ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs limited in practice: Brandon Flowers and Brown. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=263553)

ChiTown 09-12-2012 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8904107)
People who think this are too stupid to realize that the Chiefs would be in the same ****ing boat if Carr was still here.

Yeah, that never crossed my mind, dipshit

BoneKrusher 09-12-2012 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 8904113)
Week 1 ratings:

Carr -1.5
Routt +1.1

why would Ryan pass to Routt's side when he has the WR on Reeves side open all day.

makes Routts stats look better than they should.

htismaqe 09-12-2012 11:35 AM

Do people REALLY think Stanford Routt is the problem? Really?

This is about whoever is playing across from Routt. If we had kept Carr, but not signed Routt, we'd be RIGHT IN THE SAME PLACE WE ARE NOW.

BoneKrusher 09-12-2012 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8904124)
Do people REALLY think Stanford Routt is the problem? Really?

This is about whoever is playing across from Routt. If we had kept Carr, but not signed Routt, we'd be RIGHT IN THE SAME PLACE WE ARE NOW.

should have kept Carr and made Routt the number three.

L.A. Chieffan 09-12-2012 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher (Post 8904122)
why would Ryan pass to Routt's side when he has the WR on Reeves side open all day.

makes Routts stats look better than they should.

We're not talking about stats.

ChiTown 09-12-2012 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8904124)
Do people REALLY think Stanford Routt is the problem? Really?

This is about whoever is playing across from Routt. If we had kept Carr, but not signed Routt, we'd be RIGHT IN THE SAME PLACE WE ARE NOW.

So, once Flowers gets back, all is well?

L.A. Chieffan 09-12-2012 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher (Post 8904128)
should have kept Carr and made Routt the number three.

Routt wouldve been in Dallas.

jd1020 09-12-2012 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher (Post 8904128)
should have kept Carr and made Routt the number three.

ROFL

Pay $120M on the secondary.

GOOD IDEA!!!!!!

BoneKrusher 09-12-2012 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 8904133)
Routt wouldve been in Dallas.

if you say so. ;)

KCUnited 09-12-2012 11:38 AM

Just playing across from Reeves gets you a +1 float.

BoneKrusher 09-12-2012 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 8904134)
ROFL

Pay $120M on the secondary.

GOOD IDEA!!!!!!

sure, Pioli paid 60 million for a Backup QB to rebuild around. LMAO

jd1020 09-12-2012 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher (Post 8904146)
sure, Pioli paid 60 million for a Backup QB to rebuild around. LMAO

Ya. His $5.5M salary for this year is really holding us back!

BossChief 09-12-2012 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher (Post 8904122)
why would Ryan pass to Routt's side when he has the WR on Reeves side open all day.

makes Routts stats look better than they should.

What?

Routt had a really nice game facing White and Jones (two of the best receivers in the game) and people go to these lengths to try and discredit it?

Routt faced better competition than Carr and came out with a much better grade.

-King- 09-12-2012 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8904087)
We don't need a "starting-caliber" CB.

We need a legit NUMBER THREE CB, which Reeves isn't.

Florence is out there. So is Leigh Bodden, Bryant McFadden, and Kelly Jennings. Those are the ones I can remember of the ones mentioned this morning on the radio.

Reeves is a legit 3rd string CB. If there are better 3rd string CBs, then they wouldn't be 3rd string.

htismaqe 09-12-2012 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 8904130)
So, once Flowers gets back, all is well?

It should be a hell of a lot better at least.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.