ChiefsPlanet
Page 3 of 6 12 3 456
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs I don't care about 0-4 in the preseason, but I'm concerned about... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=249379)

Hammock Parties 09-01-2011 11:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buck (Post 7872976)
Hi, I doubt any of you have been following the Chargers, but our Run D is atrocious.
Posted via Mobile Device
Liuget not working out?

I know Garay is a good player.

Psyko Tek 09-01-2011 11:10 PM
will the earthquake cause the mighty Mo to run backwards?

BossChief 09-02-2011 01:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buck (Post 7872976)
Hi, I doubt any of you have been following the Chargers, but our Run D is atrocious.
Posted via Mobile Device
Just like they were before Ron Rivera was brought in?

Frankie 09-02-2011 01:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buck (Post 7872976)
Hi, I doubt any of you have been following the Chargers, but our Run D is atrocious.
Posted via Mobile Device
Ours has been worse than atrocious for the first two drives. Then something happens and they wake up. But like I said, as a Chiefs fan I'm truly worried about that little habit.

Buck 09-02-2011 02:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7873148)
Liuget not working out?

I know Garay is a good player.
Liuget has looked good against the pass, but not the run.

Garay has been out. Hopefully when he comes back we improve.
Posted via Mobile Device

keg in kc 09-02-2011 03:51 AM
My concern after watching that early drive is that teams will target Studebaker at the LOLB position all year long in the run game. They need to get Houston or Sheffield on the field early and often. That's what I see as really the only vulnerable spot on the field now.

Offensively, I've relaxed a little. They looked I thought a good deal better than the last three weeks, even in the stalled first drive, and I think they might just be okay against Buffalo, which was I believe what Haley's intention was. But we'll see. Only time will tell.

Hancock 09-02-2011 05:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KurtCobain (Post 7872836)
I'm still on the 11-5+ bandwagon.
6-10. Last years cupcake schedule is past, and Weiss is gone. Plus no injuries last year and several guys had career/last gasp years. This still is not a very good team.

xfactor 09-02-2011 06:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPchief (Post 7872844)
16-0
19 and 0!!!!!!!

Tribal Warfare 09-02-2011 06:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buck (Post 7873359)
Liuget has looked good against the pass, but not the run.

Garay has been out. Hopefully when he comes back we improve.
Posted via Mobile Device
How about Cam Thomas?

the Talking Can 09-02-2011 06:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7873372)
My concern after watching that early drive is that teams will target Studebaker at the LOLB position all year long in the run game. They need to get Houston or Sheffield on the field early and often. That's what I see as really the only vulnerable spot on the field now.

Offensively, I've relaxed a little. They looked I thought a good deal better than the last three weeks, even in the stalled first drive, and I think they might just be okay against Buffalo, which was I believe what Haley's intention was. But we'll see. Only time will tell.
is it stude or jackson or both?

i thought jackson looked like his usual puss self...i didn't catch much of the 2nd half...

TEX 09-02-2011 06:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 7872828)
... our #1 D looking lost in the first couple of drives of each game. I saw that in some regular season games as well last year and I hope it's not become a KC Chiefs signature.

As improved as we are on paper we cannot afford to start getting it together 14 points behind with the regular season opponents we will have.

Thoughts?
The Chiefs are soft against the run. Gonna be a long season if they can't fix it. People will say stuff like,"If it wasn't for that 1 long run we'd have been ok." Problem is they will be saying it every game.

TEX 09-02-2011 06:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 7873372)
My concern after watching that early drive is that teams will target Studebaker at the LOLB position all year long in the run game. They need to get Houston or Sheffield on the field early and often. That's what I see as really the only vulnerable spot on the field now.

Offensively, I've relaxed a little. They looked I thought a good deal better than the last three weeks, even in the stalled first drive, and I think they might just be okay against Buffalo, which was I believe what Haley's intention was. But we'll see. Only time will tell.
Agree in part but the problems against the run are two-tier. The DL has a several weak links that will also be exploited....

suds79 09-02-2011 07:03 AM
Seems pretty clear to me that when you have Studebaker & Jackson on the same side, that screams to me weak link and teams are taking advantage of it.

I think Houston will replace Studebaker soon enough so I'm not too concerned about that.

But Tyson, wow. Really missing Shaun Smith right about now.

durtyrute 09-02-2011 07:10 AM
That's something that has been bothering me as well. We are not built to come from behind every game. That shit needs to be fixed asap. The only lproblem is I don't think you can fix it in one week.

alnorth 09-02-2011 08:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverChiefs58 (Post 7873145)
The thing that can save us this year is our division. Even with a shitty record I think we can win it again, cause the rest of our division will be pretty bad. We may be last year's Seahawks.
Exactly. 9 wins is our ceiling, 8 if we're lucky. Our schedule is brutal, but our division is a joke.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:25 PM.
Page 3 of 6 12 3 456
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.