I do understand whats written. I think enforcement where the head and neck is not involved will be rare.

I quoted that because you were saying that leading with the shoulder would make it alright. A shoulder to the head/neck is also illegal.

Defenseless, Unless he chooses to not catch it. Grr.

BS.
One not 3.

That's before last "year" quotes, dumbass.

[QUOTE=MagicHef;7835109]There are 3 things that need to be true for the hit to be illegal.

1) The WR being hit must be "defenseless."

[QUOTE=Smed1065;7835125]No other 2 apply? You watch football?
:banghead:

Yes you did....:cuss:

Yeah 2 years ago? WTF

Smed is incredible in that never once has he posted on this board sober.

Really. Why I brought facts and you brought shit?

Wow, I have no facts and messed up but I will attack his drinking from before (while lying) while I am eating more.

See last year and this year so far. Oh, I got sand in your mouth and assgina with facts not sucking off a previous nonfactual post...

You have never posted anything skinny here.

I don't have a decoder ring for this post.

It means you were wrong. Hit against a WR was last year, so the other 2 had to be there. NO

You just jumped another dick and sucked it without knowing and I am sad. Oh yeah been sober for like 18 months, how long you been skinny?

You said no post sober but no facts, just jaw work for sucking others dickrection.

I have no decoder lips for your sucking off a misinformed post earlier....

But now attack instead of provide proof of that belief.

Just ball wallow now.

Oh, so you have not changed even if others do. I see.

I think you were better off when the excuse for your confusing posts was the drinking.