ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Romeo says Quinn might get some game snaps (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=264537)

jspchief 10-01-2012 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadMagic (Post 8968858)
I agree, Brady will get his chance to fail soon enough. It will be clear this team needs to go in a different direction at the QB position.

And that's the important thing. Sitting Cassel will be a clear acknowledgement from the team that they recognize Cassel doesn't have a future.

Deberg_1990 10-01-2012 09:16 PM

Nice. This should certainly lock up a top 1 or 2 draft pick.

Chiefs Pantalones 10-01-2012 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadMagic (Post 8968858)
I agree, Brady will get his chance to fail soon enough. It will be clear this team needs to go in a different direction at the QB position.

It's over. Thanks to yesterday, it's over. It's just a matter of when now, but it's done.

Brock 10-01-2012 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8968683)
Hopefully, he doesn't **** up our draft position.

.

LMAO That's really something to worry about.

BossChief 10-01-2012 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 8968853)
LAChieffan:Cassel | Bosschief:Stanzi

I'm not trolling though.

I just think the kid has work to do. Romo sat for two years before he got his chance at the halftime of the game prior to the bye week.

Maybe Stanzi gets a shot this year, maybe not. I just don't give up easily.

Reerun_KC 10-01-2012 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 8968704)
The one thing worse than leaving Cassel in:


Taking him out and putting him back in. :facepalm:

Or taking him out for Quinn. Which will require him to go back in. Its hopeless.

BigMeatballDave 10-01-2012 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8968989)
Or taking him out for Quinn. Which will require him to go back in. Its hopeless.

Can't get worse than the shit we've already seen. And if it does, so what?

It preserves a better draft position.

Reerun_KC 10-01-2012 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 8969032)
Can't get worse than the shit we've already seen. And if it does, so what?

It preserves a better draft position.

Its so bad I.would rather run the wildcat.

Sorter 10-01-2012 09:46 PM

The reason I really would like to see Stanzi get a shot is that hypothetically if he plays well, but doesn't win games, then we have the chance to draft a good QB and have an adequate backup. Additionally, we could use Stanzi to rape other teams like the Pats did with us.

Reerun_KC 10-01-2012 09:47 PM

As.long as crennel is fired.

CoMoChief 10-01-2012 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 8968704)
The one thing worse than leaving Cassel in:


Taking him out and putting him back in. :facepalm:

ROFL I was thinking the same thing.

It's like the thread today of the guy who went back to his girlfriend who bit his damn scrotum off.

BossChief 10-01-2012 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 8969098)
The reason I really would like to see Stanzi get a shot is that hypothetically if he plays well, but doesn't win games, then we have the chance to draft a good QB and have an adequate backup. Additionally, we could use Stanzi to rape other teams like the Pats did with us.

2 things:

What is there to gain by playing Quinn instead of Stanzi?

What negative result can we get from Stanzi that we haven't already endured with Cassel?

trndobrd 10-01-2012 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8968795)
...that Cassel would look at the rush after his first read.

That was my major gripe with trading for him in the first place.

Here we are, nearly 5 years later, and the exact same problem exists.

The guy is just a pussy that's afraid of getting hit.

**** em.


I thought Cassel had made a couple (small) steps forward this season in handling the rush. It's the wild inaccuracy when there isn't any pressure that I can't get past.

I can understand inaccuracy when a QB can't step into a throw, or is running from an angry DE. This season I've seen Cassel stand untouched in the pocket and throw passes behind receivers, too high, to the wrong shoulder, or just overthrow a wide open receiver.

jspchief 10-01-2012 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8969111)
What negative result can we get from Stanzi that we haven't already endured with Cassel?

Stanzi plays well enough that the Chiefs pass on a QB in the 2013 draft.

CoMoChief 10-01-2012 09:54 PM

**** it.....what's Brett Favre doing these days?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.