So you wouldn't do that for Cam Newton? He was playing at a JC the year before he won it all at Auburn. Granted he was talented and went there due to other reasons, but even if he had stayed at Florida it is highly doubtful he would have unseated Tebow. Players do get better. They can go from MEH to superstar overnight.

I picked option 1, but I dont see the chiefs having to give up all of that to move up the few spots needed to grab him.

Its really only a first and 2 seconds. That is not that much to give up really for either of these guys. I think too many see two firsts but fail to realize if we trade our first this year we are essentially just trading draft position so it is a push.

1) Then you don't because
2) It isn't

He's been top 3 for a long time. The first Thursday night college game of the season was an RGIII hype fest versus TCU. This has been in the works since last year.

Racist.

My choice would be do give up the draft picks and go for the QB. Clearly they have a lot of solid pieces and with a couple decent free agent pickups along with the draft I think that the Chiefs could afford to give up next years 1st and 2nd.....Problem however is that Pioli will not give up that many draft picks on a hunch. Haley has already been shown the door and if Pioli doesn't do well in the next year or two, he will be shown the door as well. I think he tries to play it safe as possible and goes with B.P.A. instead.

I would trade down and get someone like Tannehill* at value + some extra picks.

(* = If he does well in the post season.)

As much as I'd hate to miss out on future draft picks, we NEED a franchise QB. It's a risk I'd be willing to take, expecially if it were Luck rather than RGIII

none of those scenarios will even happen.

probably not, it was a poll built to gauge how far people want to go for a qb

hence why I stated they were unlikely.

Personally, I think half the STH base could abandon their tickets next year stating it is because we still have Cassel and the Pioli still would not draft a QB.

I would keep those players. I was using them as an example of what you'd be losing if you traded the picks for the player. I could have used 2009 instead, but that would have made it a very easy decision.

#1. We could use our cap space and middle/lower round picks to build the line/depth. We should pay whatever it takes to get a QB.

If you didn't pick trade up for RGIII then you are one hateful mother ****er.