ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Media Center (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Movies and TV Newsroom. Anyone watching? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=260825)

blaise 07-02-2012 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosmo20002 (Post 8713817)
Haven't watched the 2nd one yet, but that Aaron Sorkin-style writing, where is sounds like two people having a conversation that only Aaron Sorkin would write--I just find that grating.

For once I agree with you on something. I do not enjoy his style of writing.

vailpass 07-02-2012 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zoccer| (Post 8714966)
LMAO

Had no idea they decided after one episode to pickup new shows for a second season unless they were obvious hits.

|Zach| 07-02-2012 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 8714983)
Had no idea they decided after one episode to pickup new shows for a second season unless they were obvious hits.

HBO usually gets out in front of things. They also seem more likely to give things time based on their investments. I was pleasantly surprised to see that news though didn't expect it so soon.

Baby Lee 07-03-2012 03:18 PM

Quote:

Newsroom. Anyone watching?
I would be, if I weren't standing in a field in the middle of AFGANISTAN!!!!!*


* - I don't get 'who's on first' either.

Thig Lyfe 07-03-2012 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 8716872)
I would be, if I weren't standing in a field in the middle of AFGANISTAN!!!!!*


* - I don't get 'who's on first' either.

QUICK! Somebody do a Gilbert & Sullivan parody!

Also, the first episode of Newsroom was pretty bad. I've heard the second episode is even worse. I can't wait to watch it all!!!

Aries Walker 07-06-2012 05:04 AM

I thought the first one was pretty good, but yeah, the second was decidedly less so.

Baby Lee 07-06-2012 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aries Walker (Post 8721529)
I thought the first one was pretty good, but yeah, the second was decidedly less so.

'Less so' meaning 'too Sorkin-ey' or just plain blah?

Great Expectations 07-07-2012 07:26 AM

Blah, weak story, poor direction, acting was sub par. First episode was great in those respects.

ChiefsFanatic 07-08-2012 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scott Pilgrim (Post 8703422)
Alison Pill being on my screen is never a bad thing

YES

Great Expectations 07-09-2012 10:40 AM

I thought it was ok last night, too much propaganda to be good. Much better than the second episode, but still not as good as the first one.

Bambi 07-09-2012 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Great Expectations (Post 8727278)
I thought it was ok last night, too much propaganda to be good. Much better than the second episode, but still not as good as the first one.

Agreed, was better.

Why do you say propaganda? Do you not think news organizations such as this aren't basically run by big business?

I may like this show alright but I haven't watched a cable news channel in years.

Great Expectations 07-09-2012 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8727418)
Agreed, was better.

Why do you say propaganda? Do you not think news organizations such as this aren't basically run by big business?

I may like this show alright but I haven't watched a cable news channel in years.

I am an anti tea party independent who leans slightly right, although moving left more and more. About half of the show last night was talking about how dumb the tea party is and how their elected officials are a threat to our country. I agree with most of the sentiment, but I don't need to have politics thrown in my face for an hour when watching a HBO drama series.

I get that some of it is realistic in that all but one cable news show leans way left. The "news show" stated that they aren't going to push an agenda, but instead focus solely on the issues. That this "news show" is above all of that and the new direction is concentrating on the middle. Clearly over the 6-10 months in 2010 that the show covered there would be some things to criticize the left for, but all they did was pump anti right messages all night. It was the exact opposite of concentrating on the middle. Keith Olberman might as well have been the news anchor last night.

Bambi 07-09-2012 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Great Expectations (Post 8727494)
I am an anti tea party independent who leans slightly right, although moving left more and more. About half of the show last night was talking about how dumb the tea party is and how their elected officials are a threat to our country. I agree with most of the sentiment, but I don't need to have politics thrown in my face for an hour when watching a HBO drama series.

I get that some of it is realistic in that all but one cable news show leans way left. The "news show" stated that they aren't going to push an agenda, but instead focus solely on the issues. That this "news show" is above all of that and the new direction is concentrating on the middle. Clearly over the 6-10 months in 2010 that the show covered there would be some things to criticize the left for, but all they did was pump anti right messages all night. It was the exact opposite of concentrating on the middle. Keith Olberman might as well have been the news anchor last night.


Although theoretically I agree with what you're saying it's becoming harder and harder not to see that this "tea party" movement is in fact a real threat to the country's liberties.

So much of a threat that even Republicans all over the spectrum have no realistic outlook towards future that is viable. Many are trying to voice that but don't want to come out as "pro-Obama" or something....even though the tea party is an issue that doesn't even involve Democrats.

I'll agree though that I find it a bit hard to believe that Jeff Daniels character is Republican.

vailpass 07-09-2012 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8727568)
Although theoretically I agree with what you're saying it's becoming harder and harder not to see that this "tea party" movement is in fact a real threat to the country's liberties.

So much of a threat that even Republicans all over the spectrum have no realistic outlook towards future that is viable. Many are trying to voice that but don't want to come out as "pro-Obama" or something....even though the tea party is an issue that doesn't even involve Democrats.

I'll agree though that I find it a bit hard to believe that Jeff Daniels character is Republican.

LMAO

blaise 07-09-2012 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8727568)
Although theoretically I agree with what you're saying it's becoming harder and harder not to see that this "tea party" movement is in fact a real threat to the country's liberties.

So much of a threat that even Republicans all over the spectrum have no realistic outlook towards future that is viable. Many are trying to voice that but don't want to come out as "pro-Obama" or something....even though the tea party is an issue that doesn't even involve Democrats.

I'll agree though that I find it a bit hard to believe that Jeff Daniels character is Republican.


How scary!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.