Bearcat |
10-10-2010 12:12 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief
(Post 7072658)
If people dont care to watch it...advertisers dont care to pay for advertising during that slot...if that happens, it gets taken off the air. Thats just how it works. That is where hockey is at right now, not many people care.
|
Bullshit. The people who bought 20.9 million tickets last season disagree, too. The NBA's attendance was better by ~187,000.
Yeah, Gary Bettman is f***ing clueless when it comes to marketing the game, knowing the importance of ESPN, etc; but just because it doesn't make headlines over pictures of Brett Favre's cock doesn't mean no one would notice if it went away.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief
(Post 7072658)
If football isnt being played next year, that opens up doors for Hockey that would otherwise be totally closed. It could introduce fans to the sport that may have never watched a game, understand the rules, etc. Its actually quite fun to watch (especially in person) but it isnt in the same realm as football IMO...but its the next great "barbaric" sport.
It is a huge opportunity for the sport to get recognized and to earn back some of the fans they lost when they didnt play a few years ago.
|
See "Gary Bettman is f***ing clueless"... I agree that it's a good opportunity. As far as being one less thing to compete with, the NFL is obviously the big one. I think the contract with Versus is done after this year, so if the NFL went on strike (and even if it didn't) there's a HUGE opportunity to sign with ESPN and bring back hockey a couple times a week on ESPN and/or ESPN2.
I think it's in the same realm as football (well, unless you're comparing it to the Missouri Mavericks, because that's bad hockey ;) ). It's just not as exciting to Joe Fan because of the lack of scoring, even though there can easily be 60+ chances per game.
|