ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs 2012 Opponents for all 4 teams in the division .... WOW (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=257713)

Lightrise 03-23-2012 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shox (Post 8487199)
I think Houston will be take a huge step backwards. They are no more than a .500 team at best.

I totally agree and that fact only served to surprise me even more that Manning did not choose Indianapolis...so I suspect it was the money.

RealSNR 03-23-2012 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 8487306)
I think they can and will win 8 wins with a healthy Manning, likely 10 with this schedule - it's a beast on the road. I can see 6 home wins and split on the road, worst case.

Yeah. Good teams don't struggle to win 8 games in an easy division. That's NFC West shit. While I do think it's going to take a long time for Denver to adjust and be comfortable with the offense Manning wants to run, they'll be good enough to win most of their division games, knock out the easy opponents on the schedule, and win a few really tough games towards the end of the season. 10 wins is a fairly accurate prediction, I think.

Mile High Mania 03-23-2012 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8487319)
Yeah. Good teams don't struggle to win 8 games in an easy division. That's NFC West shit. While I do think it's going to take a long time for Denver to adjust and be comfortable with the offense Manning wants to run, they'll be good enough to win most of their division games, knock out the easy opponents on the schedule, and win a few really tough games towards the end of the season. 10 wins is a fairly accurate prediction, I think.

Agreed and barring key injuries (as with any team projections at this point)... Denver shouldn't struggle to win 8 games. They're making nice additions right now. Again - win 6 at home and split on the road, those 10 wins should win the AFCW.

Denver
Home - KC, OAK, SD, CLE, PITT, NO, TB, HOU
Away - KC, OAK, SD, BAL, CIN, ATL, CAR, NE

The bolded teams are the really difficult games. Not saying the AFCW teams, Tampa, Houston, CIN or CAR won't be tough - they will be, but they should win quite a few of those games.

If Denver is going to be a team to win the division and make a playoff run... validating the Manning acquisition, then I really think they have to win 10-11 games. That includes winning a few games vs PIT / NOS / BAL / ATL / NEP and they have to win at least 4 divisional games - got to be above .500 in the AFCW.

Do that, hit 10-11 wins and they should be ready to make some noise in the playoffs.

Mile High Mania 03-24-2012 05:42 AM

I really like what Denver did yesterday by signing Tamme and Dreesen at TE. Those can be 2 very productive guys and nice additions in this offense. Those defenses present a lot of challenges, these were strong moves.

Bane 03-24-2012 05:55 AM

Dungver Brokedicks=4-12.

Mile High Mania 03-24-2012 05:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bane (Post 8488868)
Dungver Brokedicks=4-12.

Enh, it's ok... I understand the frustration. I now am very comfortable in saying that Denver has a better TE situation than KC. Dreesen/Tamme > Moeaki & crew.

TEX 03-24-2012 06:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 8488870)
Enh, it's ok... I understand the frustration. I now am very comfortable in saying that Denver has a better TE situation than KC. Dreesen/Tamme > Moeaki & crew.

ROFL.. Of course you do. Now, since Manning, everything Bronco is golden. Reminds me of the arrogant Elway days....

Pasta Little Brioni 03-24-2012 06:58 AM

14-2 now that they got the bestest 2 Tight End set in the world. IncineratedBlob said so!!!

TEX 03-24-2012 07:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grandllamajr (Post 8487283)
In case you weren't aware we were the FIRST team to offer Manning a contract. His agent and Pioli are beefing right now so his agent told Manning to not give us the time of the day. It is hard to go out and get someone who's agent wants nothing to do with the organization.

Um...Manning controls everything. HE did not want to have anything to do with KC. Also, there have since been reports out that said there was a sratring point for $$$$. KC was not part of the serious suiters after they were released.

Fat Elvis 03-24-2012 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by royr17 (Post 8487162)
Was looking and boy its going to be a tough year for all teams in the AFC West next year. Here is a list of who all they play.

Denver
Home - KC, OAK, SD, CLE, PITT, NO, TB, HOU
Away - KC, OAK, SD, BAL, CIN, ATL, CAR, NE

Kansas City
Home - DEN, OAK, SD, ATL, BAL, CAR, CIN, IND
Away - DEN, OAK, SD, BUF, CLE, NO, PITT, TB

Oakland
Home - DEN, KC, SD, CLE, JAX, NO, PITT, TB
Away - DEN, KC, SD, ATL, BAL, CAR, CIN, MIA

San Diego
Home - DEN, KC, OAK, ATL, BAL, CAR, CIN, TEN
Away - DEN, KC, OAK, CLE, NO, NYJ, PITT, TB

Which one would be your bet to win the AFC West ?

I'd place money on Baltimore to win the AFC West....

BigChiefFan 03-24-2012 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 8488870)
Enh, it's ok... I understand the frustration. I now am very comfortable in saying that Denver has a better TE situation than KC. Dreesen/Tamme > Moeaki & crew.

ROFL. Never go full homer. Tamme had a total of 19 catches last year and he started several games with Clark being out. I wouldn't start crowning his ass just yet.

Al Bundy 03-24-2012 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel>Manning (Post 8487231)
My hate for the Donks has dissipated this offseason. I honestly envy them, and admire their front office for going all out in their pursuit of a franchise QB. The Donks didn't have to sign Manning, the Donk fans wouldn't have been upset if they stuck with Tebow, but Horseface was determined to win the Super Bowl. You gotta respect that. Kinda wish our FO had that kind of determination.

Well played.. that is EXACTLY what ever Chiefs fan said on Monday. You are living up to your end of the bet. I will say that there is no way that Claynus would have honored the bet.

highBOLTage 03-24-2012 08:53 AM

Why did the Broncos and Chargers NFC South game locations not get switched this time?
Denver hosts NO and TB and visits CAR and ATL.
SD hosts CAR and ATL and visits NO and TB. Same as 2008. WTF? Probably more Bronco cheating.

Dave Lane 03-24-2012 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel>Manning (Post 8487274)
Of course I hope the Chiefs win but I would prefer to beat the Donks at their best. They can have Manning. Like my name says, Cassel>Manning anyways.

Isn't it about time to update his sig to "break that pencil neck, broke dick Manning's ****ing neck. Go Tamba!!"

Dave Lane 03-24-2012 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by highBOLTage (Post 8488960)
Why did the Broncos and Chargers NFC South game locations not get switched this time?
Denver hosts NO and TB and visits CAR and ATL.
SD hosts CAR and ATL and visits NO and TB. Same as 2008. WTF? Probably more Bronco cheating.

Because San Diego actually doesn't have more than five Charger fans that have ever gathered in one place. Therefore competitive popular games are going to go elsewhere outside of San Diego where there are actual football fans.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.