ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Jimmy Clausen Scouting Report (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=224611)

AustinChief 03-10-2010 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6591794)
The spread alone will make it impossible for Bradford to do anything next year.

Impossible is WAY too strong... unlikely is a better guess. ... and this is coming from a guy who never really thought Bradford was that good.

I just never felt that Bradford was the main reason OK won games... after he went down and they floundered... I may have been too harsh on him... but I'm STILL not a huge fan. I'd take Clausen over him BUT I also don't want Clausen... too many (probably) better QBs next year.

I want D and a solid WR if one falls to us at value... and maybe a mid-late round OT... otherwise, stick with D

The Franchise 03-10-2010 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6591226)
He's got no mobility and has to wind up to throw a ball more than 20 yards. Not even remotely close to being what Shanahan wants from a quarterback.

However, Pestilence says he's already been fitted for his bust in Canton, so I'll go with his assessment. I'm sure he's looking at Clausen's pro potential objectively. Sure, Clausen really only had one good season and tossed 17 picks his sophomore year alone, is on the small side, with short arms and small hands and comes off as an entitled douche that looks to blame others before himself. But we want guys like that on our team.

Yep....that's exactly what I said....you ****ing douche.

Go back to basing your opinion of a player off of stats and YouTube clips.

milkman 03-10-2010 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6591594)
are you drunk?

No, he's just a useless dumbass.

BigCatDaddy 03-10-2010 04:05 PM

[QUOTE=kcrockaholic4life;6591777]Well we see guys like Matt Ryan and Mark Sanchez, or Big Ben step in and be a decent QB at an early stage of their career I don't think Clausen is going to be close to that. That's not taking away what he can be in his prime, but I can just picture all the Clausen lovers worried to death, that he is a bust after having a terrible rookie season if he starts. While the anti-Clausen people are saying "I told you so."



What????? How can you compare Mark Sanchez's rookie numbers with that of Matt Ryan and Bens?????? You watch football yes?

BigCatDaddy 03-10-2010 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6591794)
The spread alone will make it impossible for Bradford to do anything next year.

My offer still stands bro if you are so sure. Lifetime ban for me vs 1 year for you.

"The Sure Fire Bust" Sam Bradford vs "El 2nd Cumo!" Jesus' Sanchez!

BossChief 03-10-2010 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 6593587)
My offer still stands bro if you are so sure. Lifetime ban for me vs 1 year for you.

"The Sure Fire Bust" Sam Bradford vs "El 2nd Cumo!" Jesus' Sanchez!

these kind of bets are ****ing reeruned

If you want to make a bet, make it a 1 line sig bet. Make the loser wear that blackeye around the Planet...this ban me bs is pussy

Saccopoo 03-10-2010 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6591801)
in NDs 6 losses this year, the offense put up

34
27
21
22
30
38

I would love to see how he would be perceived if his defense was a decent unit...

Holy shit!! That's ****ing Arena football right there!

Saccopoo 03-10-2010 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6593715)
these kind of bets are ****ing reeruned

If you want to make a bet, make it a 1 line sig bet. Make the loser wear that blackeye around the Planet...this ban me bs is pussy

I'd like to see it get taken to a higher level. Cut off the tip of a finger, burn a hole in your arm with a lit cigar or something like that. Let's make it a little more meaningful in terms of putting your money where your mouth is, and nothing says "I'm sure of it" like a little physical disfigurement riding on your words.

Maybe just shaving your eyebrows would suffice, but I think the pain thing goes a long way in closing up the vast expanse of middle ground on the internet.

Nightfyre 03-10-2010 04:55 PM

christ, if you had your way, you'd be post incident harvey dent.
Posted via Mobile Device

Saccopoo 03-10-2010 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 6593792)
christ, if you had your way, you'd be post incident harvey dent.
Posted via Mobile Device

http://www.insidesocal.com/tv/Harvey...Two%20face.jpg

You live by the sword, you die by the sword.

KCrockaholic 03-10-2010 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 6593582)


What????? How can you compare Mark Sanchez's rookie numbers with that of Matt Ryan and Bens?????? You watch football yes?

Ben didn't have great rookie numbers either. But he didn't turn the ball over, and took his team very far for a rookie QB. The same thing happened with Sanchez. I don't think I said anything about Sanchez having great numbers. He did a solid job, and did a fantastic job once he got to the playoffs. If you look in-depth at the Sanchez INT's they occured when the Jets where losing and he was flying the ball around trying to make a comeback. My main point is that Clausen is going to have a steep learning curve in the NFL. But, once he masters it, he will have his name mentioned in the same sentence as Ben, Rodgers, and Rivers.

BigCatDaddy 03-10-2010 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6593715)
these kind of bets are ****ing reeruned

If you want to make a bet, make it a 1 line sig bet. Make the loser wear that blackeye around the Planet...this ban me bs is pussy

Nah, that's too easy.

BigCatDaddy 03-10-2010 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 6593809)
Ben didn't have great rookie numbers either. But he didn't turn the ball over, and took his team very far for a rookie QB. The same thing happened with Sanchez. I don't think I said anything about Sanchez having great numbers. He did a solid job, and did a fantastic job once he got to the playoffs. If you look in-depth at the Sanchez INT's they occured when the Jets where losing and he was flying the ball around trying to make a comeback. My main point is that Clausen is going to have a steep learning curve in the NFL. But, once he masters it, he will have his name mentioned in the same sentence as Ben, Rodgers, and Rivers.

So you are saying when the team needed Sanchez to step up an win a game he threw INT's? Which is correct, because they only won with defense and a running game and when behind couldn't count on him to carry the load.

Again.... WHATTTTTTTTT??????? Ben set the NFL record for a rookie QB rating of 98.1.... Matt Ryan 87.7 as a rookie... Joe Flacco 80.3........ Mark Sanchez..... 63.0



Sing it with me folks.

One of these things just don't belong here,
One of these things just ain't the same,
One of these things just don't belong here;
Now it's time to play our game!

KCrockaholic 03-10-2010 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 6594136)
So you are saying when the team needed Sanchez to step up an win a game he threw INT's? Which is correct, because they only won with defense and a running game and when behind couldn't count on him to carry the load.

Again.... WHATTTTTTTTT??????? Ben set the NFL record for a rookie QB rating of 98.1.... Matt Ryan 87.7 as a rookie... Joe Flacco 80.3........ Mark Sanchez..... 63.0



Sing it with me folks.

One of these things just don't belong here,
One of these things just ain't the same,
One of these things just don't belong here;
Now it's time to play our game!

You can say what you want. He helped take the Jets to the AFC Championship game. You're missing my main point though. You've made a big deal about something so small out of my main point.

BigCatDaddy 03-10-2010 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 6594147)
You can say what you want. He helped take the Jets to the AFC Championship game. You're missing my main point though. You've made a big deal about something so small out of my main point.


He helped????? They had the #1 rated defense and #1 rated run game and if it wasn't for the Colts taking the last few weeks off they wouldn't have even made the playoffs! That's not helping, that hindering a team.

Sorry to poke at you, but I can't believe some people fall for the Hamas/Mecca propaganda BS about how we missed out on a franchise QB because he happened to get drafted by a good team and he would have been the #1 pick this year because Jackie Legg over at NFL forums.com said so. They need to prove themselves right based on promoting him last year. Based on his performance last year, if you through him back into the pool of players for this years draft he would be the 3rd QB off the board. Tim Tebow can put up a freaking 63 QB rating on that loaded ass team this year.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.