo loaded at talent on defense and and very good on offense.

Those receivers are bad ass and the running game should have been better. It was under-utilized (much like the Chiefs).

Sam Hall

01-04-2010 11:35 PM

Possible home wins:

Denver (we just beat them at Denver)
Oakland (we have to beat them at Arrowhead some time)
Jacksonville
San Francisco
Buffalo (it's about time)

Possible road wins:

Denver (we just pulled it off)
Oakland
St. Louis
Seattle
Cleveland

We have just about the easiest schedule we could ask for.

DaneMcCloud

01-04-2010 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 6410308)

Haley needs to find someone well versed in the Erhardt-Perkins offense.

Weis would be a fantastic choice IMO.

Gailey knew it as well, which made it an even more shocking move when he was fired.

DaneMcCloud

01-04-2010 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam Hall (Post 6410415)

Folly.

People say this EVERY year.

We need to see an significant upgrade in coaching and talent before predicting wins.

DaneMcCloud

01-04-2010 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC111110 (Post 6410323)

Nope.

Carthon is a major bust at OC.

They fired and replaced the WR coach.

Bill Muir? :Lin:

It'll need to be someone from outside the organization.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:01 AM.

Page 3 of 6

Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page