ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Life US open fight (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=232991)

Rain Man 09-05-2010 09:57 AM

The old guy has a "sprawling estate"? I hope to one day have a sprawling estate. I aspire to sprawling-estate status.

ForeverChiefs58 09-05-2010 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 6979113)
The old guy has a "sprawling estate"? I hope to one day have a sprawling estate. I aspire to sprawling-estate status.

Heck at this point, it doesn't even have to sprawl. I'd take a creeping crawling estate any day.

Hog's Gone Fishin 09-05-2010 10:14 AM

Maam.... You left you Burkha at home and have disrespected a male. You are sentenced to death by stoning/ Taliban

stevieray 09-05-2010 10:36 AM

where is I am mother****er when you need him?

yo "joey"....you're lucky the guy was 75 years old.

that said..the woman was completely in the wrong, and deserved to be tossed.

Rain Man 09-05-2010 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverChiefs58 (Post 6979146)
Heck at this point, it doesn't even have to sprawl. I'd take a creeping crawling estate any day.


Good point. Maybe even moribund estate. You almost can't go wrong with an estate regardless of the adjective that precedes it.

ForeverChiefs58 09-05-2010 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 6979190)
Good point. Maybe even moribund estate. You almost can't go wrong with an estate regardless of the adjective that precedes it.

moribund estate? Whoa. Nope. That's where I draw the line. There ain't no way, no how I would stay at a moribund estate. For goodness sake man, we're not animals!

petegz28 09-05-2010 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UteChief (Post 6978838)
Am I the only one that thinks the chick and old man should not only be thrown out but could be charged with assault?

I have to agree. They were the one's being violent

siberian khatru 09-05-2010 10:57 AM

I actually was quite impressed that Joey -- who clearly is a douchebag -- didn't retaliate when he got slapped. You might think a jerk like that wouldn't care that it was a woman who hit him, and he would've at least shoved her or something. Drunk or not, he just smiled and said "I can take 20 of those."

Then he sits down and it looks like it's over, and Gramps-with-the-Sprawling-Estate steps in to continue it, and initiates physical contact.

I hate to side with a guy like Joey, but ...

petegz28 09-05-2010 10:57 AM

I never saw the douchebag throw one punch.

chief52 09-05-2010 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UteChief (Post 6978838)
Am I the only one that thinks the chick and old man should not only be thrown out but could be charged with assault?

Nope. That video is money to that kid. Without it he would probably be charged with something. With it...he is totally innocent imo.

* Not that he is not a piece of shit...

Aries Walker 09-05-2010 11:00 AM

What the hell would Archie Bunker there have to do to get charged with something? Shoot him?

Saccopoo 09-05-2010 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chief52 (Post 6979227)
Nope. That video is money to that kid. Without it he would probably be charged with something. With it...he is totally innocent imo.

Verbal assault, intimidation, public lewdness and about 312 other statutes that the authorities could throw on him. That video is perfect if someone wants to bring charges against the guy. Just because he didn't initiate the physical assault doesn't mean he isn't susceptible to a ton of charges in this case. Obscene and vulgar language used in public is not protected under the First Amendment.

What amazes me is the amount of people around here who are "I hate to side with the douche bag, but..." Let that guy lip off to you or your wife like that and see if you decide to take it.

BWillie 09-05-2010 11:39 AM

What's the name of that mans rights attorney in new york? He would probably help captain dbag jersey shore pro bono

Brock 09-05-2010 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6979253)
Verbal assault, intimidation, public lewdness and about 312 other statutes that the authorities could throw on him. That video is perfect if someone wants to bring charges against the guy. Just because he didn't initiate the physical assault doesn't mean he isn't susceptible to a ton of charges in this case. Obscene and vulgar language used in public is not protected under the First Amendment.

What amazes me is the amount of people around here who are "I hate to side with the douche bag, but..." Let that guy lip off to you or your wife like that and see if you decide to take it.

Yeah, I'm sure the DA is all over this. ROFL

Contrarian 09-05-2010 12:20 PM

Why do you all assume he was a douche? Because a woman is up in his face about him talking during the point? Nothing wrong with telling a bitch to f**k off if she gets up in your face geesh.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.